|
Post by sandypine on Feb 27, 2024 19:32:53 GMT
One major difference between Muslims and Jews is that Jewish canon does not tell Jews to make the whole world Jewish ..by force if necessary. Notice the difference between ANTI ..and PHOBE …..the latter attributed an irrational fear while the former doesn’t. The origins of WW2 include the planting of fictitious gossip that Jews were a thieving faith who would murder you in your bed and take over the German nation. First plant the seed, water it with propaganda and fictitious "examples" and make the population need you for protection. This nonsense that Muslims are taking over (fill in the blank) is just anorher iteration of that and Lee Anderson is following the script. It is a ploy as old as politics. You should reread 1984. What are the fictitious examples of what Islamists in the UK want? It seems to be they say what they want on a regular basis and the methods used are there for all to see and ordinary Muslims become their unwilling tools.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 27, 2024 20:06:38 GMT
The origins of WW2 include the planting of fictitious gossip that Jews were a thieving faith who would murder you in your bed and take over the German nation. First plant the seed, water it with propaganda and fictitious "examples" and make the population need you for protection. This nonsense that Muslims are taking over (fill in the blank) is just anorher iteration of that and Lee Anderson is following the script. It is a ploy as old as politics. You should reread 1984. What are the fictitious examples of what Islamists in the UK want? It seems to be they say what they want on a regular basis and the methods used are there for all to see and ordinary Muslims become their unwilling tools. Like I said dose that also fit into.Anti-Semitics used by the Islamics or the loopy far left is it also. A tool by the left to deny Freedom of Soeech has you Claim
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 28, 2024 6:54:32 GMT
The origins of WW2 include the planting of fictitious gossip that Jews were a thieving faith who would murder you in your bed and take over the German nation. First plant the seed, water it with propaganda and fictitious "examples" and make the population need you for protection. This nonsense that Muslims are taking over (fill in the blank) is just anorher iteration of that and Lee Anderson is following the script. It is a ploy as old as politics. You should reread 1984. Doesn’t alter the fact that the Jewish canon doesn’t tell the Jews to make the whole world Jewish and but the Muslim canon does and by force if necessary. Strange that you should believe this to be irrelevant after banging on about how Christians conquered so many . I didnt refer to Jews taking over the world. The obvious reference was to the very N..i party. You really should read properly and stop making assumptions about what you think someone will say.
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 28, 2024 7:00:19 GMT
The origins of WW2 include the planting of fictitious gossip that Jews were a thieving faith who would murder you in your bed and take over the German nation. First plant the seed, water it with propaganda and fictitious "examples" and make the population need you for protection. This nonsense that Muslims are taking over (fill in the blank) is just anorher iteration of that and Lee Anderson is following the script. It is a ploy as old as politics. You should reread 1984. What are the fictitious examples of what Islamists in the UK want? It seems to be they say what they want on a regular basis and the methods used are there for all to see and ordinary Muslims becom e their unwilling tools. The incidence of extremist Muslim violence has fallen significantly to nearly none. This old trope that is designed to increase race hatred for a variety of reasons, including in Anderson's case, damaging stupidity. He is the one who said you could make a meal for 30 p a day. I could ask you what a meal is. The man is a man lacking in understanding of what an MP is there for, is easily manipulated and should learn about discretion and diplomacy. If anyone is guilty of trying to "take over" the power base in the UK it is the far right who pepper the house of commons with people like Rees-Mogg, Patel and thr last two Home Secretaries.
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 28, 2024 7:09:00 GMT
AND IT GOES TO COURT! Course you could always do the Christian thing and knock his lights out. Then you really WOULD go to court for assault. If you keep posting ‘ that’s the system..deal with it ‘. Ill keep posting the reality “The reality is that it’s a subjective subject open to abuse. Don’t argue with reality either. Another triumph for The cult of leftie woke”. I did warn you . Well i am really sorry you dont accept that hate speech is defined in law and is illegal if found to be so by the long established UK legal system. So if I were you I would be very careful what you say and where and to whom you say it.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 28, 2024 8:52:47 GMT
Doesn’t alter the fact that the Jewish canon doesn’t tell the Jews to make the whole world Jewish and but the Muslim canon does and by force if necessary. Strange that you should believe this to be irrelevant after banging on about how Christians conquered so many . I didnt refer to Jews taking over the world. The obvious reference was to the very N..i party. You really should read properly and stop making assumptions about what you think someone will say. I think you should take your own advice and when you have done that stop making the very boring and tired old leftie habit of referring to Hitlers Germany as a ploy .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 28, 2024 8:58:57 GMT
If you keep posting ‘ that’s the system..deal with it ‘. Ill keep posting the reality “The reality is that it’s a subjective subject open to abuse. Don’t argue with reality either. Another triumph for The cult of leftie woke”. I did warn you . Well i am really sorry you dont accept that hate speech is defined in law and is illegal if found to be so by the long established UK legal system. So if I were you I would be very careful what you say and where and to whom you say it. It’s not clearly defined by law . You should read your own links .. “From the link: Any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice, based on a person's disability or perceived disability; race or perceived race; or religion or perceived religion; or sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation or transgender identity or perceived transgender identity.". It’s defined by the one who is offended . In fact The reality is that it’s a subjective subject open to abuse. The ‘ crime’ is subject to whatever the political correct views are at the time . The cult of lefties are introducing a new era of heresy and blasphemy.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Feb 28, 2024 9:14:58 GMT
"One slight inaccuracy". More than just the one, actually.
Griffin was not given a nine-month suspended sentence for authoring 'The Mindbenders' (which he has never admitted to doing) but rather for an article he wrote in 'The Rune' in 1996 disputing the 'Holohoax'.
His later trial, along with Mark Collett, on charges of incitement to racial hatred on the grounds of his anti-Islamic utterances ("a vicious wicked faith") at a private meeting (infiltrated by the BBC) collapsed in 2006 after the jury found them not guilty of half the charges and unable to form a verdict on the others. At the subsequent retrial Griffin and Collett were cleared of all charges.
The realisation that a charge of incitement to racial hatred could never be made to stick in respect to Muslim 'victims' led to the Blairites inventing the new crime of incitement to religious hatred. The then-current Attorney General protested that it would be almost impossible to secure convictions for this new offence, and so it has proved to be the case.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Feb 28, 2024 9:35:35 GMT
What are the fictitious examples of what Islamists in the UK want? It seems to be they say what they want on a regular basis and the methods used are there for all to see and ordinary Muslims becom e their unwilling tools. The incidence of extremist Muslim violence has fallen significantly to nearly none. This old trope that is designed to increase race hatred for a variety of reasons, including in Anderson's case, damaging stupidity. He is the one who said you could make a meal for 30 p a day. I could ask you what a meal is. The man is a man lacking in understanding of what an MP is there for, is easily manipulated and should learn about discretion and diplomacy. If anyone is guilty of trying to "take over" the power base in the UK it is the far right who pepper the house of commons with people like Rees-Mogg, Patel and thr last two Home Secretaries. Has it fallen because they have stopped or been stopped. You can make a meal for 30p a day, or at least you could when he said it and I know because I have done it regularly and it is balanced and nutritious. My wife and I often discuss the price of each meal as a little competition. In recent years she has sympathised with those who have to cook on gas or electric. So he is not being stupid, it does require effort though. I can easily break down the meal for you if you wish price wise. I would think he understands many things all too clearly as regards what an MP is there for and that is to raise issues that need raising and addressing. The 'far right' in the house of commons are people who are elected as representatives of all constituents and teh demands of some Muslims that the Labour party design their policies around the wishes of the MCB, who are obliquely representative of only one religious faith and some of their followers tells a tale of power seeking and overt influence over and above the numbers involved.
|
|
ginnyg2
Full Member
Don't blame me - I voted for someone else.
Posts: 409
|
Post by ginnyg2 on Feb 28, 2024 10:14:05 GMT
What are the fictitious examples of what Islamists in the UK want? It seems to be they say what they want on a regular basis and the methods used are there for all to see and ordinary Muslims becom e their unwilling tools. The incidence of extremist Muslim violence has fallen significantly to nearly none. This old trope that is designed to increase race hatred for a variety of reasons, including in Anderson's case, damaging stupidity. He is the one who said you could make a meal for 30 p a day. I could ask you what a meal is. The man is a man lacking in understanding of what an MP is there for, is easily manipulated and should learn about discretion and diplomacy. If anyone is guilty of trying to "take over" the power base in the UK it is the far right who pepper the house of commons with people like Rees-Mogg, Patel and thr last two Home Secretaries. "The incidence of extremist Muslim violence has fallen significantly to nearly none." Because like the Marxists, they have found other ways to get what they want.
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 28, 2024 11:08:07 GMT
The incidence of extremist Muslim violence has fallen significantly to nearly none. This old trope that is designed to increase race hatred for a variety of reasons, including in Anderson's case, damaging stupidity. He is the one who said you could make a meal for 30 p a day. I could ask you what a meal is. The man is a man lacking in understanding of what an MP is there for, is easily manipulated and should learn about discretion and diplomacy. If anyone is guilty of trying to "take over" the power base in the UK it is the far right who pepper the house of commons with people like Rees-Mogg, Patel and thr last two Home Secretaries. "The incidence of extremist Muslim violence has fallen significantly to nearly none." Because like the Marxists, they have found other ways to get what they want. What are they then?
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 28, 2024 11:11:11 GMT
The incidence of extremist Muslim violence has fallen significantly to nearly none. This old trope that is designed to increase race hatred for a variety of reasons, including in Anderson's case, damaging stupidity. He is the one who said you could make a meal for 30 p a day. I could ask you what a meal is. The man is a man lacking in understanding of what an MP is there for, is easily manipulated and should learn about discretion and diplomacy. If anyone is guilty of trying to "take over" the power base in the UK it is the far right who pepper the house of commons with people like Rees-Mogg, Patel and thr last two Home Secretaries. Has it fallen because they have stopped or been stopped. You can make a meal for 30p a day, or at least you could when he said it and I know because I have done it regularly and it is balanced and nutritious. My wife and I often discuss the price of each meal as a little competition. In recent years she has sympathised with those who have to cook on gas or electric. So he is not being stupid, it does require effort though. I can easily break down the meal for you if you wish price wise. I would think he understands many things all too clearly as regards what an MP is there for and that is to raise issues that need raising and addressing. The 'far right' in the house of commons are people who are elected as representatives of all constituents and teh demands of some Muslims that the Labour party design their policies around the wishes of the MCB, who are obliquely representative of only one religious faith and some of their followers tells a tale of power seeking and overt influence over and above the numbers involved. MP's are there to positively represent EVERYONE in their consistuency. How does his comment about the mayor of London do that?
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 28, 2024 11:16:11 GMT
Well i am really sorry you dont accept that hate speech is defined in law and is illegal if found to be so by the long established UK legal system. So if I were you I would be very careful what you say and where and to whom you say it. It’s not clearly defined by law . You should read your own links .. “From the link: Any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice, based on a person's disability or perceived disability; race or perceived race; or religion or perceived religion; or sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation or transgender identity or perceived transgender identity.". It’s defined by the one who is offended . In fact The reality is that it’s a subjective subject open to abuse. The ‘ crime’ is subject to whatever the political correct views are at the time . The cult of lefties are introducing a new era of heresy and blasphemy. Dont be hysterical. The decision as to whether the defence or prosecution is supported in law is up to 12 people of all views, agreeing. The same applies in every case brought bwfore a judge and jury. Why do i have to explain this???
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 28, 2024 11:42:34 GMT
The twelve would need a basis in reality to make a rational decision. If the standard is 'someone feels x', then that's the standard they are effectively instructed by law to use.
Third world gibberish law
|
|
ginnyg2
Full Member
Don't blame me - I voted for someone else.
Posts: 409
|
Post by ginnyg2 on Feb 28, 2024 11:44:07 GMT
"The incidence of extremist Muslim violence has fallen significantly to nearly none." Because like the Marxists, they have found other ways to get what they want. What are they then? You obviously don't follow the news.
|
|