|
|
Post by ratcliff on Apr 19, 2024 12:18:41 GMT
I do not know how Labour are getting away with all this ...
Labour 'destroyed' documents that could have revealed Angela Rayner’s address
The Ashton-under-Lyne MP insists her former council house on Vicarag
Where are the police, isn't there a law against this ..
(2) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner other than a manner described in subsection (1) to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.
Labour has form on this IIRC at the time of the MP expenses scandal Blair's ''expenses'' records couldn't be produced because they had been shredded !https://www.theipsa.org.uk/freedom-of-information/2011-12/foi2011-071 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2024 12:19:07 GMT
I do not know how Labour are getting away with all this ...
Labour 'destroyed' documents that could have revealed Angela Rayner’s address
The Ashton-under-Lyne MP insists her former council house on Vicarag
Where are the police, isn't there a law against this ..
(2) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner other than a manner described in subsection (1) to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.
Yeah, but Labour is above the law and the police are run by corrupt institutions. It's best to think of the police today as Stalin's henchman protecting the party. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 19, 2024 12:20:47 GMT
I do not know how Labour are getting away with all this ...
Labour 'destroyed' documents that could have revealed Angela Rayner’s address
The Ashton-under-Lyne MP insists her former council house on Vicarag
Where are the police, isn't there a law against this ..
(2) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner other than a manner described in subsection (1) to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.
Labour has form on this IIRC at the time of the MP expenses scandal Blair's ''expenses'' records couldn't be produced because they had been shredded ! This is going on right under our very noses, why aren't the media splashing this all over the papers .......... LABOUR COVER UP FOR RAYNER
I bet if this was the Tories the headline grabbers would be ......... TORY COVER UP.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 19, 2024 12:21:18 GMT
I do not know how Labour are getting away with all this ...
Labour 'destroyed' documents that could have revealed Angela Rayner’s address
The Ashton-under-Lyne MP insists her former council house on Vicarag
Where are the police, isn't there a law against this ..
(2) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner other than a manner described in subsection (1) to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.
and the police are run by corrupt institutions. It's best to think of the police today as Stalin's henchman protecting the party. It absolutely looks that way. |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Apr 19, 2024 13:19:59 GMT
Most organisations shred documents after 6-7 years because of data protection.
Her story is obvious bullshit. She obviously got married then kept the house for five years because she would have had to repay the Right to Buy discount. It is hardly crime of the century, and I'm guessing thousands of people have done the same thing. The problem is most people don't then become an MP... and even worse... an MP that spends all her time finger pointing at other people.
Her team are now briefing that there is no tax due because of "kitchen alterations", which if you look at the state of that kitchen is obviously more bullshit haha.
I highly doubt the police will charge her with anything because low level stuff like this is usually fobbed off as being "not in the public interest". However, the damage is already done because her side of the story is such utter bullshit. Starmer is loving it because there is no way she will be able to challenge him for leadership now.
Basically, we now get 10-15 years of Starmer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 19, 2024 13:25:12 GMT
Most organisations shred documents after 6-7 years because of data protection. Her story is obvious bullshit. She obviously got married then kept the house for five years because she would have had to repay the Right to Buy discount. It is hardly crime of the century, and I'm guessing thousands of people have done the same thing. The problem is most people don't then become an MP... and even worse... an MP that spends all her time finger pointing at other people. Her team are now briefing that there is no tax due because of "kitchen alterations", which if you look at the state of that kitchen is obviously more bullshit haha. I highly doubt the police will charge her with anything because low level stuff like this is usually fobbed off as being "not in the public interest". However, the damage is already done because her side of the story is such utter bullshit. Starmer is loving it because there is no way she will be able to challenge him for leadership now. Basically, we now get 10-15 years of Starmer. Absolutely, it's almost a forgone conclusion that she'll get off with anything thrown at her, can you imagine if this was Boris Johnson, Rayner would be wetting her knickers SHOUTING cover up, DEMANDING he resigned, the police aren't doing their job ... the usual Rayner blah blah blah
The problem wet knickers is going to have, how can she possibly keep a straight face while she's preaching about how her and Labour are going to tax people to death, and close up tax loopholes, she'll be a double standard hypocritical laughingstock.
|
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Apr 19, 2024 15:33:51 GMT
Most organisations shred documents after 6-7 years because of data protection. Her story is obvious bullshit. She obviously got married then kept the house for five years because she would have had to repay the Right to Buy discount. It is hardly crime of the century, and I'm guessing thousands of people have done the same thing. The problem is most people don't then become an MP... and even worse... an MP that spends all her time finger pointing at other people. Her team are now briefing that there is no tax due because of "kitchen alterations", which if you look at the state of that kitchen is obviously more bullshit haha. I highly doubt the police will charge her with anything because low level stuff like this is usually fobbed off as being "not in the public interest". However, the damage is already done because her side of the story is such utter bullshit. Starmer is loving it because there is no way she will be able to challenge him for leadership now. Basically, we now get 10-15 years of Starmer. Her team seriously expect anyone with a brain to believe that anyone ( sensible or otherwise )would spend some £48000 replacing a kitchen in a council house sold for a mere £127000 ? Those without working brain cells might be taken in by this crap , normal people will not It's obviously complete bs that even £400 was spent, looking at the state of it |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Apr 19, 2024 15:39:08 GMT
Most organisations shred documents after 6-7 years because of data protection. Her story is obvious bullshit. She obviously got married then kept the house for five years because she would have had to repay the Right to Buy discount. It is hardly crime of the century, and I'm guessing thousands of people have done the same thing. The problem is most people don't then become an MP... and even worse... an MP that spends all her time finger pointing at other people. Her team are now briefing that there is no tax due because of "kitchen alterations", which if you look at the state of that kitchen is obviously more bullshit haha. I highly doubt the police will charge her with anything because low level stuff like this is usually fobbed off as being "not in the public interest". However, the damage is already done because her side of the story is such utter bullshit. Starmer is loving it because there is no way she will be able to challenge him for leadership now. Basically, we now get 10-15 years of Starmer. Hope the authorities are also looking if any benefits fraud that may have taken place ? This was before she became an MP and was supposedly a part time carer /shop steward - if both her and Mr Growler were claiming welfare and declaring that they lived apart when they did not that's fraudulent claims to add to her woes. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 20, 2024 5:41:58 GMT
Most organisations shred documents after 6-7 years because of data protection. Her story is obvious bullshit. She obviously got married then kept the house for five years because she would have had to repay the Right to Buy discount. It is hardly crime of the century, and I'm guessing thousands of people have done the same thing. The problem is most people don't then become an MP... and even worse... an MP that spends all her time finger pointing at other people. Her team are now briefing that there is no tax due because of "kitchen alterations", which if you look at the state of that kitchen is obviously more bullshit haha. I highly doubt the police will charge her with anything because low level stuff like this is usually fobbed off as being "not in the public interest". However, the damage is already done because her side of the story is such utter bullshit. Starmer is loving it because there is no way she will be able to challenge him for leadership now. Basically, we now get 10-15 years of Starmer. Her team seriously expect anyone with a brain to believe that anyone ( sensible or otherwise )would spend some £48000 replacing a kitchen in a council house sold for a mere £127000 ? Those without working brain cells might be taken in by this crap , normal people will not It's obviously complete bs that even £400 was spent, looking at the state of it LOL she could have purchased a brand new top of the range camper van with zero miles on the clock for less than that from the ex mayor of Sotland and her husband.... |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Apr 20, 2024 9:07:12 GMT
Most organisations shred documents after 6-7 years because of data protection. Her story is obvious bullshit. She obviously got married then kept the house for five years because she would have had to repay the Right to Buy discount. It is hardly crime of the century, and I'm guessing thousands of people have done the same thing. The problem is most people don't then become an MP... and even worse... an MP that spends all her time finger pointing at other people. Her team are now briefing that there is no tax due because of "kitchen alterations", which if you look at the state of that kitchen is obviously more bullshit haha. I highly doubt the police will charge her with anything because low level stuff like this is usually fobbed off as being "not in the public interest". However, the damage is already done because her side of the story is such utter bullshit. Starmer is loving it because there is no way she will be able to challenge him for leadership now. Basically, we now get 10-15 years of Starmer. Her team seriously expect anyone with a brain to believe that anyone ( sensible or otherwise )would spend some £48000 replacing a kitchen in a council house sold for a mere £127000 ? Those without working brain cells might be taken in by this crap , normal people will not It's obviously complete bs that even £400 was spent, looking at the state of it Yup, it just plays straight into the hands on The Mail. Hmmm what will the story be this Sunday.... a complete costing of that kitchen... be lucky if it comes to a grand. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 20, 2024 10:32:24 GMT
 ice big galley kitchen but not an expensive one . |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Apr 20, 2024 13:01:14 GMT
It's an ordinary cheap but functional kitchen, a few cupboards, not modern - maybe £800-1000 max , it's not that big either the washing machine / dryer are sited in it and none of the white goods are integral |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 20, 2024 13:05:53 GMT
It's an ordinary cheap but functional kitchen, a few cupboards, not modern - maybe £800-1000 max , it's not that big either the washing machine / dryer are sited in it and none of the white goods are integral If anyone charged Rayner £23,000 for that kitchen they need arresting and charged with fraud, the police could clear up here. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 20, 2024 13:10:32 GMT
It's an ordinary cheap but functional kitchen, a few cupboards, not modern - maybe £800-1000 max , it's not that big either the washing machine / dryer are sited in it and none of the white goods are integral If anyone charged Rayner £23,000 for that kitchen they need arresting and charged with fraud, the police could clear up here. LOL....Just shows what a thick arsehole she really is to get ripped off by a con artist.... |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Apr 20, 2024 13:26:36 GMT
It's an ordinary cheap but functional kitchen, a few cupboards, not modern - maybe £800-1000 max , it's not that big either the washing machine / dryer are sited in it and none of the white goods are integral If anyone charged Rayner £23,000 for that kitchen they need arresting and charged with fraud, the police could clear up here. £23000 is only half the amount she'd need to wipe out the house profit and pay no cgt on the house she didn't live . It's now been shown that Mr Growler extended his ex council house and added an extra bedroom just prior to their marriage and second child being born Angela Rayner’s husband expanded his home to three bedrooms just before the couple married and had their second child, documents show.
Ms Rayner has insisted that she lived primarily at a council house she owned on Vicarage Road, Stockport, and did not reside with her husband.
The renovations add further weight to claims that the Labour deputy leader was in fact living with her family at her husband’s house.
www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/04/19/rayner-husband-expanded-home-before-couple-married/ |
|
