|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 25, 2024 15:38:03 GMT
One of my favourite books is Animal farm . I bought it when I was about 11. I’ve read it a few times since . Orwell was a genius and a political prophet ( in the same manner as Cassandra unfortunately ) . Rayner fits the bill as one of the pigs perfectly. True, she always has her snout in the trough.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 25, 2024 15:39:12 GMT
One of my favourite books is Animal farm . I bought it when I was about 11. I’ve read it a few times since . Orwell was a genius and a political prophet ( in the same manner as Cassandra unfortunately ) . Rayner fits the bill as one of the pigs perfectly. Nice to know you read books By socalist
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 25, 2024 15:42:42 GMT
One of my favourite books is Animal farm . I bought it when I was about 11. I’ve read it a few times since . Orwell was a genius and a political prophet ( in the same manner as Cassandra unfortunately ) . Rayner fits the bill as one of the pigs perfectly. Nice to know you read books By socalist Hmmm . Not sure if he was a woke leftie like you doofus . If you had a brain you might had gleaned that the book animal farm was a biting satire about totalitarianism…of which socialism inevitability becomes .
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 25, 2024 16:03:40 GMT
One of my favourite books is Animal farm . I bought it when I was about 11. I’ve read it a few times since . Orwell was a genius and a political prophet ( in the same manner as Cassandra unfortunately ) . Rayner fits the bill as one of the pigs perfectly. Nice to know you read books By socalist So Rayner who has a masters degree in lying, has now convince Labour voters that they want abolish right-to-buy because social housing should stay social housing, but at the same time she has to explain why she bought her council house under the right-to-buy rented it out for 17 years making her nice little earner, and now she's flogging it making £48,000 profit ....... somehow I don't think Labour voters are going to stand for her double standard hypocrisy.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 26, 2024 1:07:05 GMT
Waste of time calling the police to investigate her. Look what happened when Durham plod investigated certain Labour MP's and local Labour dignitaries over Beer and Currygate. No case to answer... Angela Rayner could face a police probe into 'false claims over addresses' before she sold her council home Labour's deputy leader appeared to have given two different addresses Tories have written to Greater Manchester Police demanding an investigation..... www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13124595/angela-rayner-right-buy-council-house-sale-police.html
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Feb 26, 2024 19:57:31 GMT
Angela Rayner slammed for ‘staggering hypocrisy’ over £48k profit on council house sale The Deputy Labour leader, whose portfolio includes housing, now wants to reform the same right-to-buy policy, implemented by late Margaret Thatcher, that gave her a huge cash win. Point one she had every right to live in a council house Point 2 she has every right to sell her house under the current legal terns. If you make a profit from selling a second residence you are liable to capital gains tax. Which is why Raynor pretended the property she sold was her primary residence. She's going down hahaaaaaaaaaaa. ...Questions are coming for Angela Rayner after the sale of her former council house, bought by her under the Right to Buy scheme, for a £48,500 profit. The Tories have already written to Greater Manchester Police over concerns that Rayner listed her Vicarage Road property in Stockport as her primary residence while registering her children to the property owned by her husband a mile away on Lowndes Lane. Anyone who knowingly provides false information about the address they are registered to vote at could face conviction and a prison sentence… Now more questions are being asked about Rayner’s tax affairs. If you sell your primary residence you do not pay Capital Gains Tax (CGT) under Private Residence Relief. The Tories want to know which of the two addresses was Rayner’s principal primary residence between 2009 and 2015 and whether Rayner made use of the tax relief when she sold her Vicarage Road property. Even though it looks as if she is guilty of avoiding CGT, Raynor wants it increased for everyone else. Typical lefty, do as I say not as I do. order-order.com/2024/02/26/tories-reckon-rayner-dodged-tax/
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 26, 2024 20:01:42 GMT
I wonder if she was a part owner of the house owned by her husband . If she wasn’t then she might get away with it .
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Feb 27, 2024 1:20:32 GMT
I wonder if she was a part owner of the house owned by her husband . If she wasn’t then she might get away with it . It looks like Darren Bowen lived with her husband. Neighbours said Rayner moved out in 2009 to live with her husband, and Darren Bowen moved into her old home. Even though she moved out she was still registered at the old address, and interestingly, Bowen still registered at his old address too. Her plan to oust Starmer and become PM is fucked if she didn't pay capital gains tax, as she clearly wasn't living there and was letting it out. I bet Starmer is hoping it is true haha.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 27, 2024 9:58:20 GMT
I wonder if she was a part owner of the house owned by her husband . If she wasn’t then she might get away with it . It looks like Darren Bowen lived with her husband. Neighbours said Rayner moved out in 2009 to live with her husband, and Darren Bowen moved into her old home. Even though she moved out she was still registered at the old address, and interestingly, Bowen still registered at his old address too. Her plan to oust Starmer and become PM is fucked if she didn't pay capital gains tax, as she clearly wasn't living there and was letting it out. I bet Starmer is hoping it is true haha. If she was registered at her old address and the mail went there maybe she can get away with it but in principle she is avoiding due tax. Or am I not seeing something ?
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Feb 27, 2024 11:54:19 GMT
It looks like Darren Bowen lived with her husband. Neighbours said Rayner moved out in 2009 to live with her husband, and Darren Bowen moved into her old home. Even though she moved out she was still registered at the old address, and interestingly, Bowen still registered at his old address too. Her plan to oust Starmer and become PM is fucked if she didn't pay capital gains tax, as she clearly wasn't living there and was letting it out. I bet Starmer is hoping it is true haha. If she was registered at her old address and the mail went there maybe she can get away with it but in principle she is avoiding due tax. Or am I not seeing something ? That is the problem. You are supposed to be registered at your primary address, so Brown and Rayner may be in trouble, as the Tory MP has reported them to the police lol. I don't think anybody cares about though, the real test will be if she ducked tax. MP letter to Rayner asking her to clarify the situation
Let's see if she ducks PMQs tomorrow... if not she is going to get it from Sunak lol.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 27, 2024 13:06:39 GMT
If she was registered at her old address and the mail went there maybe she can get away with it but in principle she is avoiding due tax. Or am I not seeing something ? That is the problem. You are supposed to be registered at your primary address, so Brown and Rayner may be in trouble, as the Tory MP has reported them to the police lol. I don't think anybody cares about though, the real test will be if she ducked tax. MP letter to Rayner asking her to clarify the situation
Let's see if she ducks PMQs tomorrow... if not she is going to get it from Sunak lol. Would that Be sunak.who got Sky news No 10 confirms Rishi Sunak has never paid tax penalty amid Nadhim Zahawi row The Tory party chairman's tax affairs have been in the spotlight after it was revealed he settled a multi-million pound tax dispute with HMRC while he was chancellor.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Feb 27, 2024 13:30:56 GMT
If she was registered at her old address and the mail went there maybe she can get away with it but in principle she is avoiding due tax. Or am I not seeing something ? That is the problem. You are supposed to be registered at your primary address, so Brown and Rayner may be in trouble, as the Tory MP has reported them to the police lol. I don't think anybody cares about though, the real test will be if she ducked tax. MP letter to Rayner asking her to clarify the situation
Let's see if she ducks PMQs tomorrow... if not she is going to get it from Sunak lol. If she has avoided paying tax that is not a matter for the Police but HMRC IMHO
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 27, 2024 13:43:11 GMT
That is the problem. You are supposed to be registered at your primary address, so Brown and Rayner may be in trouble, as the Tory MP has reported them to the police lol. I don't think anybody cares about though, the real test will be if she ducked tax. MP letter to Rayner asking her to clarify the situation
Let's see if she ducks PMQs tomorrow... if not she is going to get it from Sunak lol. If she has avoided paying tax that is not a matter for the Police but HMRC IMHO I don't think it's got to do with not paying taxes, apparently she has signed 'legal' documents giving two different addresses at the same time, which they are trying to say amounts to 'fraud' by false representation.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 27, 2024 13:49:13 GMT
If she has avoided paying tax that is not a matter for the Police but HMRC IMHO I don't think it's got to do with not paying taxes, apparently she has signed 'legal' documents giving two different addresses at the same time, which they are trying to say amounts to 'fraud' by false representation. But you Conveniently missed this post ?
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 27, 2024 13:52:51 GMT
I don't think it's got to do with not paying taxes, apparently she has signed 'legal' documents giving two different addresses at the same time, which they are trying to say amounts to 'fraud' by false representation. But you Conveniently missed this post ? What post?
|
|