|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 11, 2024 10:01:49 GMT
Unless, or until a person is proved guilty, a person is innocentThis is a non-story, gossip, assumption, speculation and clutching at straws, researched and first published by a rabid Right wing excuse for a newspaper. It reminds me of the smear that opponents of Keir Starmer tried some years ago, suggesting that Starmer as DPP somehow "let Jimmy Saville off" charges of sexual assault or sexual activity with a minor. Perhaps not as quite low, or as disgusting, but it shows the depths to which the fanatical Right wing press will stoop to. I don't remember you having the same stance over Boris Johnson and Partygate.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 11, 2024 10:04:08 GMT
Yup. ^ I haven’t seen one leftie on here say that she should be transparent to dispel this . It’s as if they think the accusation might be correct. Oh she should definitely provide any and all evidence asked for by a relevant authority, competent to assess the alleged wrongs she has allegedly committed. Does that mean spilling everything to a rabid Tory sympathiser press-rabble? No. She is beholden to The Law, Parliament and her Constituents. Everyone else has the right to fuck off and leave her alone, me included. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 10:08:30 GMT
Unless, or until a person is proved guilty, a person is innocent This is a non-story, gossip, assumption, speculation and clutching at straws, researched and first published by a rabid Right wing excuse for a newspaper. It reminds me of the smear that opponents of Keir Starmer tried some years ago, suggesting that Starmer as DPP somehow "let Jimmy Saville off" charges of sexual assault or sexual activity with a minor. Perhaps not as quite low, or as disgusting, but it shows the depths to which the fanatical Right wing press will stoop to. Rayner kows all about manipulating our press fiddles she has had enough experience of using it to her and the other lefty knuckle dragging dumbfucks advantage..
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Apr 11, 2024 10:15:00 GMT
Unless, or until a person is proved guilty, a person is innocentThis is a non-story, gossip, assumption, speculation and clutching at straws, researched and first published by a rabid Right wing excuse for a newspaper. It reminds me of the smear that opponents of Keir Starmer tried some years ago, suggesting that Starmer as DPP somehow "let Jimmy Saville off" charges of sexual assault or sexual activity with a minor. Perhaps not as quite low, or as disgusting, but it shows the depths to which the fanatical Right wing press will stoop to. I don't remember you having the same stance over Boris Johnson and Partygate. Perhaps that is because both the police and an independent inquiry found Boris Johnson to be guilty
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 11, 2024 10:19:39 GMT
Yup. ^ I haven’t seen one leftie on here say that she should be transparent to dispel this . It’s as if they think the accusation might be correct. Oh she should definitely provide any and all evidence asked for by a relevant authority, competent to assess the alleged wrongs she has allegedly committed. Does that mean spilling everything to a rabid Tory sympathiser press-rabble? No. She is beholden to The Law, Parliament and her Constituents. Everyone else has the right to fuck off and leave her alone, me included. All The Best Everyone has every right to question the activities of every politician. Especially the ones who appear to be hypocrites. Anyone who disagrees can fuck off, you included.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 11, 2024 10:24:44 GMT
Oh she should definitely provide any and all evidence asked for by a relevant authority, competent to assess the alleged wrongs she has allegedly committed. Does that mean spilling everything to a rabid Tory sympathiser press-rabble? No. She is beholden to The Law, Parliament and her Constituents. Everyone else has the right to fuck off and leave her alone, me included. All The Best Everyone has every right to question the activities of every politician. Especially the ones who appear to be hypocrites. Anyone who disagrees can fuck off, you included. You do understand how a Representative Democracy works, right? She is ONLY beholden to you IF you are one of her Constituents... ...end of. Yes you have a right to question her motives, but you have no right to demand evidence UNLESS you are a duly appointed body with competence to judge such matters. Are you? All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 11, 2024 10:27:58 GMT
Everyone has every right to question the activities of every politician. Especially the ones who appear to be hypocrites. Anyone who disagrees can fuck off, you included. You do understand how a Representative Democracy works, right? She is ONLY beholden to you IF you are one of her Constituents... ...end of. Yes you have a right to question her motives, but you have no right to demand evidence UNLESS you are a duly appointed body with competence to judge such matters. Are you? All The Best I don’t care who or where she represents . She is a British politician.Now read the post you replied to again .
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 11, 2024 10:29:33 GMT
You do understand how a Representative Democracy works, right? She is ONLY beholden to you IF you are one of her Constituents... ...end of. Yes you have a right to question her motives, but you have no right to demand evidence UNLESS you are a duly appointed body with competence to judge such matters. Are you? All The Best I don’t care who or where she represents . She is a British politician.Now read the post you replied to again . You haven't posted anything so complicated I need to read it twice. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 11, 2024 10:30:26 GMT
I don't remember you having the same stance over Boris Johnson and Partygate. Perhaps that is because both the police and an independent inquiry found Boris Johnson to be guilty According to the lefties on here and most lefties out there, Boris was guilty as charged before the police even spoke to him, you have a short selective memory, don't you.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 10:31:47 GMT
I don't remember you having the same stance over Boris Johnson and Partygate. Perhaps that is because both the police and an independent inquiry found Boris Johnson to be guilty Yep the same bunch of arseholes fiddles who let smarmer and slack-alice off FFS...
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 11, 2024 10:32:32 GMT
Perhaps that is because both the police and an independent inquiry found Boris Johnson to be guilty According to the lefties on here and most lefties out there, Boris was guilty as charged before the police even spoke to him, you have a short selective memory, don't you. Erm there were actual photographs of him, at a party, when parties were illegal. Didn't need to be a genius to work it out, did we? Heck my mother, who was up until that point Boris Johnson's biggest fan and defender, worked it out in less than 30 seconds. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 11, 2024 10:35:01 GMT
According to the lefties on here and most lefties out there, Boris was guilty as charged before the police even spoke to him, you have a short selective memory, don't you. Erm there were actual photographs of him, at a party, when parties were illegal. Didn't need to be a genius to work it out, did we? Heck my mother, who was up until that point Boris Johnson's biggest fan and defender, worked it out in less than 30 seconds. All The Best Yes just like pictures of Starmer on his curry night guzzling beer from bottle, along with the rest of the drunks, but they got off with it, thanks to his handy connections.
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Apr 11, 2024 10:35:31 GMT
Perhaps that is because both the police and an independent inquiry found Boris Johnson to be guilty Yep the same bunch of arseholes fiddles who let smarmer and slack-alice off FFS... No, actually it was a different police force in a different part of the country, and there was no inquiry into Keir Starmers Labour Party meeting in the Labour Party offices in Durham. Unless you have a new conspiracy theory that - all the police forces are In On It, and that all the Chief Constables are Left Wing. lol
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 10:36:39 GMT
Yep the same bunch of arseholes fiddles who let smarmer and slack-alice off FFS... No, actually it was a different police force in a different part of the country, and there was no inquiry into Keir Starmers Labour Party meeting in the Labour Party offices in Durham. Unless you have a new conspiracy theory that - all the police forces are In On It, and that all the Chief Constables are Left Wing. lol Does Gray or PIE ring any bells fiddles? Because it fucking should do..
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 11, 2024 10:39:17 GMT
We can't expect anything more from a lefty... Oh I dunno - he's quite "Special" even by the standards of the average lefty. I am not a "Lefty". My politics are centre-Left.
|
|