England T20 World Cup star reprimanded for racism...

Well, I tend to skip over the nonsense. The fact that Starmer even admitted to the fact that the gangs escaped justice for decades because police, prosecutors and the courts failed to understand the nature of the abuse. The CPS wouldn't touch it, and the reason was obvious. Nobody wanted to be accused of racism, because under Labour that was a death sentence for anyone in a career. Labour corrupted the institutions and used their network of resources, including Unions, to shut down and attack anything that attempted to address it, rather than simply address it. Labour were not only useless, they used every dirty trick in the book to bury it.

Hmm. Have you a link to teh 97 case. Moving on however the NW prosecutor has alleged that the Labour Home Office in 2008 sent a circular saying the cases were not to be investigated as the girls in question had made an informed choice. When Griffin and Collet were cleared in 2006 Brown was more concerned with tightening up race hate laws instead of investigating the BNP claims. It is admitted that Naz Shah MP also said the girls should shut up for the sake of diversity, apparently an 'accident'.

Sandy your trying to point out that Naz Alleged something has fact ?

If you read the link I posted on the above thread you see that the report states that there been 17 cases of grooming cases and 14 had been in the last 3 yrs what takes us back to 2008 .
What makes the Alleged naz statement unlikely.
Has for Brown being more concerned about tighting up race laws then pursuing grooming cases poppycoke
Like I said blunkit already had introduced a law that made it easier for the girls to be witness .

What else could brown do.

Has a matter of fact I don't think that law has been changed and still stands to this day

Ho I am not saying the BNP were the perfect conduits for information I am saying that they were ignored in total. Several of the relatives back in those days said that the only people that listened to their serious concerns as regards the girls were the BNP. That may say something about the BNP as keen to find a problem with immigrants but it says more about the powers that be in that they do not want to find a problem with immigrants and indeed have the power to ensure that that information is kept under wraps by trying to ensure the messengers were silenced through law.
As regards evidence it seems that whatever they had and whatever they based their claims on were certainly justified as largely true in the subsequent scandals as regards grooming gangs and the Inquiries.
The fact still remains, they highlighted the problem in its early stages and were ignored and attempted to be silenced through prison.

As I said not the best conduit. Not sure about crying wolf, they adopted an approach that was generally within the law apart from the odd prosecution so the police, social services and anyone else should not have ignored them because they believed they were unacceptable to the main thrust of society. This is part of the problem the police and social services judged the girls and judged those bringing the message. Not a good look.