|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 21:59:42 GMT
The letter claims the house is empty and that the owners are required to repair it . The inference is that the house will be used to house immigrants . Therefore the council is suggesting that the property could be subject to compulsory purchase . The clue is in the words that are bigger than the others . That's just the couple guessing and the Daily Misery reinforcing their guess. The letter talks about helping them. I suspect they've fallen victim to 'man works down the chip shop said' syndrome. The daily mail article points out that there was no compulsory purchase order ,the house was not empty andthe council admitted its mistake . |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 22:01:43 GMT
Yes but as you pointed out the Daily Misery repeated (and not as a quote) that false story about the letter
'An elderly couple who had just moved into their £200,000 house were horrified to receive a letter from their council suggesting the property could be subject to compulsory purchase and used to house asylum seekers.'
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 22:04:01 GMT
Yes but as you pointed out the Daily Misery repeated (and not as a quote) that false story about the letter 'An elderly couple who had just moved into their £200,000 house were horrified to receive a letter from their council suggesting the property could be subject to compulsory purchase and used to house asylum seekers.' And I also pointed out how that was technically true. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 15, 2024 22:04:17 GMT
Yes but as you pointed out the Daily Misery repeated (and not as a quote) that false story about the letter 'An elderly couple who had just moved into their £200,000 house were horrified to receive a letter from their council suggesting the property could be subject to compulsory purchase and used to house asylum seekers.'
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 22:04:24 GMT
Interestingly, far from being a haven of the left wing, the council concerned has a massive Conservative majority. 60 seats out of 78
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 22:07:45 GMT
Interestingly, far from being a haven of the left wing, the council concerned has a massive Conservative majority. 60 seats out of 78 Which just goes to show how reasonable and fair handed conservative people are . |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 22:10:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 16, 2024 1:43:22 GMT
Interestingly, far from being a haven of the left wing, the council concerned has a massive Conservative majority. 60 seats out of 78 Which just goes to show how reasonable and fair handed conservative people are . So your saying that giving Asylum seekers according to you priority over the British population. Is reasonable and Fair handed. Even thou it goes against what your saying . Do you understand what reasonable and fair handed means? |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 16, 2024 1:44:19 GMT
Yes but as you pointed out the Daily Misery repeated (and not as a quote) that false story about the letter 'An elderly couple who had just moved into their £200,000 house were horrified to receive a letter from their council suggesting the property could be subject to compulsory purchase and used to house asylum seekers.'
What Asylum seekers? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 16, 2024 2:20:08 GMT
RATHER THAN OUR OWN HOMELESS.......DUH What Asylum seekers? FFS..!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 16, 2024 9:03:23 GMT
Which just goes to show how reasonable and fair handed conservative people are . So your saying that giving Asylum seekers according to you priority over the British population. Is reasonable and Fair handed. Even thou it goes against what your saying . Do you understand what reasonable and fair handed means? No you moron, I mean conservative people criticising Tory councils is reasonable and fair minded. Jeez you are thick. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 16, 2024 9:33:20 GMT
RATHER THAN OUR OWN HOMELESS.......DUH What Asylum seekers? Surely we must have a forum rule that bans thick people, and if not we'll have to have a word with the boss. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 16, 2024 9:40:18 GMT
Surely we must have a forum rule that bans thick people, and if not we'll have to have a word with the boss. Here’s an irony alert. One leftie poster that whined and whined about the thread title posted a thread that another leftie complained about the thread title . |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 16, 2024 9:46:25 GMT
Surely we must have a forum rule that bans thick people, and if not we'll have to have a word with the boss. Here’s an irony alert. One leftie poster that whined and whined about the thread title posted a thread that another leftie complained about the thread title . Considering the outraged eternally offended lefties whinging and whined about the thread title it hasn't stopped them from posting post after post of nonsense. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 16, 2024 10:26:16 GMT
Surely we must have a forum rule that bans thick people, and if not we'll have to have a word with the boss. read the letter in your DM link. It wasn't about asylum seekers, the council mentioned the issue they have to deal with is those granted asylum 9the government sorts out seekers) So 'What asylum seekers' is fair comment |
|
