|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 15, 2024 20:16:01 GMT
We've moved on from. That what's your none point It's about the thread Being Misleading and a lie has pointed out by Steve and Dappy plus me . But you kept Trolling and Arguing the toss it wasn't Are you going to accept you been wrong all the time even before I joined the thread ? Come on man glow up and accept the responsibility you are wrong So you haven’t read it after all then… You have just latched in the dappy / Steve whine about the title and pretended that you have . And you call ME a troll.lol. You 2 hours ago …”Why would they fonce them to sell it if no Compulsory order wasn't in place .”. That was 2 hours ago we moved on from. That. Why are you still insisting that dappy and Steve lied Are you going to accept they was right and you was wrong ? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 20:17:16 GMT
So you haven’t read it after all then… You have just latched in the dappy / Steve whine about the title and pretended that you have . And you call ME a troll.lol. You 2 hours ago …”Why would they fonce them to sell it if no Compulsory order wasn't in place .”. That was 2 hours ago we moved on from. That. Why are you still insisting that dappy and Steve lied Are you going to accept they was right and you was wrong ? Well your post shows that you hadn’t read the article up to 2 hours ago. So when did you read it ? Right about what ? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 15, 2024 20:18:47 GMT
You are just completely making things up as you go along, you are a pathological liar.
You have no idea whether the couple went to the DM before or after they knew it was a mistake
And even 'sappy' admitted the DM headline was misleading, and nothing to do with my thread title.
I made a title relating to the DM article, it was accurate according to the article .... Idiot.
When dose two wrongs make a Right . Has for them going to the daily mail Before they received the notification of the mistake that can only mean that there was a duration of time before they received the latter from the old couple and the notification of the mistake. But the Mail still published the Article. What does that tell you about the Nail and you posting a misleading and dishonest post? I'll post and I'll continue to quote from the DM, the DE, the Sun the Mirror anywhere I choose, and I'll use a thread title that reflects the article just like I did with this one, if you are dumb and can't comprehend the content that's not my problem, you are a LIAR, and I am not making threads or posts that take in to consideration your lack of understanding, if you don't understand them well ....... tough. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 15, 2024 20:22:47 GMT
That was 2 hours ago we moved on from. That. Why are you still insisting that dappy and Steve lied Are you going to accept they was right and you was wrong ? Well your post shows that you hadn’t read the article up to 2 hours ago. So when did you read it ? Right about what ? That the daily nail. Had posted a Misleading and dishones Article . Don't you know what you was replying to . Was you just arguing the Toss for arguments sake. Like I said is Trolling? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 20:23:54 GMT
Well your post shows that you hadn’t read the article up to 2 hours ago. So when did you read it ? Right about what ? That the daily nail. Had posted a Misleading and dishones Article . Don't you know what you was replying to . Was you just arguing the Toss for arguments sake. Like I said is Trolling? What was misleading about the article ? |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Feb 15, 2024 20:25:18 GMT
So you know there never was a compulsory purchase order and the house was never going to be demolished ? We've moved on from. That what's your none point It's about the thread Being Misleading and a lie has pointed out by Steve and Dappy plus me . But you kept Trolling and Arguing the toss it wasn't Are you going to accept you been wrong all the time even before I joined the thread ? Come on man glow up and accept the responsibility you are wrong Final attempt,this thread is not really about the DM and even the old couple are somewhat irrelevant the whole point is the council have put down in black and white that they want properties for asylum seekers and make no mention of housing the homeless,veterans on the street or people seeking housing who already live here. So forget the house price,the DM,the old couple it is about people who are in desperate need of housing in this country not figuring in plans to grab housing.. I’m not going to answer you again on this I don’t want to be rude but you either understand what this is really about or you don’t end of. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 20:28:28 GMT
 Yup |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 20:30:55 GMT
Misleading ?
Three days later they received an apology, saying their staff had mistakenly ear-marked the house for possible compulsory purchase, but the Saunders were still baffled by the policy itself.
'What on earth is the council doing forcing people to sell their houses – and even an empty house is owned by someone – so that asylum seekers can live in them?' asked Jose.
'The answer to this is to stop them coming in the first place, not to force people out of their homes.'
The incident was seized upon by the Reform UK Party, whose candidate in Thursday's (Feb 15) Wellingborough by-election, Ben Habib, heard about the couple.
Mr Habib, who is also the party's co-deputy leader, told MailOnline: 'I was horrified to hear the plight of Mr. & Mrs. Saunders, but my horror could not compare to what they experienced last month.
'They were served with a letter from North Northamptonshire District Council seeking to possess their home. The accusation made was their home was derelict and the Council intended to use it to house single young men seeking asylum. Known to the rest of us as illegal migrants.
' I can confirm their home is most certainly not derelict. It was well appointed and cared for. They were distraught by the threat made by the Council. They feared not having title deeds and being incapable of defending their position. It was not until they visited the Council and after much pleading they managed to get the Council to desist.The
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 20:32:32 GMT
Misleading ?
is utterly shocking that the Council would fire off a letter like that to two elderly people. And do so with the aim of buying a £200,000 house for asylum seekers. This from a Council that is as good as bust and has never filed consolidated accounts since it was established in 2021.
'The local charity for homeless people, the Daylight Centre, spends £650 per head per homeless person per year. Think what that charity could do with £200,000! It would be able to provide care for over 300 British citizens. There are also veterans' charities in the constituency struggling to care of soldiers who risked life and limb for the country. Instead of the money going to them, the Council was prepared to blow it on housing maybe 4 migrants, after forcing out of their home two elderly British citizens. Disgraceful.'
The Council is run by the Tories – for all their chat about championing local issues both the Tories and Labour are asleep about the damage being wrought on Wellingborough by a failed council and a complete failure to police our territorial waters. Heads should roll and the Saunders should be compensated!
'The only party capable of preventing the dystopia into which our country is sinking is Reform UK – the Tories and Labour have lost the plot.'
Jason Smithers, Leader of North Northamptonshire Council, told MailOnline in a statement: ‘North Northamptonshire Council (NNC) is working with owners of long-term empty properties to bring their property back into use. Compulsory Purchase Orders (CPO) are not utilised to “oust” current owners from their properties, they are a tool used as a very last resort to bring empty properties, which are a valuable and much need housing resource, back into use.
‘The “empty property initiative letters” were sent out in a bid to assist empty property owners to bring their property back into use, and on the whole, the support from NNC was gratefully received. Since NNC formed in 2021, no properties have been purchased by CPO. This is a mechanism of last resort to bring problematic, long term empty properties back into use.
‘Unfortunately, in this case, records held by NNC were outdated, and the letter was incorrectly sent to a property which was occupied. For this I am very sorry for causing any undue distress and worry.’
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 20:34:07 GMT
The cut and paste money did not read the article.
Three days later they received an apology, saying their staff had mistakenly ear-marked the house for possible compulsory purchase, but the Saunders were still baffled by the policy itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 15, 2024 20:35:22 GMT
We've moved on from. That what's your none point It's about the thread Being Misleading and a lie has pointed out by Steve and Dappy plus me . But you kept Trolling and Arguing the toss it wasn't Are you going to accept you been wrong all the time even before I joined the thread ? Come on man glow up and accept the responsibility you are wrong Final attempt,this thread is not really about the DM and even the old couple are somewhat irrelevant the whole point is the council have put down in black and white that they want properties for asylum seekers and make no mention of housing the homeless,veterans on the street or people seeking housing who already live here. So forget the house price,the DM,the old couple it is about people who are in desperate need of housing in this country not figuring in plans to grab housing.. I’m not going to answer you again on this I don’t want to be rude but you either understand what this is really about or you don’t end of. I think lefty and steve have made a issue about the thread title because they want to distract from the letter itself.
It doesn't suit their agenda to highlight that Asylum seekers, Ukraine Afghan refugees are taking priority housing over our own homeless, so they will continue to ignore the crux of the article and ramble on about the thread title. They are dishonest.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Feb 15, 2024 20:49:08 GMT
Bloody hell, the letter was sent by mistake, the council thought the house was empty and the owners they were the owners of the empty house. So in That case why are the old couple the Daily Nail and you and others are making a none point if it wasn't going to Haopen . I ask you why did you post Council going to Chuck out old Couple for Asylum seekers if that was the case it wouldn't happen. Can you explain that please . I take it you didn't read the details then. Still. The point is an arrogant council were being the arrogant bastards they are, and being too fucking arrogant to check the history of the property before trying it on. They deserve a kicking for their behaviour. That’s it |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 20:57:52 GMT
Why would they fonce them to sell it if no Compulsory order wasn't in place . They didn’t force them to sell it. If you had read the article then you would have known that. Why did you lie and claim that you read the article ? So it turns out the couple concerned were lying, the council was actually politely inquiring and no 'force' was mentioned. The people that should most have read the letter are a) the couple b) the Daily Mail c) the author of the OP  |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Feb 15, 2024 21:07:13 GMT
They didn’t force them to sell it. If you had read the article then you would have known that. Why did you lie and claim that you read the article ? So it turns out the couple concerned were lying, the council was actually politely inquiring and no 'force' was mentioned. The people that should most have read the letter are a) the couple b) the Daily Mail c) the author of the OP You are missing the point too Steve it’s about who housing is being prioritised for in this country, |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 21:09:20 GMT
So it turns out the couple concerned were lying, the council was actually politely inquiring and no 'force' was mentioned. The people that should most have read the letter are a) the couple b) the Daily Mail c) the author of the OP , , , You are missing the point too Steve it’s about who housing is being prioritised for in this country, There are several lines of debate in this thread. I was responding to a point raised on the compulsory purchase line. |
|
