|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 16:50:56 GMT
You’re the one who posted it to yourself . lol. Making a mistake dosent relate to.lack.of understanding. Should we had that to the things you don't understand . Can’t make sense of that . Have you read the article including the letter yet ?
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 15, 2024 16:52:40 GMT
Making a mistake dosent relate to.lack.of understanding. Should we had that to the things you don't understand . Can’t make sense of that . Have you read the article including the letter yet ? Yes I've read the article and posted a reply to it
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Feb 15, 2024 16:53:03 GMT
Read the article and find out . It might stop you making a tit of yourself . First paragraph An elderly couple who had just moved into their £200,000 house were horrified to receive a letter from their council suggesting the property could be subject to compulsory purchase and used to house asylum seekers. Then continue to say the Council believed the property to be empty and could force them to sell it . Question how could they force then to sell it? Oh Smart one . I take it you don’t understand the words ‘compulsory’, ‘purchase’ and ‘order’ ? Tell you what pop me your postcode and i’ll have a chat with the thieving corrupt scum in our council who pulled the same stunt round here then dumped the development and i’ll see if they can arrange for their pals to show you up close and in oerson.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 16:55:13 GMT
Can’t make sense of that . Have you read the article including the letter yet ? Yes I've read the article and posted a reply to it So you know there never was a compulsory purchase order and the house was never going to be demolished .
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 15, 2024 17:11:36 GMT
First paragraph An elderly couple who had just moved into their £200,000 house were horrified to receive a letter from their council suggesting the property could be subject to compulsory purchase and used to house asylum seekers. Then continue to say the Council believed the property to be empty and could force them to sell it . Question how could they force then to sell it? Oh Smart one . I take it you don’t understand the words ‘compulsory’, ‘purchase’ and ‘order’ ? Tell you what pop me your postcode and i’ll have a chat with the thieving corrupt scum in our council who pulled the same stunt round here then dumped the development and i’ll see if they can arrange for their pals to show you up close and in oerson. Why Could they force them to sell it if no Compulsory order was in place. And has for your example I agree I've already made the samestatement about such Thing in My local Area.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 15, 2024 17:13:29 GMT
Yes I've read the article and posted a reply to it So you know there never was a compulsory purchase order and the house was never going to be demolished . Why would they fonce them to sell it if no Compulsory order wasn't in place .
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 15, 2024 17:16:41 GMT
So you know there never was a compulsory purchase order and the house was never going to be demolished . Why would they fonce them to sell it if no Compulsory order wasn't in place . Bloody hell, the letter was sent by mistake, the council thought the house was empty and the owners they were the owners of the empty house.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 17:18:36 GMT
So you know there never was a compulsory purchase order and the house was never going to be demolished . Why would they fonce them to sell it if no Compulsory order wasn't in place . They didn’t force them to sell it. If you had read the article then you would have known that. Why did you lie and claim that you read the article ?
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 15, 2024 17:26:52 GMT
Why would they fonce them to sell it if no Compulsory order wasn't in place . Bloody hell, the letter was sent by mistake, the council thought the house was empty and the owners they were the owners of the empty house. So in That case why are the old couple the Daily Nail and you and others are making a none point if it wasn't going to Haopen . I ask you why did you post Council going to Chuck out old Couple for Asylum seekers if that was the case it wouldn't happen. Can you explain that please .
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 15, 2024 17:29:54 GMT
Bloody hell, the letter was sent by mistake, the council thought the house was empty and the owners they were the owners of the empty house. So in That case why are the old couple the Daily Nail and you and others are making a none point if it wasn't going to Haopen . I ask you why did you post Council going to Chuck out old Couple for Asylum seekers if that was the case it wouldn't happen. Can you explain that please . LOL........ you'll have to wait until I stop laughing...
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 15, 2024 17:35:53 GMT
Why would they fonce them to sell it if no Compulsory order wasn't in place . They didn’t force them to sell it. If you had read the article then you would have known that. Why did you lie and claim that you read the article ? No they didn't force them to sell it because they could have . But why make the None point if that's the case when you said putting immigrants first . This whole thread is Misleading has Dappy & Steve has said. And you agruged it wasnt I think the Mods should lock this thread .because it Misleading and dishonest and trolling to provoke emotional responses.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 15, 2024 17:37:00 GMT
So in That case why are the old couple the Daily Nail and you and others are making a none point if it wasn't going to Haopen . I ask you why did you post Council going to Chuck out old Couple for Asylum seekers if that was the case it wouldn't happen. Can you explain that please . LOL........ you'll have to wait until I stop laughing... Take your time
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 15, 2024 17:37:39 GMT
Bloody hell, the letter was sent by mistake, the council thought the house was empty and the owners they were the owners of the empty house. So in That case why are the old couple the Daily Nail and you and others are making a none point if it wasn't going to Haopen . I ask you why did you post Council going to Chuck out old Couple for Asylum seekers if that was the case it wouldn't happen. Can you explain that please . Look the letter is real.
The old couple are real.
The council thought the house was empty.
But it wasn't, the old couple lived in it.
The council sent letter by mistake.
Couple got upset as they didn't realise it was sent in error.
Old couple go to DM show letter, DM prints story.
Then I post a thread about the story on here , but did not copy and paste the Thread title of the DM, it was all my own work.
The letter was sent out in error.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 17:39:42 GMT
They didn’t force them to sell it. If you had read the article then you would have known that. Why did you lie and claim that you read the article ? No they didn't force them to sell it because they could have . But why make the None point if that's the case when you said putting immigrants first . This whole thread is Misleading has Dappy & Steve has said. And you agruged it wasnt I think the Mods should lock this thread .because it Misleading and dishonest and trolling to provoke emotional responses. No they couldn’t . You still haven’t read the article and letter have you ? You couldn't be bothered to read the article and letter but want the mods to lock the thread ? And you call other posters trolls ! lol.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 15, 2024 19:14:23 GMT
So in That case why are the old couple the Daily Nail and you and others are making a none point if it wasn't going to Haopen . I ask you why did you post Council going to Chuck out old Couple for Asylum seekers if that was the case it wouldn't happen. Can you explain that please . Look the letter is real.
The old couple are real.
The council thought the house was empty.
But it wasn't, the old couple lived in it.
The council sent letter by mistake.
Couple got upset as they didn't realise it was sent in error.
Old couple go to DM show letter, DM prints story.
Then I post a thread about the story on here , but did not copy and paste the Thread title of the DM, it was all my own work.
The letter was sent out in error.
Let's get this right the council sent a letter saying it was a mistake they thought the house was empty . But the old Couple still went to the D.M and you still Had your headlines . Even though it wasn't going to happen. It that what your saying?
|
|