|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 12, 2024 8:21:32 GMT
Some on here seem to think the annual increased percentage in health spending is just waste.
But every year we are able to treat more diseases.
The two new drugs slow the effects of Alzheimer's, but both need expensive testing and treatments.
would you may more NI to get these drugs when you need them?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 12, 2024 8:24:13 GMT
Do I get a guarantee?
|
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 12, 2024 8:42:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 12, 2024 8:46:20 GMT
But what guarantee would I have that any extra funding would be spent on these drugs and not squandered on other things - like Diversity managers on £70k a year?.
If the NHS concentrated more on patient outcomes and less on bureaucracy and virtue signalling I might be more open to the proposal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 12, 2024 9:47:16 GMT
Hostage taking.
If you want the drugs, you need to also pay for my useless army of sub morons...and the price keeps going up
Why we can't have nice things.
|
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 12, 2024 19:42:32 GMT
But what guarantee would I have that any extra funding would be spent on these drugs and not squandered on other things - like Diversity managers on £70k a year?. If the NHS concentrated more on patient outcomes and less on bureaucracy and virtue signalling I might be more open to the proposal. Diversity managers, necessary or not are a tiny teeny weeny part of health spending. Grow up. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 12, 2024 19:43:32 GMT
Hostage taking. If you want the drugs, you need to also pay for my useless army of sub morons...and the price keeps going up Why we can't have nice things. You want the drugs then pay for them. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 12, 2024 22:00:08 GMT
But what guarantee would I have that any extra funding would be spent on these drugs and not squandered on other things - like Diversity managers on £70k a year?. If the NHS concentrated more on patient outcomes and less on bureaucracy and virtue signalling I might be more open to the proposal. Diversity managers, necessary or not are a tiny teeny weeny part of health spending. Grow up. OK - you want to protect diversity managers. What about something else that is in the news - Junior Doctors?. What guarantee would I have that any extra spending on the NHS would go on patient treatment and not higher wages for doctors? |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 12, 2024 22:05:47 GMT
Why, if he takes the issue seriously, is he dismissing unnecessary costs?
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 12, 2024 22:37:33 GMT
Diversity managers, necessary or not are a tiny teeny weeny part of health spending. Grow up. OK - you want to protect diversity managers. What about something else that is in the news - Junior Doctors?. What guarantee would I have that any extra spending on the NHS would go on patient treatment and not higher wages for doctors? Dont you think they go hand in hand. But not paying juniors doctors a decent wages .Comes second for the votes of the Grey hair bunch. Who do you think gives better Value for the Money . |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 12, 2024 22:44:28 GMT
Why, if he takes the issue seriously, is he dismissing unnecessary costs? A pin drop in the Ocean of NHS spending. I think tax payers money Shouldnt go to above inflation payincrease in State.pension what You think seeing you worry about u necessary cost of public Spending. How dose that benefit the working age person. Who have to retire at a later age to meet that cost. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 12, 2024 22:58:56 GMT
OK - you want to protect diversity managers. What about something else that is in the news - Junior Doctors?. What guarantee would I have that any extra spending on the NHS would go on patient treatment and not higher wages for doctors? Dont you think they go hand in hand. not at all - the suggestion was to pay more for new drugs. If all you are going to do is pay the existing Doctors more how does that replace my loss of accessibility to these new drugs? |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 12, 2024 23:02:11 GMT
Why, if he takes the issue seriously, is he dismissing unnecessary costs? A pin drop in the Ocean of NHS spending. An ocean it is and I suspect an ocean significantly comprised of many pins when you add them all together. Get rid of all the staff whose work doesn't have the objective of making people better and you will get my support. As long as you treat my concerns about waste and corruption as beneath your dignity, you do not. Until then I consider you to be basically a scammer. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 12, 2024 23:08:35 GMT
A pin drop in the Ocean of NHS spending. An ocean it is and I suspect an ocean significantly comprised of many pins when you add them all together. Get rid of all the staff whose work doesn't have the objective of making people better and you will get my support. As long as you treat my concerns about waste and corruption as beneath your dignity, you do not. Until then I consider you to be basically a scammer. No.reply about the unnecessary cost of a triple lock pension wondering why that is .obviously you dont have your.priorities right. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 12, 2024 23:13:09 GMT
Dont you think they go hand in hand. not at all - the suggestion was to pay more for new drugs. If all you are going to do is pay the existing Doctors more how does that replace my loss of accessibility to these new drugs? This is wha6 I was replying to. extra spending on the NHS would go on patient treatment and not higher wages for doctors? Also who do you think going to administer the Drugs . Dosent that go hand in hand? |
|
