|
Post by andrewbrown on Feb 7, 2024 17:31:53 GMT
According to the ONS there are 7 million people that are not in work or looking for work Guilty as charged Many people retire before their given date and there is no way I'm going to the coal face every day till I'm 66 . When you see public sector workers retiring at 55 I think they have a bloody cheek to keep putting ours up . 67 is current retirement age, 68 for the younger out there...
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 7, 2024 17:37:36 GMT
Guilty as charged Many people retire before their given date and there is no way I'm going to the coal face every day till I'm 66 . When you see public sector workers retiring at 55 I think they have a bloody cheek to keep putting ours up . 67 is current retirement age, 68 for the younger out there... According to research examining the impact of increasing life expectancy and declining birth rates on state pensions, middle-aged workers in the UK may need to work until they are 71 before becoming eligible for pensions, as reported by The Guardian. It will get worse .
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Feb 7, 2024 17:40:18 GMT
Guilty as charged Many people retire before their given date and there is no way I'm going to the coal face every day till I'm 66 . When you see public sector workers retiring at 55 I think they have a bloody cheek to keep putting ours up . 67 is current retirement age, 68 for the younger out there... Its 66 , goes up to 67 in 2026 and 68 in er don't know , don't care .
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Feb 7, 2024 17:43:32 GMT
67 is current retirement age, 68 for the younger out there... According to research examining the impact of increasing life expectancy and declining birth rates on state pensions, middle-aged workers in the UK may need to work until they are 71 before becoming eligible for pensions, as reported by The Guardian. It will get worse . There will be a lot of manual workers going home in an ambulance , how do they expect a 71 year old to lift heavy loads
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Feb 7, 2024 17:48:50 GMT
It will get worse because there are fewer people working and paying taxes, and with the birth rate falling below the replacement 2.1 children per fertile woman, natural wastage is culling more workers and future workers than are being replaced.
Pensioners may be taxed, but they are also costing more — probably more than taxing them brings in to the exchequer. So it looks like three or four decades, or more, of reduced expectations of state provision is likely…
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 7, 2024 17:53:19 GMT
I'm not sure about workhouses but at some point the very generous welfare levels will have to be looked at - it's simply not possible to continue supporting people who have no interest in working and can survive quite happily on handouts.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 7, 2024 17:57:39 GMT
There are 1.36M job seekers in the UK and 934,000 job vacancies. Who is your target audience? And what about the number of arsehols who think they should be kept by the taxpayers Andy? How many girls these days see getting kocked up as a career choice? Still I guess when we have slags like the growler in the HOC they see little wrong with it.. You do realise that what the police said to the poor victims of Muslim Groomers They Said it was they life style Choice.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Feb 7, 2024 18:21:28 GMT
According to the ONS there are 7 million people that are not in work or looking for work Guilty as charged Many people retire before their given date and there is no way I'm going to the coal face every day till I'm 66 . When you see public sector workers retiring at 55 I think they have a bloody cheek to keep putting ours up . I worked for just shy of 54 years retired when I was in almost 69 years of age, many who are not seeking work may well like you have retired early why not if you can or wish to, my wife was supposed to have her State Pension aged 60 but had to wait and pay in for another 6 years
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Feb 7, 2024 18:47:54 GMT
67 is current retirement age, 68 for the younger out there... Its 66 , goes up to 67 in 2026 and 68 in er don't know , don't care . Apologies, you're right. Thought it had already changed, but it hasn't. Luckily I squeeze into the 67 group, most younger than me 68.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Feb 7, 2024 21:45:33 GMT
Seeing the long term lazy workshy pulling Brussels in December on the frozen wastelands of Lincolnshire would be a fun watch .I would place a large bet that there wouldn't be 1.36 million unemployed or a million job vacancies if they were forced to do it . So you believe in Slave Labour? i believe the country should impose the same conditions on those in receipt of OUT OF WORK benefits it imposed on me when i signed form SSB1 in 1976, 77, 78 etc Namely that Social Security Benefit, and its accompanying credit for national insurance contributions, was paid on condition that i declared i was both available and willing to carry out any work which the unemployment benefit office contacted me to advise me i should apply for, failure to comply being grounds to lose such benefit as any refusal would place me in breach of my signed acceptance of the requirements of the law that i make myself available for, and declare myself willing to do, any such work I swept factory floors, baked bread, served as a receptionist at the property services agency, carried out the duties of a clerical assistant at said agency, carried out the duties of a clerical officer at HMRC, baked a million hot cross buns, surveyed fifty acres of arable research land… And given that today it is illegal to pay less than almost twice the basic rate tax threshold for a 40 plus hour week, which certainly was NOT the case back then, i call bullshit on your above declaration and demand you explain why someone claiming the dole NOT have to be interviewed to determine their suitability for such a job if theyvwant the benefit money IN WORK means tested benefits paid to those in part time or full time work is a different kettle of fish, they come as of right to those in work who are still judged in need despite their take home.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Feb 7, 2024 21:53:09 GMT
Guilty as charged Many people retire before their given date and there is no way I'm going to the coal face every day till I'm 66 . When you see public sector workers retiring at 55 I think they have a bloody cheek to keep putting ours up . 67 is current retirement age, 68 for the younger out there... 66 i think. Speaking as a 66 year old in recipient of my state pension That shitbag Sunak jacked it up from 65 without warning while chancellor, costing me £800 a week for 52 weeks and delayed my access to £26000 in a friendly society oayable on my attaining state retirement age Greasy indian bastard
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2024 22:24:34 GMT
Seeing the long term lazy workshy pulling Brussels in December on the frozen wastelands of Lincolnshire would be a fun watch .I would place a large bet that there wouldn't be 1.36 million unemployed or a million job vacancies if they were forced to do it . I bet we'd soon see migrants being bought in to take over if you and others like you were forced to do it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2024 22:26:15 GMT
According to the ONS there are 7 million people that are not in work or looking for work Many of them will of course be pensioners. Are you advocating that the old and infirm work now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2024 22:31:04 GMT
There are 1.36M job seekers in the UK and 934,000 job vacancies. Who is your target audience? And what about the number of arsehols who think they should be kept by the taxpayers Andy? How many girls these days see getting kocked up as a career choice? Still I guess when we have slags like the growler in the HOC they see little wrong with it.. Whatever species of human being you belong to - homo dailymailicus I believe - I do hope selective breeding keeps your numbers to a minimum. Because if attitudes such as yours become dominant, we risk regressing back into cavemen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2024 22:39:37 GMT
I'm not sure about workhouses but at some point the very generous welfare levels will have to be looked at - it's simply not possible to continue supporting people who have no interest in working and can survive quite happily on handouts. I note that your good self - notorious around these parts for your constant whinges about how hard done by the super rich are - seem to imagine that welfare is generous, lol. For a single person it amounts to about £326 per calendar month, plus rent. The lion's share of welfare does not actually go to the claimant at all but to his landlord who will often get two or three times as much as the claimant does. If I proposed that you spend your dotage living on £326 a month on the grounds that this is generous, you'd soon be moaning about it.
|
|