|
|
Post by Vinny on Jan 30, 2024 18:59:24 GMT
That right I remember a Trade union leader who died think.he was the rail union. Lived in socail housing the Right wingers were in up law. Don't think the know why the then council Estates was built Yeah, that was "Bob the Knob" Crow.
Another lefty hypocrite.
He also founded NO2EU. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jan 30, 2024 19:01:25 GMT
You can tell he's part of the inner-circle on here. Explain why you won't answer the Question. why don’t you explain why you won’t answer mine…. I’d like to hear your objections to our having the right to refuse entry to those wanting to come here… |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 30, 2024 19:02:56 GMT
Why do you think that social housing is only for those who cannot support themselves? I've asked that question got no.reply. No you didn’t you posted “Are you saying all people in social housing can't support themselves”. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 30, 2024 19:06:51 GMT
I've asked that question got no.reply. I'm not surprised. It was mentioned on another thread about the Labour MP living in a council house. Unfortunately some people have the assumption that only people on benefits should be in social housing, something that their own prejudice has invented. What people? Does questioning a well paid MP living in social housing equate to “ only people on benefits should be in social housing?” Are you incapable of understanding the difference ? |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 30, 2024 19:09:21 GMT
That right I remember a Trade union leader who died think.he was the rail union. Lived in socail housing the Right wingers were in up law. Don't think the know why the then council Estates was built Yeah, that was "Bob the Knob" Crow.
Another lefty hypocrite.
Why I's he a hypocrite he could choose where he wanted to live. Are you against people dramatic rights. You righties are the hyprocite one you call labour champion Socalist. Next breath you call some one who wants To.live with the working class Its laughable |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 30, 2024 19:16:16 GMT
Explain why you won't answer the Question. why don’t you explain why you won’t answer mine…. I’d like to hear your objections to our having the right to refuse entry to those wanting to come here… Sorry not Seen that I'm not against the democratic right for people to live where They want. Unless there threat.to.our.Secretary and Democracy There laws in place to take action if they do. But some people seem to be against such laws. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jan 30, 2024 20:11:07 GMT
why don’t you explain why you won’t answer mine…. I’d like to hear your objections to our having the right to refuse entry to those wanting to come here… Sorry not Seen that I'm not against the democratic right for people to live where They want. Unless there threat.to.our.Secretary and Democracy There laws in place to take action if they do. But some people seem to be against such laws. So you’re pro ‘freedom of movement’ ? I suppose it figures. Maybe you should learn enough french to read the 1957 Treaty of Rome as opposed to the abomination the FOM’ers made it with their ‘consolidation’ revisionism. The original treaty gave workers in one state the right to apply for work in the PRIVATE sector in another of the six, NEVER the public sector which was EXCLUSIVELY for citizens of the state whose taxpayers paid for it, and only then until or while each nation state’s government decreed it in that state’s national interest If the FOM scum hadn’t blown up the portcullis i’d be happy to still be in the EEC, under the 1957 rules But that was never going to be. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 30, 2024 20:23:27 GMT
Sorry not Seen that I'm not against the democratic right for people to live where They want. Unless there threat.to.our.Secretary and Democracy There laws in place to take action if they do. But some people seem to be against such laws. So you’re pro ‘freedom of movement’ ? I suppose it figures. Maybe you should learn enough french to read the 1957 Treaty of Rome as opposed to the abomination the FOM’ers made it with their ‘consolidation’ revisionism. The original treaty gave workers in one state the right to apply for work in the PRIVATE sector in another of the six, NEVER the public sector which was EXCLUSIVELY for citizens of the state whose taxpayers paid for it, and only then until or while each nation state’s government decreed it in that state’s national interest If the FOM scum hadn’t blown up the portcullis i’d be happy to still be in the EEC, under the 1957 rules But that was never going to be. You mused my point about why I should think.immigrants have the right to come to this Country not Just FOM. Whith you not fully answering you swived The Answer So I take it you don't agree with me. Even Thatcher wasn't against the EU her biggest grape was the money we paid |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2024 21:20:35 GMT
He appears to believe there's a democratic right for anyone in the world to just come and live here. Fascinating.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 30, 2024 21:40:00 GMT
He appears to believe there's a democratic right for anyone in the world to just come and live here. Fascinating. What's your idea of a Democratic right . I did stipulate seem rules why they shouldmt.come But its Clear you opose peoples Democratic rights |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2024 21:46:08 GMT
He appears to believe there's a democratic right for anyone in the world to just come and live here. Fascinating. But its Clear you opose peoples Democratic rights ... |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 30, 2024 21:50:33 GMT
Somebody tell me how a foreign immigrants right to live here involves their ‘ democratic ‘ rights .
Democratic … relating to or supporting democracy or its principles.
He’s like a nine year old trying to talk like a grown up .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2024 22:28:17 GMT
Somebody tell me how a foreign immigrants right to live here involves their ‘ democratic ‘ rights . Democratic … relating to or supporting democracy or its principles. He’s like a nine year old trying to talk like a grown up .Labour's Britain! |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 30, 2024 22:33:35 GMT
what is its purpose if not for those that cannot afford housing on the open market? Did we build vast Council Estates because the architectural features were better looking? They were built for working folk. why were they subsidised - and why is social housing still subsidised? |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 30, 2024 22:36:52 GMT
What is the definition of social housing?
National Housing Federation - About social housing
It can be rented from housing associations or councils at reduced rents, or it can be part-sold, part-rented as shared ownership. It exists to help people who can't afford to rent or buy a home on the open market, and is usually built with the support of government funding. I Ask you the question do you know why Council housing was built at First. To provide cheap housing for workers what has all this got to do with non-UK citizens, who cannot support themselves, getting social housing? |
|
