|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 28, 2024 8:08:16 GMT
GIRLS WERE 'LEFT AT THE MERCY' OF PAEDOPHILE GROOMING GANGS FOR YEARS, REPORT FINDS Girls were "left at the mercy" of paedophile grooming gangs for years because of failings by senior police and council bosses, a report has said. The review covers 2004 to 2013 and sets out a series of failed investigations by Greater Manchester Police (GMP).15 Jan 2024 www.bbc.co.uk › news › uk-... Police left children at mercy of grooming gangs in Rochdale ... |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 28, 2024 8:18:27 GMT
No lefty, they were "At the mercy" of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs because of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs... And lefty apologists thereof.
Now do go for a lie down, you silly old fool.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 28, 2024 9:20:27 GMT
No lefty, they were "At the mercy" of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs because of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs... And lefty apologists thereof. Now do go for a lie down, you silly old fool. What lefty apologiest? Are you Suggesting that the local. Authority's in Rochdale and the GMP wasnt responsible for protecting the young Victims. Like the Report says It Seems your the one who's a Apologiest for the behaviour of the Grooming Gangs what excised in the Environment of the Girls not being protected. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Jan 28, 2024 10:24:10 GMT
No lefty, they were "At the mercy" of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs because of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs... And lefty apologists thereof. Now do go for a lie down, you silly old fool. You are banging you head against a brick wall, most people know what happened, their parents did not protect them, the children's home some of them were placed in did not protect them, the Child Welfare Offices knew what was happening did not speak up for fear of being called racists. It was discussed in Parliament, the Police were informed and did nothing , bit difficult to charge anyone if the victims will not give evidence, it was only later when the victims were older and agreed to give evidence against those odious men were convicted, I believe more are being dealt with for crimes they are suspected of committing He claimed no Case File was sent to the CPS about Jimmy Saville , yet again he is wrong a file was placed before the CPS to consider charging Saville here is what happened and why they could not proceed and why he was free to keep sexually assaulting many others. " The CPS has said charges were not brought over a file covering four possible cases of abuse against Savile - submitted by Surrey Police in 2009 - because the alleged victims' unwillingness to support police inquiries made a conviction unlikely. Director of public prosecutions (DPP) Mr Starmer, whose principal legal adviser Alison Levitt QC will conduct a review into those cases, said in a statement there were "obvious problems" in proceeding in such cases. This was particularly true where there was no forensic evidence "and only very limited, or even in some instances no, witness evidence, particularly in relation to allegations which date back a number of years", he added. He said the decision not to prosecute was being re-examined "out of an abundance of caution". And he said he would be discussing with the attorney general whether the CPS "should adopt a policy of referring cases to other relevant agencies, such as social services, where an allegation is made but cannot be proceeded with for evidential reasons". " |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Jan 28, 2024 10:27:01 GMT
No lefty, they were "At the mercy" of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs because of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs... And lefty apologists thereof. Now do go for a lie down, you silly old fool. What lefty apologiest? Are you Suggesting that the local. Authority's in Rochdale and the GMP wasnt responsible for protecting the young Victims. Like the Report says It Seems your the one who's a Apologiest for the behaviour of the Grooming Gangs what excised in the Environment of the Girls not being protected. Several points that are really questions you cannot seem to get round your head. 1 Why were the grooming gangs not dealt with effectively by social services and police and what pressures existed on individuals in those organisations to not deal with them effectively? 2 What is it with Muslim groups that predisposes those with such proclivities to act in such a way when other groups/communities/sects have a lesser tendency to be so? 3. Why are the racial and religious elements in this not considered as part of the crime despite the evidence of many of the victims that those were specifically mentioned by the perpetrators? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 28, 2024 12:22:43 GMT
What lefty apologiest? Are you Suggesting that the local. Authority's in Rochdale and the GMP wasnt responsible for protecting the young Victims. Like the Report says It Seems your the one who's a Apologiest for the behaviour of the Grooming Gangs what excised in the Environment of the Girls not being protected. Several points that are really questions you cannot seem to get round your head. 1 Why were the grooming gangs not dealt with effectively by social services and police and what pressures existed on individuals in those organisations to not deal with them effectively? 2 What is it with Muslim groups that predisposes those with such proclivities to act in such a way when other groups/communities/sects have a lesser tendency to be so? 3. Why are the racial and religious elements in this not considered as part of the crime despite the evidence of many of the victims that those were specifically mentioned by the perpetrators? This is in my neck of the woods Sandy. This fucking areshole was charged in his absence as he has pissed off from his bail address.
Fugitive rapist who attacked woman leaving nightclub at Christmas after posing as a Good Samaritan is jailed 10 years in his absence - amid hunt for sex offender
Police are still hunting for rapist Muarug Gebremcal, 34, who has vanished from his bail address in Plymouth
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 28, 2024 12:38:29 GMT
No lefty, they were "At the mercy" of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs because of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs... And lefty apologists thereof. Now do go for a lie down, you silly old fool. You are banging you head against a brick wall, most people know what happened, their parents did not protect them, the children's home some of them were placed in did not protect them, the Child Welfare Offices knew what was happening did not speak up for fear of being called racists. It was discussed in Parliament, the Police were informed and did nothing , bit difficult to charge anyone if the victims will not give evidence, it was only later when the victims were older and agreed to give evidence against those odious men were convicted, I believe more are being dealt with for crimes they are suspected of committing He claimed no Case File was sent to the CPS about Jimmy Saville , yet again he is wrong a file was placed before the CPS to consider charging Saville here is what happened and why they could not proceed and why he was free to keep sexually assaulting many others. " The CPS has said charges were not brought over a file covering four possible cases of abuse against Savile - submitted by Surrey Police in 2009 - because the alleged victims' unwillingness to support police inquiries made a conviction unlikely. Director of public prosecutions (DPP) Mr Starmer, whose principal legal adviser Alison Levitt QC will conduct a review into those cases, said in a statement there were "obvious problems" in proceeding in such cases. This was particularly true where there was no forensic evidence "and only very limited, or even in some instances no, witness evidence, particularly in relation to allegations which date back a number of years", he added. He said the decision not to prosecute was being re-examined "out of an abundance of caution". And he said he would be discussing with the attorney general whether the CPS "should adopt a policy of referring cases to other relevant agencies, such as social services, where an allegation is made but cannot be proceeded with for evidential reasons". " What utterly Rubbish you seen to.be peverdent in such Rubbish. He claimed no Case File was sent to the CPS about Jimmy Saville , yet again he is wrong a file I never did what a lie What I said several times on this Forum That Sir Keir gave the go ahead for the Saville Child abuse Aligatipns to be looked into. And I've also said that pist investigation a inquiry into the Mishandling of the investigation by the police and DPP. Said that the police and the local. Lawer for The DPP. Was at fault for saying there was insufficient evidence for prosciutton . But if you Really want to pin the Blame on anyone it's the previous Conservative Governments. Especially Thatchers it was at that time when Savile was at his height of his Abuse. And Aligatipns was plenty and known. To the. public.But thatcher did nothing about it . Thatcher was a Close and personal friend of Savile and Also pushed a Number of times for Savile to be knighted despite being warned at the time by Civil Servant advisers of his life style Go and stick.that in your pipe and Smoke it. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 28, 2024 12:42:27 GMT
Several points that are really questions you cannot seem to get round your head. 1 Why were the grooming gangs not dealt with effectively by social services and police and what pressures existed on individuals in those organisations to not deal with them effectively? 2 What is it with Muslim groups that predisposes those with such proclivities to act in such a way when other groups/communities/sects have a lesser tendency to be so? 3. Why are the racial and religious elements in this not considered as part of the crime despite the evidence of many of the victims that those were specifically mentioned by the perpetrators? This is in my neck of the woods Sandy. This fucking areshole was charged in his absence as he has pissed off from his bail address.
Fugitive rapist who attacked woman leaving nightclub at Christmas after posing as a Good Samaritan is jailed 10 years in his absence - amid hunt for sex offender
Police are still hunting for rapist Muarug Gebremcal, 34, who has vanished from his bail address in Plymouth
What on.earth has that got to.do. with the Questions Sandi Asked me . Of course it gives you another opportunity to.post Crime by the Ethnic minority. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 28, 2024 15:26:12 GMT
Sandy here the law i mentioned about making it easier to Bring Child Groomers to Court introduced by Labour after the Rochdale case .what is still used to date and brought many pedophiles to justice since its introduction.
Sexual Offences Act 2003
Section 14
Under the Sexual offences Act 2003 (SOA 2003), s 14, it is an offence to arrange a meeting with a child under 16, for oneself or someone else, with the intent of sexually abusing the child. A person commits such an offence if:
they intentionally arrange or facilitate something that they intend to do, intend another person to do, or believe that another person will do, in any part of the world; and
doing it will involve the commission of an offence under any of ss 9 to 13 of SOA 2003 (ie, sexual activity with a child; causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity; engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child; or causing a child to watch a sexual act).
Someone found guilty of this offence will, on summary conviction, face up to six months imprisonment and/or a fine. If they are convicted in the Crown Court the maximum prison sentence is 14 years.
There is a defence to this offence if the person arranges or facilitates something that, although they believe an offence might happen, they do not intend it to happen, and they act for the protection of the child. A person acts for the protection of a child if their aim is to:
protect the child from sexually transmitted infection;
protect the physical safety of the child;
prevent the child from becoming pregnant; or
promote the child’s emotional well-being by the giving of advice.
An example of this would be where a person provides a condom to a girl under 16 to protect her from sexually transmitted infections/pregnancy where she says she is already having sexual intercourse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 28, 2024 17:07:59 GMT
The offence of engaging in communication with a child under the age of 16 for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification came into force in April 2017. Section 67 of the Serious Crime Act 2015 inserted a new offence into the Sexual Offences Act 2003, at section 15A, criminalising sexual communication with a child.
o of age) or the child’s appearance if a photo of them appeared on a chat forum.
offences that could be charged contrary to the Sexual Offences Act 2003.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 28, 2024 17:51:49 GMT
This is in my neck of the woods Sandy. This fucking areshole was charged in his absence as he has pissed off from his bail address.
Fugitive rapist who attacked woman leaving nightclub at Christmas after posing as a Good Samaritan is jailed 10 years in his absence - amid hunt for sex offender
Police are still hunting for rapist Muarug Gebremcal, 34, who has vanished from his bail address in Plymouth
What on.earth has that got to.do. with the Questions Sandi Asked me . Of course it gives you another opportunity to.post Crime by the Ethnic minority. Is it my fault that this scum which see our women as fair game are mainly ethnics? Lefty old bean...Only a total fucking knuckle dragging dumfuck would state otherwise... |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 28, 2024 17:54:24 GMT
When the Police and local Politicians turn a blind eye the reaction is predictable..
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 28, 2024 18:05:36 GMT
No lefty, they were "At the mercy" of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs because of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs... And lefty apologists thereof. Now do go for a lie down, you silly old fool. Try being objective for a change. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 28, 2024 18:10:59 GMT
No lefty, they were "At the mercy" of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs because of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs... And lefty apologists thereof. Now do go for a lie down, you silly old fool. Try being objective for a change. talking of silly old fools, how can you be objective to Muslim paedophile grooming gangs, you mean if it was white men abusing Muslim girls it would be different, is that the objective you mean? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 28, 2024 18:16:08 GMT
No lefty, they were "At the mercy" of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs because of Muslim paedophile grooming gangs... And lefty apologists thereof. Now do go for a lie down, you silly old fool. You are banging you head against a brick wall, most people know what happened, their parents did not protect them, the children's home some of them were placed in did not protect them, the Child Welfare Offices knew what was happening did not speak up for fear of being called racists. It was discussed in Parliament, the Police were informed and did nothing , bit difficult to charge anyone if the victims will not give evidence, it was only later when the victims were older and agreed to give evidence against those odious men were convicted, I believe more are being dealt with for crimes they are suspected of committing He claimed no Case File was sent to the CPS about Jimmy Saville , yet again he is wrong a file was placed before the CPS to consider charging Saville here is what happened and why they could not proceed and why he was free to keep sexually assaulting many others. " The CPS has said charges were not brought over a file covering four possible cases of abuse against Savile - submitted by Surrey Police in 2009 - because the alleged victims' unwillingness to support police inquiries made a conviction unlikely. Director of public prosecutions (DPP) Mr Starmer, whose principal legal adviser Alison Levitt QC will conduct a review into those cases, said in a statement there were "obvious problems" in proceeding in such cases. This was particularly true where there was no forensic evidence "and only very limited, or even in some instances no, witness evidence, particularly in relation to allegations which date back a number of years", he added. He said the decision not to prosecute was being re-examined "out of an abundance of caution". And he said he would be discussing with the attorney general whether the CPS "should adopt a policy of referring cases to other relevant agencies, such as social services, where an allegation is made but cannot be proceeded with for evidential reasons". " Yes, the CPS is not a detective organisation, it, meaning the many Lawyers employed in the CPS who decide whether or not a case should be sent for a decision on prosecution, will dismiss applications for prosecution that cannot provide enough evidence. |
|
