|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jan 15, 2024 15:52:03 GMT
It is wrong to storise a whole Community... Anyone? (LOL) |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 15, 2024 16:02:26 GMT
Yea no doubt Blait was wrong but did he give the countrys highest honour to two Known Child Abusers. And it was Tony Blairs DPP that allowed investigation into. The pervert not like Thatcher and other Conservative governments when he was at his height of his Sexual Abuse Blair invited Saville to a private party after Saville was knighted . If Thatcher knew that Saville was a sex abuser then so did Blair . Saville was never prosecuted …. If you can’t understand the significance of this …I’m not surprised. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 15, 2024 16:11:54 GMT
This is sickening, and it is the sort of sadistic sexual torture that has gone on for years particularly in wonderfully multicultural Labour constituencies, which is why Labour want it hushed up. Labours cover up - link
Labour mired in shame over grooming gangs - linkYou do know what Alleged means don't you red . And if that's so why didn't he or other DPP prosecutors show The Alleged Email Has for labour cover up the man you.posted about brought the first case of Child groowing the Rochdale case and the women who brought it to the police is Now a labour Councilier in Middleton In the met Bourgh of Rochdale. And the labour government brought in a law so that child sex offenders can easy Be prosecuted that law is still in use today Has for a Claim of Cover up what about your Wonderful conservitive party .are you saying the Grooming still isn't going on? The last prosecution what I can remember was during Cameron time if not its a while ago. Have they no past offensive they can bring to Court. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 15, 2024 16:12:46 GMT
Rochdale grooming gang failures are 'still happening' says former detective - linkIs it a cover up by the Conservative government? |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 15, 2024 16:19:23 GMT
Yea no doubt Blait was wrong but did he give the countrys highest honour to two Known Child Abusers. And it was Tony Blairs DPP that allowed investigation into. The pervert not like Thatcher and other Conservative governments when he was at his height of his Sexual Abuse Blair invited Saville to a private party after Saville was knighted . If Thatcher knew that Saville was a sex abuser then so did Blair . Saville was never prosecuted …. If you can’t understand the significance of this …I’m not surprised.oro Yea and I commented he was wrong But you failed to comment about thatcher And has for him not being prosecuted it was because a inquiry into the mishanding of the Case Said that the police and the local DPP Lawer was at Fault saying no Charges should be brought. If you can’t understand the significance of this …I’m not surprised |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 15, 2024 16:24:06 GMT
And the labour government brought in a law so that child sex offenders can easy Be prosecuted that law is still in use today... Can you quote the Act and Section? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 15, 2024 16:45:09 GMT
Blair invited Saville to a private party after Saville was knighted . If Thatcher knew that Saville was a sex abuser then so did Blair . Saville was never prosecuted …. If you can’t understand the significance of this …I’m not surprised.oro Yea and I commented he was wrong But you failed to comment about thatcher And has for him not being prosecuted it was because a inquiry into the mishanding of the Case Said that the police and the local DPP Lawer was at Fault saying no Charges should be brought. If you can’t understand the significance of this …I’m not surprised Saville met the queen and the present king lefty old bean...I don't see you bleating on over that...... |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 15, 2024 16:59:33 GMT
And the labour government brought in a law so that child sex offenders can easy Be prosecuted that law is still in use today... Can you quote the Act and Section? claims.co.uk ™ Knowledge Base Offences Grooming children In this Article... Grooming children and the law What is grooming? The term grooming was coined to reflect the growing problem of those who use online facilities to talk to children with the ultimate goal of meeting them for the purpose of committing a sex offence. However, any communication with a child for the purpose of abusing them – in person or otherwise – is legally considered to be grooming. Sexual Offences Act 2003 Section 14 Under the Sexual offences Act 2003 (SOA 2003), s 14, it is an offence to arrange a meeting with a child under 16, for oneself or someone else, with the intent of sexually abusing the child |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 15, 2024 17:04:01 GMT
Yea and I commented he was wrong But you failed to comment about thatcher And has for him not being prosecuted it was because a inquiry into the mishanding of the Case Said that the police and the local DPP Lawer was at Fault saying no Charges should be brought. If you can’t understand the significance of this …I’m not surprised Saville met the queen and the present king lefty old bean...I don't see you bleating on over that...... Surly your not trying to make Excuse for thatcher who pushed for Savile to be knighted several times after she was told by Aids about his behaviour. And what's your problem if Im bleating about a Well known sex offender. |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Jan 15, 2024 17:08:42 GMT
If you have a complaint about a member use the report function. I haven't a problem with him, it's him who has a problem with me, and no one is 'attacking' mods not even him, so I don't know where that came from?
We don't expect mods to be trawling through every post and thread, and I haven't reported any one, as you will already know.
I'd rather you kept any discussion relating to the moderation in the correct forum. ''surprised the mods haven't latched on to it'' was clearly a reference to the moderation. If you haven't got a problem with another member then stop talking about him and stick to the topic at hand. Attack the argument not the person. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 15, 2024 17:19:39 GMT
Can you quote the Act and Section? claims.co.uk ™ Knowledge Base Offences Grooming children In this Article... Grooming children and the law What is grooming? The term grooming was coined to reflect the growing problem of those who use online facilities to talk to children with the ultimate goal of meeting them for the purpose of committing a sex offence. However, any communication with a child for the purpose of abusing them – in person or otherwise – is legally considered to be grooming. Sexual Offences Act 2003 Section 14 Under the Sexual offences Act 2003 (SOA 2003), s 14, it is an offence to arrange a meeting with a child under 16, for oneself or someone else, with the intent of sexually abusing the child Oh, so you are talking about grooming. I did wonder since you also said: ...are you saying the Grooming still isn't going on? Which would rather imply that the legislation wasn't that effective. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 15, 2024 17:28:31 GMT
Saville met the queen and the present king lefty old bean...I don't see you bleating on over that...... who pushed for Savile to be knighted several times after she was told by Aids about his behaviour. And what's your problem if Im bleating about a Well known sex offender. I am not excusing anyone lefty old bean. Thatcher was taken in just like the dumfuck knuckle draggers that are taken in by starmer. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 15, 2024 17:33:18 GMT
claims.co.uk ™ Knowledge Base Offences Grooming children In this Article... Grooming children and the law What is grooming? The term grooming was coined to reflect the growing problem of those who use online facilities to talk to children with the ultimate goal of meeting them for the purpose of committing a sex offence. However, any communication with a child for the purpose of abusing them – in person or otherwise – is legally considered to be grooming. Sexual Offences Act 2003 Section 14 Under the Sexual offences Act 2003 (SOA 2003), s 14, it is an offence to arrange a meeting with a child under 16, for oneself or someone else, with the intent of sexually abusing the child Oh, so you are talking about grooming. I did wonder since you also said: ...are you saying the Grooming still isn't going on? Which would rather imply that the legislation wasn't that effective. No you didn't you was questioning when I said The labour Government brought in a law to Make it easier for Grooming gangs to be Charged . You asked me if I could provide the Act and section what implies I was lying. If you looked at what I said about has it Stop happening in its whole contexts you know I was referring to there being no modern Muslim Grooming offences |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 15, 2024 17:36:16 GMT
Surly your not trying to make Excuse for thatcher who pushed for Savile to be knighted several times after she was told by Aids about his behaviour. And what's your problem if Im bleating about a Well known sex offender. I am not excusing anyone lefty old bean. Thatcher was taken in just like the dumfuck knuckle draggers that are taken in by starmer. You mean she deliberately ignored advice about Knighing two accused Nounces How can you say see was taken in |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 15, 2024 17:52:14 GMT
Blair invited Saville to a private party after Saville was knighted . If Thatcher knew that Saville was a sex abuser then so did Blair . Saville was never prosecuted …. If you can’t understand the significance of this …I’m not surprised.oro Yea and I commented he was wrong But you failed to comment about thatcher And has for him not being prosecuted it was because a inquiry into the mishanding of the Case Said that the police and the local DPP Lawer was at Fault saying no Charges should be brought. If you can’t understand the significance of this …I’m not surprised So you couldn’t read the word ‘ Thatcher’ in the post you replied to? Ffs I’ll make it simple for ( God knows you need it ) …If Thatcher knew Saville was a nonce then so did the PM who followed her. Now have a little think who that was …….thats right it was Blair . Well done ! So if Thatcher knew Saville was a nonce and knighted him , Blair knew Saville was a nonce and still invited him to a private party . Saville was not prosecuted during a Labour administration with a Labour PM that knew he was a nonce . In other words Labour and Blair was just as complicit with Saville as the Tories and Thatcher was… |
|
