|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 17, 2024 20:58:03 GMT
I don't think she called for action, she was just giving an educated comment and explaining her difficulty in understanding "how so many people are able to ignore the truth that is in front of us". All that means is that you both hold the same opinion Don't put your words in my mouth. I just quoted what she said. As she has a history in the legal system she does have a better understanding of this issue than either you or me. i.e. hers is "an educated comment" not just "her opinion". |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 17, 2024 21:05:34 GMT
I have highlighted YOUR post. Thank you for proving my claim LOL LOL LOL This was your original post “On her Civil Discourse Substack platform, the former prosecutor wrote, "There is so much—a deluge of evidence that a second Trump administration would be far darker, far more dangerous, and far closer to fascism and authoritarianism than the first one was. Like a wounded animal that is CORNERED, Trump has no other way out. It’s not difficult to see the signs. What’s difficult is understanding how so many people are able to ignore the truth that is in front of us." It’s all been laid out in order see2 . Stop lying . Stop lying, that was her word not mine and AFAICS it was the only part of her post that was her opinion. i.e. it counted for nothing. You were debating with me not with her. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 17, 2024 21:09:23 GMT
This was your original post “On her Civil Discourse Substack platform, the former prosecutor wrote, "There is so much—a deluge of evidence that a second Trump administration would be far darker, far more dangerous, and far closer to fascism and authoritarianism than the first one was. Like a wounded animal that is CORNERED, Trump has no other way out. It’s not difficult to see the signs. What’s difficult is understanding how so many people are able to ignore the truth that is in front of us." It’s all been laid out in order see2 . Stop lying . Stop lying, that was her word not mine and AFAICS it was the only part of her post that was her opinion. i.e. it counted for nothing. You were debating with me not with her. I was questioning a point you posted . Now you have been found lying , you are trying to wriggle out of it . |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 17, 2024 21:09:43 GMT
This was your original post “On her Civil Discourse Substack platform, the former prosecutor wrote, "There is so much—a deluge of evidence that a second Trump administration would be far darker, far more dangerous, and far closer to fascism and authoritarianism than the first one was. Like a wounded animal that is CORNERED, Trump has no other way out. It’s not difficult to see the signs. What’s difficult is understanding how so many people are able to ignore the truth that is in front of us." It’s all been laid out in order see2 . Stop lying . Stop lying, that was her word not mine and AFAICS it was the only part of her post that was her opinion. i.e. it counted for nothing. You were debating with me not with her. I started to have a prang of conscience calling you a 'silly old fool', but given further developments 'joking' about 'suicide' and laughing at 'Fairy' gays, I'm not that arsed any more, you silly old fool. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 17, 2024 21:12:59 GMT
Stop lying, that was her word not mine and AFAICS it was the only part of her post that was her opinion. i.e. it counted for nothing. You were debating with me not with her. I started to have a prang of conscience calling you a 'silly old fool', but given further developments 'joking' about 'suicide' and laughing at 'Fairy' gays, I'm not that arsed any more, you silly old fool. Yup . He posts , he doesn’t remember what he posts , he shoots himself , he tries to separate himself from the post . Its dishonest and stupid . |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 17, 2024 22:11:34 GMT
So you believe that 'her' truth is 'your' truthAll that means is that you both hold the same opinion Don't put your words in my mouth. I just quoted what she said. As she has a history in the legal system she does have a better understanding of this issue than either you or me. i.e. hers is "an educated comment" not just "her opinion".What is the difference? Every day people ask Lawyers for a 'Legal Opinion' - should they ask for an 'Educated Comment'? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 17, 2024 23:01:29 GMT
Stop lying, that was her word not mine and AFAICS it was the only part of her post that was her opinion. i.e. it counted for nothing. You were debating with me not with her. I was questioning a point you posted . Now you have been found lying , you are trying to wriggle out of it . Her OP comment was about Trump, not about a word she used in a very short piece of opinion. It was stupid of you to pick it up and use it without reference. But knowing you, I should have guessed. So stop lying about me. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 17, 2024 23:05:06 GMT
I was questioning a point you posted . Now you have been found lying , you are trying to wriggle out of it . Her OP comment was about Trump, not about a word she used in a very short piece of opinion. It was stupid of you to pick it up and use it without reference. But knowing you, I should have guessed. So stop lying about me. I did have reference . You didn’t even realise the content of your original post. I laid it out for you and you still lie to save face . Go back to my post where I cut and paste both the posts and the links . |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 17, 2024 23:07:49 GMT
Don't put your words in my mouth. I just quoted what she said. As she has a history in the legal system she does have a better understanding of this issue than either you or me. i.e. hers is "an educated comment" not just "her opinion".What is the difference? Every day people ask Lawyers for a 'Legal Opinion' - should they ask for an 'Educated Comment'? What are you rambling on about now? Age must be catching up with you if you can't remember the difference between an educated comment and personal opinion from a lesser informed individual. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 17, 2024 23:18:01 GMT
Her OP comment was about Trump, not about a word she used in a very short piece of opinion. It was stupid of you to pick it up and use it without reference. But knowing you, I should have guessed. So stop lying about me. I did have reference . You didn’t even realise the content of your original post. I laid it out for you and you still lie to save face . Go back to my post where I cut and paste both the posts and the links . No reference in your original post. I acknowledged that I used the wrong word 'concerned' instead of 'cornered'. I used it because it was logical that you were referring to the major part of the post about Trump. I didn't make allowances for your immaturity. You are just an argumentative idiot. Try growing up you might even enjoy it LOL Bye. You might have guessed by now that I don't read your follow up post after I post Bye |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 17, 2024 23:19:07 GMT
What is the difference? Every day people ask Lawyers for a 'Legal Opinion' - should they ask for an 'Educated Comment'? What are you rambling on about now? Age must be catching up with you if you can't remember the difference between an educated comment and personal opinion from a lesser informed individual. She is a political opponent - political opponents will (and do) say anything to disparage their opponents. There is nothing educated about it except to the gullible.. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 17, 2024 23:20:42 GMT
Stop lying, that was her word not mine and AFAICS it was the only part of her post that was her opinion. i.e. it counted for nothing. You were debating with me not with her. I started to have a prang of conscience calling you a 'silly old fool', but given further developments 'joking' about 'suicide' and laughing at 'Fairy' gays, I'm not that arsed any more, you silly old fool. I like it when your post exposes that you are a knob head ^^^ LOL |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 17, 2024 23:27:20 GMT
What are you rambling on about now? Age must be catching up with you if you can't remember the difference between an educated comment and personal opinion from a lesser informed individual. She is a political opponent - political opponents will (and do) say anything to disparage their opponents. There is nothing educated about it except to the gullible.. She has experience in the legal side of these matters, therefore an educated comment. If you are looking for the gullible just look at the Trump supporters and those who seek to defend him. Your ability to ignore the obvious and choose instead to delve into your political bias, should be of some concern to you. If you disagree with her comments that is what you should be addressing. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 18, 2024 0:16:13 GMT
I did have reference . You didn’t even realise the content of your original post. I laid it out for you and you still lie to save face . Go back to my post where I cut and paste both the posts and the links . No reference in your original post. I acknowledged that I used the wrong word 'concerned' instead of 'cornered'. I used it because it was logical that you were referring to the major part of the post about Trump. I didn't make allowances for your immaturity. You are just an argumentative idiot. Try growing up you might even enjoy it LOL Bye. You might have guessed by now that I don't read your follow up post after I post Bye Don’t lie. It was your original post . You never read your original post. You are a liar . |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 18, 2024 17:25:24 GMT
The first one asks if Trump would bang her . Trump says no . As far as the link goes the only one talking about sex with 12 year olds is a shock jock . No one has claimed Trump had sex with underage girls pimped by Trump . The fact is that older rich men have sex with young women . We are talking about a shock jock asking Trump if he wanted to bang a 12 year old Paris Hilton . He said no . I find it more disturbing that someone would even ask that question. It was a perfectly good question, with Trump's background he needed to be on his toes to make sure he gave an acceptable answer. So he did, but it was a rather subdued answer after his brag about putting his hand down females knickers, just because he could. 'When you are wealthy you can do that sort of thing, they just let you'. He is just a big nasty kid. |
|
