|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Nov 19, 2023 12:18:03 GMT
With the Rwanda option now effectively cancelled, the government is facing a dilemma about what to do with the tens of thousands of small boat arrivals from whom asylum claims are not being accepted, and who are then considered as illegal entrants per the 2023 Act.
According to a report in the Sunday Times the preferred option in the Home Office was an amnesty, but this was vetoed by Suella Braverman before her sacking. With new management on the scene it appears amnesty is now the most likely option since deportation (or transfer to a 'safe' country) are now effectively ruled out.
PS In the year ending June 2023 there were 52,350 'irregular' migrants detected entering the UK; 85% of these arrived via small boats.
|
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Nov 19, 2023 13:15:37 GMT
Yes another amnesty, the last one was in the summer. Get here and dont worry about going back. Ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Nov 19, 2023 13:22:19 GMT
You refer I think to 'The Amnesty That Dare Not Say Its Name', the one Rishi has set in motion so he can claim to have met his pledge to clear the backlog by the end of this year.
Latest asylum stats are to be released this week. Look for a spectacular leap in the number of 'valid' claims.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 19, 2023 13:28:51 GMT
With the Rwanda option now effectively cancelled, the government is facing a dilemma about what to do with the tens of thousands of small boat arrivals from whom asylum claims are not being accepted, and who are then considered as illegal entrants per the 2023 Act. According to a report in the Sunday Times the preferred option in the Home Office was an amnesty, but this was vetoed by Suella Braverman before her sacking. With new management on the scene it appears amnesty is now the most likely option since deportation (or transfer to a 'safe' country) are now effectively ruled out.
PS In the year ending June 2023 there were 52,350 'irregular' migrants detected entering the UK; 85% of these arrived via small boats.
The Tories seem incapable of stopping illegal immigration and Labour have no intention of stopping illegal immigration. Just another reason to vote Reform UK. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2023 13:43:58 GMT
With the Rwanda option now effectively cancelled, the government is facing a dilemma about what to do with the tens of thousands of small boat arrivals from whom asylum claims are not being accepted, and who are then considered as illegal entrants per the 2023 Act. According to a report in the Sunday Times the preferred option in the Home Office was an amnesty, but this was vetoed by Suella Braverman before her sacking. With new management on the scene it appears amnesty is now the most likely option since deportation (or transfer to a 'safe' country) are now effectively ruled out.
PS In the year ending June 2023 there were 52,350 'irregular' migrants detected entering the UK; 85% of these arrived via small boats.
The Tories seem incapable of stopping illegal immigration and Labour have no intention of stopping illegal immigration. Just another reason to vote Reform UK. Labour plan to open asylum processing centres in France, which the French have said we can, that is hardly "no intention". |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 19, 2023 13:45:24 GMT
The Tories seem incapable of stopping illegal immigration and Labour have no intention of stopping illegal immigration. Just another reason to vote Reform UK. Labour plan to open asylum processing centres in France, which the French have said we can, that is hardly "no intention". Oh ffs get a grip. All Labours plan will achieve is migrants boarding ferries rather than dinghies. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2023 13:55:34 GMT
Labour plan to open asylum processing centres in France, which the French have said we can, that is hardly "no intention". Oh ffs get a grip. All Labours plan will achieve is migrants boarding ferries rather than dinghies. You cannot have "no intention" to deal with immigration when they have a plan. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Nov 19, 2023 14:03:03 GMT
What is Labour's plan for dealing with asylum seekers whose claim is refused?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 19, 2023 14:13:41 GMT
What is Labour's plan for dealing with asylum seekers whose claim is refused? Oh I know this one... Is it... An amnesty?  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2023 14:22:59 GMT
What is Labour's plan for dealing with asylum seekers whose claim is refused? They stay in France. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 19, 2023 14:25:16 GMT
Oh ffs get a grip. All Labours plan will achieve is migrants boarding ferries rather than dinghies. You cannot have "no intention" to deal with immigration when they have a plan. I didn't think it would be necessary to spell it out, silly me. Redders, Labours plan is to relax the rules, such as they are, and fast track illegals who claim to refugees directly from the EU to England. This will stop the dinghies, hugely reduce asylum queues, and massively increase the UK (Mainly English) population. This will very much please outraged lefties and Starmers bosses in Brussels who behind closed doors will quietly relax many other rules. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2023 14:32:08 GMT
You cannot have "no intention" to deal with immigration when they have a plan. I didn't think it would be necessary to spell it out, silly me. Redders, Labours plan is to relax the rules, such as they are, and fast track illegals who claim to refugees directly from the EU to England. This will stop the dinghies, hugely reduce asylum queues, and massively increase the UK (Mainly English) population. This will very much please outraged lefties and Starmers bosses in Brussels who behind closed doors will quietly relax many other rules. Have you heard that plan specifically stated? Or is it 'because it is Labour it must be so'? |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Nov 19, 2023 14:38:09 GMT
What is Labour's plan for dealing with asylum seekers whose claim is refused? They stay in France. Given that Labour's plan for a 'one-stop shop' is likely to attract many more asylum shoppers than currently attempt to cross the Channel in small boats I can't see the French being very thrilled about having the rejects dumped on them.
Has this been properly thought through?
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 19, 2023 14:38:44 GMT
What is Labour's plan for dealing with asylum seekers whose claim is refused? You think Labour will refuse asylum claims? Ever the optimist eh Dan. |
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Nov 19, 2023 14:39:38 GMT
What is Labour's plan for dealing with asylum seekers whose claim is refused? There will be no such plan as nobody will be refused |
|
