|
Post by sandypine on Oct 12, 2023 18:28:33 GMT
NOAA has released its September 2023 Contiguous U.S. USCRN temperature anomaly data shown below with the years 2015, 2019, 2021 and 2022 recorded USCRN September temperature anomaly data exceeding the year 2023 September 1.93 F value. This data is from the state-of-the-art U.S. Climate Reference Network which has all of their stations properly sited away from heat sources/biases by design. Zany look away now wattsupwiththat.com/2023/10/12/noaa-u-s-contiguous-uscrn-temperature-anomaly-september-2023-data-shows-no-climate-emergency/It is especially interesting that these stations were set up almost 20 years ago to eliminate the possible (and often shown) bias caused by Urban Heat Islands. This set of figures is rarely reported in the MSN yet is one of the most important group of results as it takes out one of the main arguments against the scale of global warming in that corruption of the temperature has occurred. It seems they have cleared it up so far but it does not give the result they expected/hoped for.
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Oct 13, 2023 6:14:24 GMT
As I've said before there's an inbuilt bias for warming because weather stations have gradually become more urbanised. So you would expect their temperature recordings to indicate warming. It looks as if, when the UHI effect is properly eliminated there isn't any warming. This is actually what a scientist on Richard Tice's program a few months ago said. He also adjusted for the UHI effect.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Oct 13, 2023 13:57:09 GMT
As I've said before there's an inbuilt bias for warming because weather stations have gradually become more urbanised. So you would expect their temperature recordings to indicate warming. It looks as if, when the UHI effect is properly eliminated there isn't any warming. This is actually what a scientist on Richard Tice's program a few months ago said. He also adjusted for the UHI effect. However no one is interested in anything that runs counter to their preferred narrative. The planet is warming, we can control the climate by controlling people. Perhaps controlling people is the primary motivator and not a seemingly dodgy climate emergency. Anything that indicates the emergency is'nt is dismissed as crank science even when it is taken direct from the purveyors of accepted science. It is very worrying.
|
|