|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 6, 2023 11:30:23 GMT
Well that other person Huricane Braverman is in the firing line too,just watching QT ( someone has to lol) and she as being slated for her words. Why I don’t know because it is factually correct that the movement of people will become the equivalent of a hurricane,saying so is not racist but accepting a hard truth. Said it before difficult choices will need to be made and as someone pointed out on QT Macron and others in Europe have said the same are they all racists and right wing populists? Here's a scenario:
Given the number of ethnic minority cabinet members, has there already been a takeover?
And is Braverman just guiding the herd to ignore and look beyond what has actually happened by suggesting they worry about what might happen if a few flights to Rwanda aren't allowed to go ahead...? These 'ethnic minority cabinet members' you speak of, regardless of colour have worked hard to get where they are, and they speak the same language as most of us so called privilied white people. They too do not want the UK flooded with illegal migrants hopping on dinghy's from France.
What we are getting are thousands of 'young single males', who aren't arriving via their dinghy with the thoughts of making good for themselves and maybe one day they might become a cabinet minister. We're getting layabouts and freeloaders who have no intentions of working in the UK, they'll either turn to crime to fund themselves, or get some white naive girl up the duff and then hope he can stay legally.
They are working the system, otherwise they would apply to live in the UK legally, if they were genuine economic migrants, they are just chancers who want to abuse our good generous nature.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 6, 2023 11:48:44 GMT
I recognise your limited ability to apply your thinking beyond the superficial, even after explanation. Incidentally, did you ever grasp the importance of 'Context' after I pointed it out some time back? There was no context . You merely posted waffle that you thought up on the fly . You never explained , you only excused. Why dont you go and haunt someone else instead of posting your waffle in replies to my posts ? My question on context was not about this thread, I made that obvious. I did explain my post, that (I suspect) you chose not to understand it, is the problem. If you post nonsense on an open forum, I am perfectly entitled to question or comment on it. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 6, 2023 12:08:32 GMT
There was no context . You merely posted waffle that you thought up on the fly . You never explained , you only excused. Why dont you go and haunt someone else instead of posting your waffle in replies to my posts ? My question on context was not about this thread, I made that obvious. I did explain my post, that (I suspect) you chose not to understand it, is the problem. If you post nonsense on an open forum, I am perfectly entitled to question or comment on it. Your reply had nothing to do with the post you replied to. You waffled . You got caught out and as usual you post waffle to hide your waffle. Your last sentence your usual projection . Go and bother someone who likes it . |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Oct 6, 2023 12:17:28 GMT
Well that other person Huricane Braverman is in the firing line too,just watching QT ( someone has to lol) and she as being slated for her words. Why I don’t know because it is factually correct that the movement of people will become the equivalent of a hurricane,saying so is not racist but accepting a hard truth. Said it before difficult choices will need to be made and as someone pointed out on QT Macron and others in Europe have said the same are they all racists and right wing populists? Here's a scenario:
Given the number of ethnic minority cabinet members, has there already been a takeover?
And is Braverman just guiding the herd to ignore and look beyond what has actually happened by suggesting they worry about what might happen if a few flights to Rwanda aren't allowed to go ahead...? Don’t think so Pat,I know a few people who came to this country or parents did decades ago and they are as concerned. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 6, 2023 12:26:47 GMT
Here's a scenario:
Given the number of ethnic minority cabinet members, has there already been a takeover?
And is Braverman just guiding the herd to ignore and look beyond what has actually happened by suggesting they worry about what might happen if a few flights to Rwanda aren't allowed to go ahead...? Don’t think so Pat,I know a few people who came to this country or parents did decades ago and they are as concerned. It's strange how pat can make a condescending remark like ...'Given the number of ethnic minority cabinet members, has there already been a takeover'?, obviously aimed as a slur against the Tories.
While in the same breath trying to condemn those who want to send ethnics to Rwanda, I wish lefties would make their mind up, they either support all 'ethnics' of all social standing, instead of cherry picking the ones that have made good and aren't going along with the racist UK narrative, by trying to discredit them.
|
|
|
|
Post by borchester on Oct 6, 2023 12:31:34 GMT
The left were inclined to say that Maggie Thatcher was a woman, but not a sister. The fact that she wiped the floor with them passed them by
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Oct 6, 2023 19:44:27 GMT
The left were inclined to say that Maggie Thatcher was a woman, but not a sister. The fact that she wiped the floor with them passed them by Then they buried her — that’s how most political ambitions eventually end… |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Oct 6, 2023 19:52:00 GMT
Here's a scenario:
Given the number of ethnic minority cabinet members, has there already been a takeover?
And is Braverman just guiding the herd to ignore and look beyond what has actually happened by suggesting they worry about what might happen if a few flights to Rwanda aren't allowed to go ahead...? Don’t think so Pat,I know a few people who came to this country or parents did decades ago and they are as concerned. I also know a few similar people — they’re also concerned, mainly about if it’s likely to be their ultimate fate… |
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Oct 6, 2023 20:52:57 GMT
So she is repeating Tory propaganda with no substantive proof of anything. No wonder Cons like it. No substantive proof of anything? So the Danes and Swedes have suddenly turned in to right wing racist fanatics,and leaders like Macron have too. You are the one in denial and the delusional idea that this is not happening. Sorry but do tell us exactly how Macron has turned into a right wing racist fanatic. I thought that was the popular identity of LePen. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Oct 6, 2023 22:00:07 GMT
No substantive proof of anything? So the Danes and Swedes have suddenly turned in to right wing racist fanatics,and leaders like Macron have too. You are the one in denial and the delusional idea that this is not happening. Sorry but do tell us exactly how Macron has turned into a right wing racist fanatic. I thought that was the popular identity of LePen. So you can’t understand that Macron and others have expressed their concern over the numbers rising and the liberal society’s in Denmark and Sweden are pushing back. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 6, 2023 23:45:47 GMT
Duplicate post
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 6, 2023 23:46:40 GMT
Please note I haven't commented on this as someone gets very upset..Question Time racism row as BBC deletes clip of Fiona Bruce referring to audience member as 'black guy' while presenter apologises for 'causing offence' Fiona Bruce referred to Question Time audience member as a 'black guy' She and BBC have apologised after racism row was sparked over her description Topical news panel show Question Time has been thrown into a race row after the BBC deleted a clip of Fiona Bruce referring to an audience member as a 'black guy'. In Thursday night's broadcast of the show on BBC One, the host asked a man from the audience to put his question to the panel - but her racial description was edited out when it was uploaded to iPlayer. Ms Bruce, 59, and the BBC have now apologised for causing offence for her remarks, with the presenter saying it was 'wrong to identify him as I did'. There did not appear to be an immediate reaction to her comment by the man in question or anybody else in the audience. However, the remarks drew fury from some on social media, including former chief prosecutor Nazir Afzal, who posted the original clip on X, formerly Twitter, writing: 'Let's hear from the "black guy"'. She had asked the audience in Wolverhampton: 'Is it right to ban mobile phones in schools?' www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12603331/Question-Time-racism-row-BBC-Fiona-Bruce-black-guy.html |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 7, 2023 9:05:14 GMT
Please note I haven't commented on this as someone gets very upset..Question Time racism row as BBC deletes clip of Fiona Bruce referring to audience member as 'black guy' while presenter apologises for 'causing offence' Fiona Bruce referred to Question Time audience member as a 'black guy' She and BBC have apologised after racism row was sparked over her description Topical news panel show Question Time has been thrown into a race row after the BBC deleted a clip of Fiona Bruce referring to an audience member as a 'black guy'. In Thursday night's broadcast of the show on BBC One, the host asked a man from the audience to put his question to the panel - but her racial description was edited out when it was uploaded to iPlayer. Ms Bruce, 59, and the BBC have now apologised for causing offence for her remarks, with the presenter saying it was 'wrong to identify him as I did'. There did not appear to be an immediate reaction to her comment by the man in question or anybody else in the audience. However, the remarks drew fury from some on social media, including former chief prosecutor Nazir Afzal, who posted the original clip on X, formerly Twitter, writing: 'Let's hear from the "black guy"'. She had asked the audience in Wolverhampton: 'Is it right to ban mobile phones in schools?' www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12603331/Question-Time-racism-row-BBC-Fiona-Bruce-black-guy.html I've only just read this, and the 'black guy' or members off the audience even turned a hair when she said it, it's the usual race baiting BBC lefties running the show as usual, like Kemi said all they want to do is create division and stoke racism.
The lefties told us black people don't want to be called 'brown people' it has racial overtones, they want to be referred to as 'black people', so now when you call them black people you are still being a racist, these lefties who speak on behalf of others are doing them a great injustice, they are nothing but race baiting trouble makers.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 7, 2023 9:32:15 GMT
Are they? The party you refer to has David Lammy and others as members. Why should they be rattled about Ms. Badenoch? I know the Cons are a dead lightbulb but why do you have to write such assumptive drivel? Because she said what they didn't want to hear...
Speaking at the Conservative Party’s annual conference in Manchester, Business and Trade Secretary Badenoch — seen as a potential future leader of the Tories — accused Labour of trying to “bend the knee” before an “altar of intolerance” and of peddling a “narrative of hopelessness” among ethnic minority communities. In her speech to the Tory faithful, Badenoch argued that Labour wants to stoke racial divisions in the U.K. and said she tells her children the U.K. “is the best country in the world to be Black — because it’s a country that sees people, not labels.”
and best of all “Let Labour bend the knee before this altar of intolerance. We’ll keep building a country that is, in every way, stronger and fairer for all,” she added.
Remember Rayner and Starmer virtue woke signalling for BLM.
She was absolutely spot on.
, exactly the sort of shit that keeps the Tory party alive, and the sort of shit that naive Tories rejoice in. Insinuation, denigration and lies, its all part of the Tory Party DNA. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 7, 2023 9:35:50 GMT
My question on context was not about this thread, I made that obvious. I did explain my post, that (I suspect) you chose not to understand it, is the problem. If you post nonsense on an open forum, I am perfectly entitled to question or comment on it. Your reply had nothing to do with the post you replied to. You waffled . You got caught out and as usual you post waffle to hide your waffle. Your last sentence your usual projection . Go and bother someone who likes it . Stop telling lies, its the waffling that goes on between your ears that is the problem. You are just not man enough to acknowledge it when you get things wrong. |
|
