|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 27, 2023 19:55:26 GMT
In flame of pure hydrogen burning in air, the hydrogen (H2) reacts with oxygen (O2) to form water (H2O) with the release of energy. In atmospheric air rather than pure oxygen, hydrogen combustion may yield a small amount of nitrogen oxides with the water vapor. WATER is the result of burning hydrogen in air. If you watch this vid from about 23 onwards. Bio fuel boilers this is one way forward.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2023 20:53:31 GMT
Yes, I've seen pellet burners in action. They are not too expensive to install and they are very good at producing heat. They can be plumbed to radiator, I believe, but the one I saw was in an open plan house where it heated the whole house.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 27, 2023 23:52:07 GMT
Brexit Britain's e-vehicle boom provokes panicked revolt in EUSSR over revenge tariff plans EXCLUSIVE: Brexit Britain's success in cornering key parts of the e-vehicle market has led to demands that the EUSSR delays imposing tariffs on UK-built models. Member states in the EUSSR are revolting against Ursula von der Leyen's plans to impose revenge tariffs on Brexit Britain on the import of e-vehicles. The row has broken out because the UK has cornered key parts of the international e-vehicle market, including becoming the pivotal point in the supply chain for rare minerals needed for batteries. The EUSSR Commission led by von der Leyen had wanted to press ahead with punitive tariffs which would cost exporters from the UK millions in revenge for Brexit. But Director General of the Institute of Export and International Trade (IOE&IT) Marco Forgione, who regularly attends meetings in the EUSSR and is consulted by Kemi Badenoch's department, says that member states are pushing back on the plans. They fear that a lack of capacity in EUSSR e-vehicle production and key supply chains will leave them short as they attempt to reach their 2050 Net Zero targets on carbon emissions. www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1817113/brexit-e-vehicle-brussel-bureaucrats-revenge-revolt |
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Sept 28, 2023 6:47:00 GMT
Sorry but I don't need to read some bollocks from "cummins" whoever they are about how hydrogen can be used as an energy source. The facts are very simple - and I've explained them to you already. I'm well aware that trials are going on to use part hydrogen/ part natural gas in boilers. I'm also well aware that the govt spent a lot of money encouraging motorists to buy diesel cars (because they generate slightly less CO2 than petrol), but they found that it made all of our major cities in breach of pollution regulations - and the pollution is deadly NO2. So the govt are making the same mistake again - what a surprise. Unfortunately burning hydrogen in air produces even more pollution than a diesel engine. Since domestic heating accounts for far more energy than cars the polltion that hydrogen boiler produce will be far more than diesel engines.. The science is pretty simple Patman. Burning hydrogen generates a lot long lasting pollution and generates far less energy than it cost to produce. That's why it makes no sense. Going all-electric (for heating and cars) actually DOES make sense but the amount of upgrading to the National Grid required will take decades and cost hundreds of billions - it'll make HS2 seem cheap. You shouldn't be so naive as to be fooled by these "dead cats" that the govt chucks on the table every now and then to make people think they're doing something. I can assure you that I’m less likely to be fooled by the rants of the mistakenly obsessed (or lobbyists), than I am to be informed by the activities and views of leading developers in the technologies that are most affected by governments’ plans… I'm telling the scientific facts. Burning hydrogen in boilers will result in large amounts of NOX - that's N2O, NO and NO2 all of which are poisonous. The reason that diesel engines produce NOX is because the higher compression ratios generates higher temperatures which cause the nitrogen in the air to be oxidised. The amount of NO2 produced was sufficient to make the air in most of our cities in breach of NOX regulations. But the amount of NOX produced by diesel engines is a fraction of what's produced by burning hydrogen in air. Wake up. |
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Sept 28, 2023 6:58:08 GMT
In flame of pure hydrogen burning in air, the hydrogen (H2) reacts with oxygen (O2) to form water (H2O) with the release of energy. In atmospheric air rather than pure oxygen, hydrogen combustion may yield a small amount of nitrogen oxides with the water vapor. WATER is the result of burning hydrogen in air. Burning hydrogen in air produces energy, water, N2O, NO and NO2 (NOX). The NOX is poisonous and is generated in far greater quantities than that generated by a diesel engine (for equivalent energy release). But the even bigger problem is the fact that burning hydrogen releases only about 35% of the energy (in a combustion engine) that was needed to generate the hydrogen in the first place. So what's the point of using large amounts of electricity to generate hydrogen and then burning it - when you can use the electricity directly and get nearly 100% of the energy? |
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Sept 28, 2023 6:59:41 GMT
In flame of pure hydrogen burning in air, the hydrogen (H2) reacts with oxygen (O2) to form water (H2O) with the release of energy. In atmospheric air rather than pure oxygen, hydrogen combustion may yield a small amount of nitrogen oxides with the water vapor. WATER is the result of burning hydrogen in air. If you watch this vid from about 23 onwards. Bio fuel boilers this is one way forward.
The energy required to make wood pellets means that they generate more CO2 tan virtually any other fuel. Read the Chatham House report on Drax. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 28, 2023 7:22:11 GMT
If you watch this vid from about 23 onwards. Bio fuel boilers this is one way forward.
The energy required to make wood pellets means that they generate more CO2 tan virtually any other fuel. Read the Chatham House report on Drax. Drax are one of the major producers and suppliers of Bio Pellets..
|
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Sept 28, 2023 8:10:34 GMT
Read the Chatham House report. Biomass is the biggest green con there is. It generates more CO2 than coal. But it's classed as a renewable so it helps our daft govt meeting targets.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 28, 2023 10:32:16 GMT
Read the Chatham House report. Biomass is the biggest green con there is. It generates more CO2 than coal. But it's classed as a renewable so it helps our daft govt meeting targets. To be honest mate I don't pay much heed to Chatham house they are just another charity with an edge. |
|
