|
Post by zanygame on Sept 24, 2023 7:02:46 GMT
As I read the Daily Mail article I noticed the familiar styling. Let me show you how they work. DM: Ofsted boss warns that regulator is powerless to sanction schools teaching children as young as 12 about 'gender unicorns' and anal sex Doesn't say anal sex was taught anywhere, just that Ofsted has no say in it- after investigation into 'age-inappropriate' sex-ed classes Implies the inappropriate teaching was anal sex, without actually saying it was. It comes after a Daily Telegraph investigation found some academies and independent schools were teaching pupils about 'gender unicorns' and asking children as young as 12 how they felt about anal and oral sex.
With no context. Were these children being warned of the dangers of paedophiles or how to do oral and anal sex.
But most importantly how many academies? 1 2? I hate the implied things these papers state as if they are facts. You probably don't agree with me, but I would ask that you try to read between the lines. Our children are being coached by a politcal agenda. Leave the kids alone for them to grow up and make their own decisions. Yes they are, but its always been the case, right back to the days of being taught to respect your betters. So the difference is what politics they are being taught. I would agree kids are growing up to quick, but I think that's social media.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Sept 24, 2023 7:54:44 GMT
My view on Zany's stances.
Zany's political position seems to have a couple of core pivot points -
1) Western countries / populations should be hobbled so they can't sensibly compete and their populations should become impoverished, dependent and powerless. 2) Western countries should be subject to very large (effectively limitless) amounts of immigration, despite the wishes of their populations. Zany will claim this isn't his position, but will also tenaciously resist any resolution that avoids it as a likely consequence.
The rest of his position is window dressing around that core and all of his principle political positions have the above two as consequences. This is why people in conversation with Zany will often get a "you can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead" feeling. Zany may occasionally look like he is conceding but the core position always remains in situ and unmoved. The zany horse will not drink, no matter how close you move him to the water.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2023 12:39:01 GMT
My view on Zany's stances. Zany's political position seems to have a couple of core pivot points - 1) Western countries / populations should be hobbled so they can't sensibly compete and their populations should become impoverished, dependent and powerless. 2) Western countries should be subject to very large (effectively limitless) amounts of immigration, despite the wishes of their populations. Zany will claim this isn't his position, but will also tenaciously resist any resolution that avoids it as a likely consequence. The rest of his position is window dressing around that core and all of his principle political positions have the above two as consequences. This is why people in conversation with Zany will often get a "you can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead" feeling. Zany may occasionally look like he is conceding but the core position always remains in situ and unmoved. The zany horse will not drink, no matter how close you move him to the water. He hates the British people and wants them to die for his preferences, whilst reporting everyone into silence. Blairism is very evil and dishonest. Even this forum is crawling with its deranged liars.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 24, 2023 14:32:05 GMT
My view on Zany's stances. Zany's political position seems to have a couple of core pivot points - 1) Western countries / populations should be hobbled so they can't sensibly compete and their populations should become impoverished, dependent and powerless. 2) Western countries should be subject to very large (effectively limitless) amounts of immigration, despite the wishes of their populations. Zany will claim this isn't his position, but will also tenaciously resist any resolution that avoids it as a likely consequence. The rest of his position is window dressing around that core and all of his principle political positions have the above two as consequences. This is why people in conversation with Zany will often get a "you can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead" feeling. Zany may occasionally look like he is conceding but the core position always remains in situ and unmoved. The zany horse will not drink, no matter how close you move him to the water. He hates the British people and wants them to die for his preferences, whilst reporting everyone into silence. Blairism is very evil and dishonest. Even this forum is crawling with its deranged liars.
One thing that is deranged is to post extremely biased lying opinions denigrating others without the possibility of being able to back up those rather foolish opinions. Such an approach does seem to taint many opinions posted by Righties. All they manage to do is to expose the weaknesses in the thought levels of many Righties.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Sept 24, 2023 14:35:01 GMT
He hates the British people and wants them to die for his preferences, whilst reporting everyone into silence. Blairism is very evil and dishonest. Even this forum is crawling with its deranged liars.
One thing that is deranged is to post extremely biased lying opinions denigrating others without the possibility of being able to back up those rather foolish opinions. Such an approach does seem to taint many opinions posted by Righties. All they manage to do is to expose the weaknesses in the thought levels of Righties. Easily led comes to mind. I don't know about you see2 but I find this care in the community lark, rather tiring. How are things in the stately home?
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 24, 2023 14:37:11 GMT
He hates the British people and wants them to die for his preferences, whilst reporting everyone into silence. Blairism is very evil and dishonest. Even this forum is crawling with its deranged liars.
One thing that is deranged is to post extremely biased lying opinions denigrating others without the possibility of being able to back up those rather foolish opinions. Such an approach does seem to taint many opinions posted by Righties. All they manage to do is to expose the weaknesses in the thought levels of Righties. Easily led comes to mind. You do have to wonder why people support positions that will see a dramatic change to Britain and the British with all the offshoot policies as regards revising history, white privilege etc. The conclusion easily reached is that the Britain that was must have been either hated or seen to be intrinsically lacking and as such change was seen to be good. It would have been nice to present those policies as options for the electorate to consider as I am pretty certain they would have been rejected.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 24, 2023 15:05:10 GMT
One thing that is deranged is to post extremely biased lying opinions denigrating others without the possibility of being able to back up those rather foolish opinions. Such an approach does seem to taint many opinions posted by Righties. All they manage to do is to expose the weaknesses in the thought levels of Righties. Easily led comes to mind. You do have to wonder why people support positions that will see a dramatic change to Britain and the British with all the offshoot policies as regards revising history, white privilege etc. The conclusion easily reached is that the Britain that was must have been either hated or seen to be intrinsically lacking and as such change was seen to be good. It would have been nice to present those policies as options for the electorate to consider as I am pretty certain they would have been rejected. I disagree with your conclusion because IMO it is the least likely cause for people supporting the acceptance of the 'asylum seekers'. The most likely support of these migrants is concern for human being. Having said that I have no doubt that accepting the numbers of asylum(?) seekers into Europe, will cause decades into the future, of problems for Europe. I have no wish to see cultures being overwhelmed or standards of living falling or what is in my opinion the threat of the most self indoctrinating religion, Islam, expanding in Europe, and for me expanding in the UK.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 24, 2023 15:36:29 GMT
You do have to wonder why people support positions that will see a dramatic change to Britain and the British with all the offshoot policies as regards revising history, white privilege etc. The conclusion easily reached is that the Britain that was must have been either hated or seen to be intrinsically lacking and as such change was seen to be good. It would have been nice to present those policies as options for the electorate to consider as I am pretty certain they would have been rejected. I disagree with your conclusion because IMO it is the least likely cause for people supporting the acceptance of the 'asylum seekers'. The most likely support of these migrants is concern for human being. Having said that I have no doubt that accepting the numbers of asylum(?) seekers into Europe, will cause decades into the future, of problems for Europe. I have no wish to see cultures being overwhelmed or standards of living falling or what is in my opinion the threat of the most self indoctrinating religion, Islam, expanding in Europe, and for me expanding in the UK. Which is slightly contradictory, we must do this although it will potentially result in our demise. The balance of the concerns favours the migrants and ignores the British people whose concerns are dismissed as ...well...racist. However I was viewing all policies that have led us to here and the insistence that immigration enriches and adds to the UK has been less noticeable of late as it is much harder to defend. It does seem as though a hatered of Britian as it was is the only reason why one should wish to change it so dramatically within a short period of time.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 24, 2023 15:54:05 GMT
I disagree with your conclusion because IMO it is the least likely cause for people supporting the acceptance of the 'asylum seekers'. The most likely support of these migrants is concern for human being. Having said that I have no doubt that accepting the numbers of asylum(?) seekers into Europe, will cause decades into the future, of problems for Europe. I have no wish to see cultures being overwhelmed or standards of living falling or what is in my opinion the threat of the most self indoctrinating religion, Islam, expanding in Europe, and for me expanding in the UK. Which is slightly contradictory, we must do this although it will potentially result in our demise. The balance of the concerns favours the migrants and ignores the British people whose concerns are dismissed as ...well...racist. However I was viewing all policies that have led us to here and the insistence that immigration enriches and adds to the UK has been less noticeable of late as it is much harder to defend. It does seem as though a hatered of Britian as it was is the only reason why one should wish to change it so dramatically within a short period of time. As far as I'm aware there is no wish to change the country so dramatically, Europe including the UK are hamstrung by being led by the ECHR, (by the way, nothing to do with the EU).
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 24, 2023 18:38:06 GMT
Which is slightly contradictory, we must do this although it will potentially result in our demise. The balance of the concerns favours the migrants and ignores the British people whose concerns are dismissed as ...well...racist. However I was viewing all policies that have led us to here and the insistence that immigration enriches and adds to the UK has been less noticeable of late as it is much harder to defend. It does seem as though a hatered of Britian as it was is the only reason why one should wish to change it so dramatically within a short period of time. As far as I'm aware there is no wish to change the country so dramatically, Europe including the UK are hamstrung by being led by the ECHR, (by the way, nothing to do with the EU). Changing the country so dramatically is however what is happening. I am not sure that International law demands some sort of self immolation of a population, if it does then it becomes bad law that most populations should resist. It still does make it a strange belief that we must do something that is so contrary to our well being that a dislike of what exists seems the only logical explanation as to why such a situation is not just allowed to exist but in fact encouraged to exist. The ECHR is like the EU a supranational power above the democratic wishes on any National population which makes both forms of dictatorship.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 25, 2023 13:48:57 GMT
Marine Le Pen gains three seats at French senate election in humiliation for Micron Marine Le Pen gained three seats at the French senate elections amid a growing right wing rave sweeping across Europe, in what can be seen as a major humiliation for Emmanuel Micron. At last night's French senate election, Le Pen's far-right National Rally had a breakthrough, getting three of its candidates elected. Meanwhile, the election served a major blow to Emmanuel Micron, as the only member of his government running in the election - Secretary of State for Citizenship Sonia Backès - was defeated in the French territory of New Caledonia. The Senate is indirectly elected by France's mayors as well as regional, departmental and municipal councillors. Half of the Senate's 348 seats were being contested.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Sept 25, 2023 18:11:38 GMT
Marine Le Pen gains three seats at French senate election in humiliation for Micron Marine Le Pen gained three seats at the French senate elections amid a growing right wing rave sweeping across Europe, in what can be seen as a major humiliation for Emmanuel Micron. At last night's French senate election, Le Pen's far-right National Rally had a breakthrough, getting three of its candidates elected. Meanwhile, the election served a major blow to Emmanuel Micron, as the only member of his government running in the election - Secretary of State for Citizenship Sonia Backès - was defeated in the French territory of New Caledonia. The Senate is indirectly elected by France's mayors as well as regional, departmental and municipal councillors. Half of the Senate's 348 seats were being contested.
3 out of 348 doesn't sound that humiliating mate.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 25, 2023 18:23:20 GMT
Marine Le Pen gains three seats at French senate election in humiliation for Micron Marine Le Pen gained three seats at the French senate elections amid a growing right wing rave sweeping across Europe, in what can be seen as a major humiliation for Emmanuel Micron. At last night's French senate election, Le Pen's far-right National Rally had a breakthrough, getting three of its candidates elected. Meanwhile, the election served a major blow to Emmanuel Micron, as the only member of his government running in the election - Secretary of State for Citizenship Sonia Backès - was defeated in the French territory of New Caledonia. The Senate is indirectly elected by France's mayors as well as regional, departmental and municipal councillors. Half of the Senate's 348 seats were being contested.
3 out of 348 doesn't sound that humiliating mate. Well those in the know think it was. Just 1 vote against Micron rattles his cage. And how many of those seats were already in Marine Le Pens party? We all know she has been making some gains in France. over the last couple of years. To be honest the reporting from France is total shite.
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on Sept 25, 2023 18:26:00 GMT
The only country of interest for me next year is the Netherlands, the others I think are some way short of a majority.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Sept 25, 2023 19:06:01 GMT
3 out of 348 doesn't sound that humiliating mate. Well those in the know think it was. Just 1 vote against Micron rattles his cage. And how many of those seats were already in Marine Le Pens party? We all know she has been making some gains in France. over the last couple of years. To be honest the reporting from France is total shite. Fair do's I don't really follow the right wing, I'm just a soft leftie snowflake. Used to be a chippy though, for about 20 years . Before I went soft.
|
|