|
Post by Vinny on Sept 12, 2023 10:28:26 GMT
There are fake refugees. People from safe country bogus asylum seekers, illegal immigrants, call them what you will, but there are people who are falsely seeking asylum with no need to.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2023 14:18:53 GMT
There are fake refugees. People from safe country bogus asylum seekers, illegal immigrants, call them what you will, but there are people who are falsely seeking asylum with no need to. You said "illegitimate". No asylum seeker comes from a safe country, that's the point. "Illegal immigrants" are criminals that come to this country not asylum seekers. How do you know they are 'falsely claiming' asylum?
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Sept 12, 2023 14:41:55 GMT
There are fake refugees. People from safe country bogus asylum seekers, illegal immigrants, call them what you will, but there are people who are falsely seeking asylum with no need to. You said "illegitimate". No asylum seeker comes from a safe country, that's the point. "Illegal immigrants" are criminals that come to this country not asylum seekers. How do you know they are 'falsely claiming' asylum? Illegal immigrants come to this country and falsely seek asylum, get it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2023 16:26:44 GMT
You said "illegitimate". No asylum seeker comes from a safe country, that's the point. "Illegal immigrants" are criminals that come to this country not asylum seekers. How do you know they are 'falsely claiming' asylum? Illegal immigrants come to this country and falsely seek asylum, get it? An immigrant is someone that moves to another country to live and work, if a potential immigrant is found not to meet the criteria of the country they are seeking to enter they are refused entry. An asylum seeker is someone looking for sanctuary, if a person that claims asylum is found to be 'manipulating' the system they are refused entry to the country.
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on Sept 12, 2023 21:41:46 GMT
She would have used the RN to take them back by boat and we could do it today.
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Sept 12, 2023 22:56:10 GMT
Essentially that's ^ waffle. If Sunak invoked international law he would not be "doing what the fuck he likes". The government, any government, can invoke international law and/or alter, amend or withdraw from any existing law/s. Laws are introduced altered amended and repealed all the time. In spite of what you obviously think, man made laws are not is set in stone. You mention "the rest of Europe's leaders", who exactly are you talking about? Europe is governed by a cabal of unelected commissioners who sit behind closed doors in Brussels, these people are are the architects of the almighty cock up that is mass European immigration. Are you aware the EU imposed immigration quotas on every EU state and threatened huge fines for any state who refused? Perhaps this is why the EU are turning a blind eye to hundreds of thousands of illegals who are fleeing the safe state of France for England. Which is why Sunak should, and with a sense of urgency, invoke UN law to stop the illegal invasion which is a clear threat to this country. Now, you need to get your head out of your EU/minority appeasing arse so you are better able to see what the fuck is going on. You haven't answered my very simple question... I'll try again. If the answer is as simple as you are claiming, why is Sunak not doing it? The answer is... you are talking rubbish, because stopping the boats is literally the only thing he has left politically to avoid a landslide at the next election. So if he could do what you are suggesting he would. The fact you cannot see that is quite disturbing lol.
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Sept 12, 2023 22:58:39 GMT
She would have used the RN to take them back by boat and we could do it today. She would have sailed our warships into another countries waters without permission? Don't talk rubbish lol.
|
|