Would Thatcher have stopped the boats?..

If you believe Thatcher would have stopped the boats, how do you think she would have done it?

HMS Conqueror?

Thatcher would not have needed to stop the boats, there would have been none.

That's rubbish, you are factually wrong. 

Why on earth you think it's 'impossible' to stop a dingy is a mystery to me. This is exactly the sort of thing the Royal Marines and indeed elements of the army routinely train for, and trust me they wouldn't need 'machine guns', but what they would need is for weak politicians to grow a pair.

It beggars belief that some people think we should virtuously cling to legislation penned 70 years ago in the shadow of WW2, it's madness. People who pay traffickers to get them from the safe EU state of France to England are not refugees or asylum seekers, they're criminals and the insane things is, everyone knows that.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

SECTION 4. Article 33.

1. In a zone contiguous to its territorial sea, described as the contiguous zone, the coastal State may exercise the control necessary to:

(a) prevent infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations within its territory or territorial sea;

(b) punish infringement of the above laws and regulations committed within its territory or territorial sea.

2. The contiguous zone may not extend beyond 24 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured.


If Sunak suddenly found a pair of balls and decided to stop illegals entering UK territorial waters, international law would be on his side. If Macron refused to cooperate and ignored international law, which of course he would, that would be for the UN, EU and France to sort out. The illegal invasion could be stopped today. The reason it wont be is because of weak duplicitous politicians on both sides of the Channel.

Oh and btw, 'global warming' has been debunked, like all the other eco disasters that never happened, it was a myth. Which is why the climate industry came up with 'climate change'. Anything to keep the money rolling in.   

Habeas Corpus next please.
Bloody human rights get in the way of good strong governance.
If a country can't even unlawfully imprison it own citizens then sovereignty is meaningless.

BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

Essentially that's ^ waffle. If Sunak invoked international law he would not be "doing what the fuck he likes". The government, any government, can invoke international law and/or alter, amend or withdraw from any existing law/s. Laws are introduced altered amended and repealed all the time. In spite of what you obviously think, man made laws are not is set in stone. 

You mention "the rest of Europe's leaders", who exactly are you talking about? Europe is governed by a cabal of unelected commissioners who sit behind closed doors in Brussels, these people are are the architects of the almighty cock up that is mass European immigration. Are you aware the EU imposed immigration quotas on every EU state and threatened huge fines for any state who refused? Perhaps this is why the EU are turning a blind eye to hundreds of thousands of illegals who are fleeing the safe state of France for England. Which is why Sunak should, and with a sense of urgency, invoke UN law to stop the illegal invasion which is a clear threat to this country.

Now, you need to get your head out of your EU/minority appeasing arse so you are better able to see what the fuck is going on.