|
|
Post by jonksy on Aug 30, 2023 3:12:51 GMT
Labour backs Sunak's Brexit reform in shock move....
The Labour Party is supportive of the Prime Minister's reform of nutrient neutrality laws, GB News understands.
The Tory Government has found a perhaps surprising ally in its battle to strip away burdensome regulations on housebuilders that have been enforced in a quarter of council areas of England so far, as a result of an EUSSR ruling in 2018.
The rules, enforced by Natural England but originating from a Dutch case with the European Court of Justice, reinterpret the EUSSR Habitats Directive, 26 years after being written.
This is the same case that sparked the famous Dutch farmers' protests and a sharp democratic backlash on the continent.
A new populist political party was formed in the Netherlands in response to the rules which has been leading in recent polls.
In the UK, however, the way the EUSSR ruling was applied fell on housebuilders rather than farmers. This is due to the particularities of domestic courts, the environmental regulator, and UK planning system.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 30, 2023 7:58:23 GMT
Labour backs Sunak's Brexit reform in shock move....
The Labour Party is supportive of the Prime Minister's reform of nutrient neutrality laws, GB News understands.
The Tory Government has found a perhaps surprising ally in its battle to strip away burdensome regulations on housebuilders that have been enforced in a quarter of council areas of England so far, as a result of an EUSSR ruling in 2018.
The rules, enforced by Natural England but originating from a Dutch case with the European Court of Justice, reinterpret the EUSSR Habitats Directive, 26 years after being written.
This is the same case that sparked the famous Dutch farmers' protests and a sharp democratic backlash on the continent.
A new populist political party was formed in the Netherlands in response to the rules which has been leading in recent polls.
In the UK, however, the way the EUSSR ruling was applied fell on housebuilders rather than farmers. This is due to the particularities of domestic courts, the environmental regulator, and UK planning system.
Has anyone else put 2+2 together yet, Sunak wants to build 100,000 new homes, that just so happens that by the end of the year there will be roughly 100,000 'illegal migrants' waiting to be processed.....coincidence or what? .... LOL of course Labour will agree, they are hoping those 100,000 homes will be filled with boat people voting Labour. .... honestly they must think we are all fuckin stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Aug 30, 2023 8:06:13 GMT
Labour backs Sunak's Brexit reform in shock move....
The Labour Party is supportive of the Prime Minister's reform of nutrient neutrality laws, GB News understands.
The Tory Government has found a perhaps surprising ally in its battle to strip away burdensome regulations on housebuilders that have been enforced in a quarter of council areas of England so far, as a result of an EUSSR ruling in 2018.
The rules, enforced by Natural England but originating from a Dutch case with the European Court of Justice, reinterpret the EUSSR Habitats Directive, 26 years after being written.
This is the same case that sparked the famous Dutch farmers' protests and a sharp democratic backlash on the continent.
A new populist political party was formed in the Netherlands in response to the rules which has been leading in recent polls.
In the UK, however, the way the EUSSR ruling was applied fell on housebuilders rather than farmers. This is due to the particularities of domestic courts, the environmental regulator, and UK planning system.
Has anyone else put 2+2 together yet, Sunak wants to build 100,000 new homes, that just so happens that by the end of the year there will be roughly 100,000 'illegal migrants' waiting to be processed.....coincidence or what? .... LOL of course Labour will agree, they are hoping those 100,000 homes will be filled with boat people voting Labour. .... honestly they must think we are all fuckin stupid.
Whilst our own homeless mate have to languish in a shops doorway. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 30, 2023 8:17:54 GMT
Take it from me, those 100,000 homes are not intended for white British people, I know that, we know that, the Tories know that and Labour know that, and all built by waterways, .... hang about the boat people will turn them down ... they've told us they are 'frightened' of water after their perilous journey across the channel from France on the dinghies, that's why they 'Refuse' to go on the Bibby Stolkholm ............ LOL ... yeah if they are offered a house on these waterways developments their fear of water will miraculously disappear ... lololol
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 30, 2023 9:22:12 GMT
Interesting that you think all of our new houses are going to be occupied by the 10% of immigrants who are asylum seekers and not the 90% who are perfectly legal...
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 30, 2023 9:31:13 GMT
Interesting that you think all of our new houses are going to be occupied by the 10% of immigrants who are asylum seekers and not the 90% who are perfectly legal... You are still encouraging and facilitating a gigantic fraud on the UK public. I wonder why you do that... |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 30, 2023 9:31:39 GMT
Interesting that you think all of our new houses are going to be occupied by the 10% of immigrants who are asylum seekers and not the 90% who are perfectly legal... You still haven't worked out what 'illegal' is yet, have you?
The key is in the word 'illegal', illegal migrants do not = asylum seekers, they = illegal migrants.
One day he'll get it ... but don't hold your breath.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Aug 30, 2023 9:32:56 GMT
Interesting that you think all of our new houses are going to be occupied by the 10% of immigrants who are asylum seekers and not the 90% who are perfectly legal... Oh so you don't mind the UK being fucked over by your beloved EUSSR then? |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 30, 2023 11:38:16 GMT
Interesting that you think all of our new houses are going to be occupied by the 10% of immigrants who are asylum seekers and not the 90% who are perfectly legal... You still haven't worked out what 'illegal' is yet, have you?
The key is in the word 'illegal', illegal migrants do not = asylum seekers, they = illegal migrants.
One day he'll get it ... but don't hold your breath.
We can agree or disagree on what illegal is, but that is irrelevant to my point. My point is that 90% of those coming in have a visa and are entitled to live and work here, so on what basis are you attributing all additional housing to "illegals". It's your maths I am querying, not your dictionary definition. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 30, 2023 11:39:37 GMT
Interesting that you think all of our new houses are going to be occupied by the 10% of immigrants who are asylum seekers and not the 90% who are perfectly legal... Oh so you don't mind the UK being fucked over by your beloved EUSSR then? The EU is a third party so is treated like every one else now in our migration rules, so I'm unsure what point you are trying to make? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 30, 2023 11:54:56 GMT
You still haven't worked out what 'illegal' is yet, have you?
The key is in the word 'illegal', illegal migrants do not = asylum seekers, they = illegal migrants.
One day he'll get it ... but don't hold your breath.
We can agree or disagree on what illegal is, but that is irrelevant to my point. My point is that 90% of those coming in have a visa and are entitled to live and work here, so on what basis are you attributing all additional housing to "illegals". It's your maths I am querying, not your dictionary definition. Well ok I know how much you love your statistics, data, graphs and charts, by the end of the year there will be roughly 100,000 illegal/asylum seeker backlog waiting to be processed, once they are processed which I will guess Sunak will come up with another 'lightbulb' moment by fast tracking the 100,000 by granting them all a visa.
Now don't you think it's just more than a coincidence there will be 100,000 backlog for processing migrantss, while Sunak is talking about 100,000 extra new homes and even more suspicious Labour agreeing ... I don't think we need call on Sherlock Holmes for this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Aug 30, 2023 12:22:25 GMT
Oh so you don't mind the UK being fucked over by your beloved EUSSR then? The EU is a third party so is treated like every one else now in our migration rules, so I'm unsure what point you are trying to make? Even the dumbest in our society knows full well this is the EUSSR orchestrated revenge for loosing treasure Island. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 30, 2023 12:57:42 GMT
The EU is a third party so is treated like every one else now in our migration rules, so I'm unsure what point you are trying to make? Even the dumbest in our society knows full well this is the EUSSR orchestrated revenge for loosing treasure Island. Only the dumbest in society thinks that the EU determined our post Brexit immigration policy. You know the Australian style points system that you wanted? 🤔 |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Aug 30, 2023 13:01:45 GMT
Even the dumbest in our society knows full well this is the EUSSR orchestrated revenge for loosing treasure Island. Only the dumbest in society thinks that the EU determined our post Brexit immigration policy. You know the Australian style points system that you wanted? 🤔 They are ushering their received dross through EUSSR states to thrust upon the UK. Colour it how you like this is how the dictators of the EUSSR work and the UK must be punished at all costs because they chose to leave the EUSSR dictatorship. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Aug 30, 2023 13:13:43 GMT
We can agree or disagree on what illegal is, but that is irrelevant to my point. My point is that 90% of those coming in have a visa and are entitled to live and work here, so on what basis are you attributing all additional housing to "illegals". It's your maths I am querying, not your dictionary definition. Well ok I know how much you love your statistics, data, graphs and charts, by the end of the year there will be roughly 100,000 illegal/asylum seeker backlog waiting to be processed, once they are processed which I will guess Sunak will come up with another 'lightbulb' moment by fast tracking the 100,000 by granting them all a visa.
Now don't you think it's just more than a coincidence there will be 100,000 backlog for processing migrantss, while Sunak is talking about 100,000 extra new homes and even more suspicious Labour agreeing ... I don't think we need call on Sherlock Holmes for this one.
You are dealing with the eternally offended virtual signallers mate. As you know full well they support anything that is anti UK until it effects them and theirs. |
|
