Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2023 15:06:56 GMT
What are you talking about, they come across the channel. If Brains were made of dynamite you would not have enough to blow your cap off, you would struggle to have enough to singe your eyebrows Which bit of virtually all Rivers end up meeting the sea, the chain barriers as posted above are on two rivers that flow into two Ports, the chain stops the Taxi boats carrying Migrants getting to the Channel during the hours of darkness, it disrupts the smugglers Yup rivers. 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 12, 2023 16:53:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Aug 12, 2023 17:05:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Aug 12, 2023 17:15:50 GMT
Like all bad ideas this one came from the EU...
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 12, 2023 17:33:26 GMT
Out government has totally lot all sense of reality and humanity. The government looked into putting floating barriers in the English Channel to stop asylum seekers crossing to the UK, a leaked document shows. The Home Office approached the trade group Maritime UK over the possible use of temporary "marine fencing", in a request for ideas sent over the summer. This, it said, must be able to "prevent a slow-moving, heavily overloaded migrant boat from making progress". Totally illegal of course and nothing a good set of wire cutters couldn't handle. What next, drain the channel and make them walk? Dunno about floating barriers, but at least it shows the government are thinking along the right lines, at long last. And it's not illegal for any country with a sea border to stop people or vessels entering their territorial waters. This is the problem with you outraged lefties, you don't know anything. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2023 9:39:51 GMT
Out government has totally lot all sense of reality and humanity. The government looked into putting floating barriers in the English Channel to stop asylum seekers crossing to the UK, a leaked document shows. The Home Office approached the trade group Maritime UK over the possible use of temporary "marine fencing", in a request for ideas sent over the summer. This, it said, must be able to "prevent a slow-moving, heavily overloaded migrant boat from making progress". Totally illegal of course and nothing a good set of wire cutters couldn't handle. What next, drain the channel and make them walk? Dunno about floating barriers, but at least it shows the government are thinking along the right lines, at long last. And it's not illegal for any country with a sea border to stop people or vessels entering their territorial waters. This is the problem with you outraged lefties, you don't know anything. It is if it endangers life and obstructs traffic. Should we rename the Tories as JSOTories? |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 13, 2023 9:49:14 GMT
Dunno about floating barriers, but at least it shows the government are thinking along the right lines, at long last. And it's not illegal for any country with a sea border to stop people or vessels entering their territorial waters. This is the problem with you outraged lefties, you don't know anything. It is if it endangers life and obstructs traffic. Should we rename the Tories as JSOTories? You are talking emotional nonsense. The government could if they choose (And god only knows why they don't) lawfully stop anyone or any vessel entering British territorial waters. And the only people who are endangering life are: 1. People smugglers 2. Criminals who cross the channel 3. EU and French authorities who allow it to continue |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2023 11:34:42 GMT
It is if it endangers life and obstructs traffic. Should we rename the Tories as JSOTories? You are talking emotional nonsense. The government could if they choose (And god only knows why they don't) lawfully stop anyone or any vessel entering British territorial waters. And the only people who are endangering life are: 1. People smugglers 2. Criminals who cross the channel 3. EU and French authorities who allow it to continue 2. I notice you mention the criminals but not the asylum seekers. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 13, 2023 11:44:48 GMT
You are talking emotional nonsense. The government could if they choose (And god only knows why they don't) lawfully stop anyone or any vessel entering British territorial waters. And the only people who are endangering life are: 1. People smugglers 2. Criminals who cross the channel 3. EU and French authorities who allow it to continue 2. I notice you mention the criminals but not the asylum seekers. Oh for Christs sake, this like banging your head off a hard surface. If people pay criminals to get them from safe country 'A' to safe country 'B', then they are not refugees or asylum seekers. They are fuckin criminals. Dont you lefties understand that it's against the law for people to pay traffickers/smugglers to get them into a different country? And the only people who can stop criminals putting to sea are on the other side of the channel, in the EU and France. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Aug 13, 2023 11:45:08 GMT
You are talking emotional nonsense. The government could if they choose (And god only knows why they don't) lawfully stop anyone or any vessel entering British territorial waters. And the only people who are endangering life are: 1. People smugglers 2. Criminals who cross the channel 3. EU and French authorities who allow it to continue 2. I notice you mention the criminals but not the asylum seekers. So what else would you call them then FFS? |
|
