|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Jul 30, 2023 15:17:53 GMT
There is a catch in the title. I wonder if you can spot it. To have any clue what I'm on about you'll have to listen to this gentleman's story. He is a professional scientific researcher in the field of transgender. It's a good story.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jul 31, 2023 9:22:34 GMT
thats an hour and twenty one minutes long
Is there not a transcript or a summary somewhere ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2023 8:38:35 GMT
thats an hour and twenty one minutes long Is there not a transcript or a summary somewhere ? Why post in click bait mode. I won't watch it. I know the science, as does JoG.  |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Aug 1, 2023 10:17:58 GMT
I had five minutes spare waiting for a git submit to be approved In that time i used wikipedia to look up the person in question. It took me fifteen seconds to read the first couple of paragraphs of the entry, which i believe covers succinctly the issue the baron thinks requires you to spend about an hour and a half listening to a video to grasp. It took three minutes to screen grab that in case some woke shithead trashes it, save it to an external image cloud drive and post this Enjoy  |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 1, 2023 10:23:10 GMT
'inappropriate science'
We haven't seen that notion around much since the middle ages.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Aug 6, 2023 11:39:15 GMT
I had five minutes spare waiting for a git submit to be approved In that time i used wikipedia to look up the person in question. It took me fifteen seconds to read the first couple of paragraphs of the entry, which i believe covers succinctly the issue the baron thinks requires you to spend about an hour and a half listening to a video to grasp. It took three minutes to screen grab that in case some woke shithead trashes it, save it to an external image cloud drive and post this Enjoy But you did not understand what his findings were. There are important aspects you leave out, namely what the proof is. Your findings in the wiki are only the reaction to his findings. I posted that which they are trying to censor. If you listen and follow the experimental procedure you can review his work properly first-hand. Not Chinese whispers, which I'm sure you get a lot of, what with working for one! |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Aug 6, 2023 20:56:38 GMT
I had five minutes spare waiting for a git submit to be approved In that time i used wikipedia to look up the person in question. It took me fifteen seconds to read the first couple of paragraphs of the entry, which i believe covers succinctly the issue the baron thinks requires you to spend about an hour and a half listening to a video to grasp. It took three minutes to screen grab that in case some woke shithead trashes it, save it to an external image cloud drive and post this Enjoy But you did not understand what his findings were. There are important aspects you leave out, namely what the proof is. Your findings in the wiki are only the reaction to his findings. I posted that which they are trying to censor. If you listen and follow the experimental procedure you can review his work properly first-hand. Not Chinese whispers, which I'm sure you get a lot of, what with working for one! The thing is, it really does not matter what the specifics are. The ‘of course its a woman even if it still has a dick’ / ‘of course men can have periods’ camp wont listen to scientific reason. End of. That’s as much as any scientist needs to know about this. And if i really wanted to find the details i would explore my old pubmed login or my research library account and read his work, now i know who he is. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Aug 6, 2023 21:08:52 GMT
But you did not understand what his findings were. There are important aspects you leave out, namely what the proof is. Your findings in the wiki are only the reaction to his findings. I posted that which they are trying to censor. If you listen and follow the experimental procedure you can review his work properly first-hand. Not Chinese whispers, which I'm sure you get a lot of, what with working for one! The thing is, it really does not matter what the specifics are. The ‘of course its a woman even if it still has a dick’ / ‘of course men can have periods’ camp wont listen to scientific reason. End of. That’s as much as any scientist needs to know about this. And if i really wanted to find the details i would explore my old pubmed login or my research library account and read his work, now i know who he is. Your reply is proof you don't know what I'm on about.
This should make it clear.
Lets start with the observation that there are many people who claim to be transgender. This is an observable. Now as a scientist of enquiring mind, one would want to know why. What he offers is scientific proof that shows why we observe what we do. He ran his experiments to conform with the best practice of experimental science in the field since he works in that field, hence can not be dismissed regarding experimental procedure, unintended bias and so on. In a word he nails it. What you have done here is assumed you know the result which in turn stopped you from looking further. This man is a professor. These types are trained to look further. His inquisitiveness sure paid off, but what can they do. Well as you link says, they went for brute force and ignorance. Kind a looks like desperation to me. It seems to suggest his study is interesting. This is why I posted it. You don't have to watch the whole thing. The first 15m is a good enough summary of the meat of the findings.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Aug 6, 2023 21:29:27 GMT
I think you misunderstand.
I have the same training in preparing material for publication. I imagine he has, as you say, nailed it. But his opponents wont have it.
I think i understand the problem far better than many. I’ve been firebombed for my investigations into cancer and the mechanisms by which nasty things breach the cell membrane. People who didn't like the way i went about finding answers put incendiary devices under the fuel tank if my car, my boss’s car and his boss’s car. The big boss left earlier than us and as he drove down the 15% gradient on Park Row a device used by the IRA to blow Airey Neave’s legs off as he drove up the incline from the houses of parliament car park blew a hole in his suzuki SJ jeep.
Luckily it was one of those open cabin things and he vaulted over the bonnet.
I see no difference between those seeking to prevent this man making the truth he has found known through censorship and those seeking to prevent me and my fellow scientists with deadly force.
The aims are the same and they both feel the ends justify the means.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Aug 6, 2023 23:45:52 GMT
I think you misunderstand. I have the same training in preparing material for publication. I imagine he has, as you say, nailed it. But his opponents wont have it. I think i understand the problem far better than many. I’ve been firebombed for my investigations into cancer and the mechanisms by which nasty things breach the cell membrane. People who didn't like the way i went about finding answers put incendiary devices under the fuel tank if my car, my boss’s car and his boss’s car. The big boss left earlier than us and as he drove down the 15% gradient on Park Row a device used by the IRA to blow Airey Neave’s legs off as he drove up the incline from the houses of parliament car park blew a hole in his suzuki SJ jeep. Luckily it was one of those open cabin things and he vaulted over the bonnet. I see no difference between those seeking to prevent this man making the truth he has found known through censorship and those seeking to prevent me and my fellow scientists with deadly force. The aims are the same and they both feel the ends justify the means. He tells us he has orders of magnitude more transmission of his findings to the wider community than he could have ever hoped for had they not tried to shut him up. Anyway I thought it was Ireland you needed to check under our car before going for a drive. |
|
