|
|
Post by Vinny on Oct 28, 2022 9:06:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Equivocal on Oct 28, 2022 11:27:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Dec 2, 2022 19:27:53 GMT
It is a wise child that knows his own father - One can never be sure of paternity. The ancient Greeks knew it — and the populations of post WW one and WWII Britain were aware of it too. Plus the aristocracy, were often able to indulge and their illegitimate offspring were mostly accepted… |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jan 5, 2023 12:51:46 GMT
Have any sold ??
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 5, 2023 18:30:12 GMT
It's the No 1 best seller on Amazon.. a bargain at £14
|
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Jan 5, 2023 18:44:32 GMT
Diana didn't even meet Hewett until after Harry was born. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Jan 5, 2023 21:16:05 GMT
Book release is next week.
|
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Jan 6, 2023 9:15:22 GMT
I think it would make a far more interesting book to explore who is exploiting who, Harry or the British press.
And in the end, how much money each one made for the whole sorry mess.
I also think the "inadvertent release in Spain" is a careful set up to allow the press to explore the more juicy parts as free advertising ahead of announced release next week.
I used to have some sympathy with Harry and Megan but this kind of commercialisation of very personal family issues doesn't sit well with me. The other side can't answer back without a huge slanging match that will damage the Monarchy and Harry is screaming and stamping his feet for millions of dollars. I am fed up with his constant need to explain himself. What is his purpose? If he just said he wants to get rid of the monarchy there would be more meat on the bone.
I hope no one buys the wretched thing and the press ignores it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Jan 6, 2023 9:26:24 GMT
I think it would make a far more interesting book to explore who is exploiting who, Harry or the British press. And in the end, how much money each one made for the whole sorry mess. I also think the "inadvertent release in Spain" is a careful set up to allow the press to explore the more juicy parts as free advertising ahead of announced release next week. I used to have some sympathy with Harry and Megan but this kind of commercialisation of very personal family issues doesn't sit well with me. The other side can't answer back without a huge slanging match that will damage the Monarchy and Harry is screaming and stamping his feet for millions of dollars. I am fed up with his constant need to explain himself. What is his purpose? If he just said he wants to get rid of the monarchy there would be more meat on the bone. I hope no one buys the wretched thing and the press ignores it. Yes, I'm losing sympathy for him now as well. I don't have a problem with him being able to tell his side of the story to counter the misinformation from the tabloids but cynically milking it for cash is a step too far. |
|
|
|
Post by Paulus de B on Jan 6, 2023 12:41:56 GMT
It is a wise child that knows his own father - One can never be sure of paternity. The ancient Greeks knew it — and the populations of post WW one and WWII Britain were aware of it too. Plus the aristocracy, were often able to indulge and their illegitimate offspring were mostly accepted… One can be as sure of paternity as makes no difference. Given the money to be made by the media from proving a prince to be illegitimate, how likely is it that no one has ever obtained a DNA sample from him? If he were actually illegitimate, we would surely know it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_paternity_testing |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2023 15:15:08 GMT
One can be as sure of paternity as makes no difference. Given the money to be made by the media from proving a prince to be illegitimate, how likely is it that no one has ever obtained a DNA sample from him? If he were actually illegitimate, we would surely know it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_paternity_testingAgreed. The photos of Harry and James Hewitt are simply mischief making. I hope the book flops. If all the revelations on the news are the highlights, I wouldn't want to read the rest of it. How tedious are other family's squabbles? |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Jan 6, 2023 16:12:40 GMT
One can be as sure of paternity as makes no difference. Given the money to be made by the media from proving a prince to be illegitimate, how likely is it that no one has ever obtained a DNA sample from him? If he were actually illegitimate, we would surely know it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_paternity_testingAgreed. The photos of Harry and James Hewitt are simply mischief making. I hope the book flops. If all the revelations on the news are the highlights, I wouldn't want to read the rest of it. How tedious are other family's squabbles? Not only that, I'm pretty sure the palace would have leaked that Harry was illegitimate during Charles and Diana's divorce. The public mostly blamed Charles for his infidelity so if they could have proved Diana was playing away too they would have. Plenty of gingers in the Spencer-Churchill family line for Harry to have got his hair colour from. |
|
|
|
Post by jeg er on Jan 6, 2023 16:59:13 GMT
metro.co.uk/2022/10/27/prince-harry-reveals-name-and-cover-of-upcoming-bombshell-memoir-17648562/So apparently he's releasing an explosive memoir called "spare". "Explosive", like his real dad not actually being Charles ? If that's the case, I think most of us already realise it.  ![]() photo is misleading. several differences between the two of them. harry's chin is a different shape and sticks out more, noses are different shape and angle, ears are completely different, harry's forehead is not as wide as hewitt's. there is just a generic similarity, as one would find among pairs of people with some alikeness |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Jan 6, 2023 17:48:39 GMT
metro.co.uk/2022/10/27/prince-harry-reveals-name-and-cover-of-upcoming-bombshell-memoir-17648562/So apparently he's releasing an explosive memoir called "spare". "Explosive", like his real dad not actually being Charles ? If that's the case, I think most of us already realise it. ![]() photo is misleading. several differences between the two of them. harry's chin is a different shape and sticks out more, noses are different shape and angle, ears are completely different, harry's forehead is not as wide as hewitt's. there is just a generic similarity, as one would find among pairs of people with some alikeness Yup, they probably searched through dozens of images to find two that looked vaguely similar. |
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on Jan 6, 2023 19:16:16 GMT
I don't think this will end well for Harry, he is damaging or at least threatening to damage the UK monarchy. Now he has attacked the UK military or at least upset them: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64185176 |
|
