|
|
Post by jonksy on Jul 3, 2023 14:03:36 GMT
Let Boris chair an investigation into Starmer's part in this.......How can anyone believe Smtarmer when he says no rules were broken when he himself told lies during Beergate when he said Angela Rayner was not present and she was and that only 6 people were present and there were clearly in excess of 20. If Sue Gray had nothing to hide why did she not cooperate with the Cabinet Office enquiry? She has clearly broken the code and should be banned from working for the Civil Service for more than 6 months preferably a year. Smarmer will then be in dire straits as his Shadow Cabinet has no government experience except for Yvette Cooper and and Ed Milliband.
Cabinet Office finds Partygate report author Sue Gray 'broke civil service rules' by not revealing talks with Keir Starmer before quitting Whitehall to become Labour leader's chief of staff Cabinet Office finds the civil service code was 'prima facie broken' by Ms Gray Partygate report author Sue Gray has been found by the Cabinet Office to have broken civil service rules for not revealing her contact with Labour's Smarmer.
The ex-senior civil servant caused a huge political row earlier this year when it was revealed she had been in talks about becoming Smarmers chief of staff.
Ms Gray, who authored the Partygate report into Covid rule-breaking in Downing Street, was last week cleared by a watchdog to take up the Labour role in September.
But the Cabinet Office today found the civil service code was 'prima facie broken' by Ms Gray not declaring her discussions with Smarmer to her Whitehall bosses or ministers.
Ms Gray was first approached by Smarmer in late October last year but she did not resign her civil service role until 2 March, when news of her job offer from the Labour leader was publicly revealed.
She refused to cooperate with a subsequent Cabinet Office investigation into the circumstances of her departure from Whitehall.
 Sue Gray caused a huge political row earlier this year when it was revealed
she had been in talks about becoming Sir Keir Starmer's chief of staff
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2023 14:11:57 GMT
How can the cabinet office 'investigation' find Sue Gray 'guilty' if she did not cooperate with them?
Sue Gray went through the proper channels and was found to have broken no rules and was cleared to work with Starmer.
The article you are citing says as much and even the cabinet office have said it is only on 'first impressions' that she is 'guilty.
You really need to read the articles that you use instead of just jumping at the headlines.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2023 16:38:21 GMT
How can the cabinet office 'investigation' find Sue Gray 'guilty' if she did not cooperate with them? Sue Gray went through the proper channels and was found to have broken no rules and was cleared to work with Starmer. The article you are citing says as much and even the cabinet office have said it is only on 'first impressions' that she is 'guilty. You really need to read the articles that you use instead of just jumping at the headlines. How come a terrible stench can be smelt here in Devon when you post on this forum wonky? And no it has nothing to do with Torbay on turd... How can the cabinet office 'investigation' find Sue Gray 'guilty' if she did not cooperate with them? Sue Gray went through the proper channels and was found to have broken no rules and was cleared to work with Starmer. The article you are citing says as much and even the cabinet office have said it is only on 'first impressions' that she is 'guilty. You really need to read the articles that you use instead of just jumping at the headlines. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jul 3, 2023 16:44:17 GMT
Well, she is perfect for the job, a two-faced piece of crap who could lie her way to an Oscar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 3, 2023 16:47:35 GMT
Well, she is perfect for the job, a two-faced piece of crap who could lie her way to an Oscar. Yes, she always looks like a very very worried woman, and so she should be, once it all comes out that her and Starmer colluded to bring down Johnson she will also face a criminal investigation, it's a very very serious offense to 'accept' a bribe, she will be looking at prison, no wonder she looks like a worried woman. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jul 3, 2023 16:51:21 GMT
Well, she is perfect for the job, a two-faced piece of crap who could lie her way to an Oscar. Yes, she always looks like a very very worried woman, and so she should be, once it all comes out that her and Starmer colluded to bring down Johnson she will also face a criminal investigation, it's a very very serious offense to 'accept' a bribe, she will be looking at prison, no wonder she looks like a worried woman. I couldn't careless, she is what she is, being protected because of her political worth, not for any other reason. She is still a piece of crap. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2023 16:52:08 GMT
Well, she is perfect for the job, a two-faced piece of crap who could lie her way to an Oscar. 🤣 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2023 16:52:24 GMT
Well, she is perfect for the job, a two-faced piece of crap who could lie her way to an Oscar. Yes, she always looks like a very very worried woman, and so she should be, once it all comes out that her and Starmer colluded to bring down Johnson she will also face a criminal investigation, it's a very very serious offense to 'accept' a bribe, she will be looking at prison, no wonder she looks like a worried woman. 🤣😂 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2023 16:52:50 GMT
Yes, she always looks like a very very worried woman, and so she should be, once it all comes out that her and Starmer colluded to bring down Johnson she will also face a criminal investigation, it's a very very serious offense to 'accept' a bribe, she will be looking at prison, no wonder she looks like a worried woman. I couldn't careless, she is what she is, being protected because of her political worth, not for any other reason. She is still a piece of crap. Do you know her? |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jul 3, 2023 16:57:31 GMT
I couldn't careless, she is what she is, being protected because of her political worth, not for any other reason. She is still a piece of crap. Do you know her? Her reputation precedes her. Crack on then stand up for a piece of crap, it says more than you will ever know. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jul 3, 2023 17:10:55 GMT
How can the cabinet office 'investigation' find Sue Gray 'guilty' if she did not cooperate with them? Happens every day in courts up and down the land.. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 3, 2023 17:21:22 GMT
How can the cabinet office 'investigation' find Sue Gray 'guilty'... Probably because she didn't cooperate with them, Wonky. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 3, 2023 17:46:30 GMT
How come a terrible stench can be smelt here in Devon when you post on this forum wonky? And no it has nothing to do with Torbay on turd... How can the cabinet office 'investigation' find Sue Gray 'guilty' if she did not cooperate with them? Sue Gray went through the proper channels and was found to have broken no rules and was cleared to work with Starmer. The article you are citing says as much and even the cabinet office have said it is only on 'first impressions' that she is 'guilty. You really need to read the articles that you use instead of just jumping at the headlines. Former official Sue Gray broke civil service rules after failing to declare contact with Labour over a job offer, a Cabinet Office inquiry has found. Ms Gray, who led a probe into lockdown parties in Downing Street, was cleared to work for Labour by Parliament's appointments adviser last week. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2023 21:07:49 GMT
jonksy ... "Starmer's part in this.......How can anyone believe Smtarmer when he says no rules were broken when he himself told lies during Beergate when he said Angela Rayner was not present"
Keir Starmer never said that Angela Raynor was not there, which makes your entire post a lie, and totally pointless.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jul 3, 2023 22:38:31 GMT
jonksy ... "Starmer's part in this.......How can anyone believe Smtarmer when he says no rules were broken when he himself told lies during Beergate when he said Angela Rayner was not present"Keir Starmer never said that Angela Raynor was not there, which makes your entire post a lie, and totally pointless. He was so fucking pissed it seems he couldn't remember who was there fiddles or how many attended. How the fuck could he not of known that loud mouthed slapper wasn't there? her big gob would have given her away. |
|
