Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2023 7:30:25 GMT
A "Cabinet Office Inquiry" is simply another name for a "Conservative Party Inquiry", about as impartial as a Turkey voting for Christmas.
Though I admitt it does sound rather official
|
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jul 4, 2023 7:35:00 GMT
A "Cabinet Office Inquiry" is simply another name for a "Conservative Party Inquiry", about as impartial as a Turkey voting for Christmas. Though I admitt it does sound rather official What advantage does it give you at Liebour HQ to support such a piece of crap? when she has put her cards on the table that she is not only a known liar but also would stab anyone in the back to feather her own nest? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2023 8:15:58 GMT
A "Cabinet Office Inquiry" is simply another name for a "Conservative Party Inquiry", about as impartial as a Turkey voting for Christmas. Though I admitt it does sound rather official What advantage does it give you at Liebour HQ to support such a piece of crap? when she has put her cards on the table that she is not only a known liar but also would stab anyone in the back to feather her own nest? Who did she stab in the back? |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jul 4, 2023 8:19:26 GMT
What advantage does it give you at Liebour HQ to support such a piece of crap? when she has put her cards on the table that she is not only a known liar but also would stab anyone in the back to feather her own nest? Who did she stab in the back? Everyone she ever came across according to Whitehall, I would hazard a guess they should know. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Jul 4, 2023 8:30:08 GMT
A "Cabinet Office Inquiry" is simply another name for a "Conservative Party Inquiry", about as impartial as a Turkey voting for Christmas. Though I admitt it does sound rather official Until all enquiries are undertaken by bodies truly independent of the Westminster bubble and certainly not by place men from that bubble you’ll never get anything near to fair or balanced. Self regulation is the joke that it is and the ongoing misuse of expense,the honours? system is testament to that. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Jul 4, 2023 8:31:17 GMT
...and just like that, conservatives care about rules again. So long as it isn't Boris unlawfully proroguing parliament or having parties during lockdown. Did he, I thought it was found guilty after the event |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Jul 4, 2023 9:32:56 GMT
...and just like that, conservatives care about rules again. So long as it isn't Boris unlawfully proroguing parliament or having parties during lockdown. Did he, I thought it was found guilty after the event He couldn't be found guilty before the event. That's not how time works. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2023 9:40:20 GMT
Corruption, sleaze, corporate fascism, these are the methods Labour meant as no holds barred. I have to admit, I didn't expect them to go full blown like this, but at least we know Labour is the most fascist, repulsive and anti-democratic movement in the country that relies on total corruption to screw the people.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Jul 4, 2023 9:47:39 GMT
Did he, I thought it was found guilty after the event He couldn't be found guilty before the event. That's not how time works. Exactly, which only shows he was innocent until proven guilty. Ask you glove puppet. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2023 9:51:00 GMT
Who did she stab in the back? Everyone she ever came across according to Whitehall, I would hazard a guess they should know. So, making it up then? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2023 9:52:04 GMT
Corruption, sleaze, corporate fascism, these are the methods Labour meant as no holds barred. I have to admit, I didn't expect them to go full blown like this, but at least we know Labour is the most fascist, repulsive and anti-democratic movement in the country that relies on total corruption to screw the people. How do you know that? |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Jul 4, 2023 9:52:45 GMT
Did he, I thought it was found guilty after the event He couldn't be found guilty before the event. That's not how time works. Harperson begs to differ. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jul 4, 2023 11:07:08 GMT
She broke the Civil Service code by failing to disclose her contacts with the Labour Party - the only difference of opinion with ACOBA was the length of time she has to wait before joining the Labour Party. The government wanted 12 months - ACOBA decided on 6. She disclosed them to the relevant authorities, not the irrelevant ones. Did you answer any of the questions? No she did not |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2023 11:55:06 GMT
She disclosed them to the relevant authorities, not the irrelevant ones. Did you answer any of the questions? No she did not She did not talk to ACOBA then, that is the authority that deals with civil servants changing jobs, not the Tory cabinet office looking to score political points. Or do you think it should have just been the cabinet office that looked into it? |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 4, 2023 11:58:03 GMT
Did he, I thought it was found guilty after the event He couldn't be found guilty before the event. That's not how time works. It is for Harriet Harperson. |
|
