|
|
Post by thomas on Jul 30, 2023 17:12:13 GMT
Mod Notice
Give it a rest with the back and forth over Scottish Independence and stick to the subject of the thread. apologies pacifico. you will see darling brought the scottish indy subject into the thread on page 121 , 12 posts down when he took offence to my correction of somethig he said in error. My last word on the matter , im happy to get back to the topic at hand , and potentially we could move these posts over to the scottish threads of the mods dont mind?
|
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 30, 2023 17:14:22 GMT
Mod Notice
Give it a rest with the back and forth over Scottish Independence and stick to the subject of the thread. apologies pacifico. you will see darling brought the scottish indy subject into the thread on page 121 , 12 posts down when he took offence to my correction of somethig he said in error. My last word on the matter , im happy to get back to the topic at hand , and potentially we could move these posts over to the scottish threads of the mods dont mind?
Hear! Hear! Toejam. Let's get back to the manfrog. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jul 30, 2023 17:17:28 GMT
are you an zany part of the new labour 24 % darling?
A YouGov opinion poll last week revealed 24 percent of Labour voters think banks should be allowed to remove customers who have personal or political beliefs that don’t align with their values.
Labour leader Keir Starmer did eventually mutter something about how no one should be refused banking services because of their views, but it had to be dragged out of him.
Think how different the reaction would have been if it had been Jeremy Corbyn who’d been de-banked and not Nigel Farage, particularly if the lender then leaked confidential details of his finances to the BBC in an effort to pretend the reason he’d lost his account was for purely “commercial reasons”.
The entire Liberal Establishment would have been up in arms, demanding the head of the bank’s CEO.
The same people who’ve been sniggering at Nigel’s misfortune would have been loudly proclaiming that having a bank account is a basic human right, like access to water and electricity.
24% is quite high. I would have thought you'd have to be a raving lunatic or given a lot of brown envelopes to support such a thing. The level of extreme unethical arguments they depend on really does highlight the problem when these people organise and corrupt authority. i thought 24 % was a fairly high number too , but what do you expect by a bunch of people whose leadership , and much of the membership , supported other anti democratic actions like overturning the 2016 brexit ref , or for exmaple when labour robin cook devised the infamous 40 % rule in a referendum in scotland?
The same people now across numerous forums over the last 7 years have been having melt downs about democracy and wanting to through the baby out with the bathwater. debanking farage is merely the latest manifestation of that anti democratic tendency.
i am shocked at some of the arguments on display by people who claim to call themselves socialist , or at least social democrats.
...but then , we remember similar behaviour back in 2010 over nick griffin and the loony left or blairite centrists demanding he be de platformed . Anti democracy is in their genes it appears.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jul 30, 2023 17:18:08 GMT
are you an zany part of the new labour 24 % darling?
A YouGov opinion poll last week revealed 24 percent of Labour voters think banks should be allowed to remove customers who have personal or political beliefs that don’t align with their values.
Labour leader Keir Starmer did eventually mutter something about how no one should be refused banking services because of their views, but it had to be dragged out of him.
Think how different the reaction would have been if it had been Jeremy Corbyn who’d been de-banked and not Nigel Farage, particularly if the lender then leaked confidential details of his finances to the BBC in an effort to pretend the reason he’d lost his account was for purely “commercial reasons”.
The entire Liberal Establishment would have been up in arms, demanding the head of the bank’s CEO.
The same people who’ve been sniggering at Nigel’s misfortune would have been loudly proclaiming that having a bank account is a basic human right, like access to water and electricity.
24% is quite high. I would have thought you'd have to be a raving lunatic or given a lot of brown envelopes to support such a thing. Well these are Labour supporters we are talking about...  |
|
|
|
Post by borchester on Jul 30, 2023 17:18:45 GMT
Mod Notice
Give it a rest with the back and forth over Scottish Independence and stick to the subject of the thread. apologies pacifico. you will see darling brought the scottish indy subject into the thread on page 121 , 12 posts down when he took offence to my correction of somethig he said in error. My last word on the matter , im happy to get back to the topic at hand , and potentially we could move these posts over to the scottish threads of the mods dont mind?
Remember when we were invited over from Pol-tics.com on the promise that this was going to be a fresh, exciting board where everyone would be free to speak their mind ?
Pacifico doesn't
|
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Jul 30, 2023 17:20:01 GMT
i am doing something every time a vote is cast , i make sure i vote against labour. you meanwhile sit on politics forums like this bleating about men not being allowed to become women , or how unfair the world is when no one agrees with you over farages debanking , or how nasty priti patel let the migrants drown in the channel that sort of thing.
Its fun watching the unravelling of your lame puerile arguments , your melt downs , and reduction down to name calling like "toe jam" . I mean is that supposed to be funny or even an insult?
Ireland just returned my call. They say they fought for their independence more than 100 years ago and that they wanted to confirm that they think you're a bunch of skirt-wearing cowards. Too far darling. Don't let the skirts fool you, you can never accuse the Scotch of backing away from a fight. They have a fine reputation in the British army and around the world. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 30, 2023 17:20:47 GMT
24% is quite high. I would have thought you'd have to be a raving lunatic or given a lot of brown envelopes to support such a thing. The level of extreme unethical arguments they depend on really does highlight the problem when these people organise and corrupt authority. i thought 24 % was a fairly high number too , but what do you expect by a bunch of people whose leadership , and much of the membership , supported other anti democratic actions like overturning the 2016 brexit ref , or for exmaple when labour robin cook devised the infamous 40 % rule in a referendum in scotland?
The same people now across numerous forums over the last 7 years have been having melt downs about democracy and wanting to through the baby out with the bathwater. debanking farage is merely the latest manifestation of that anti democratic tendency.
i am shocked at some of the arguments on display by people who claim to call themselves socialist , or at least social democrats.
...but then , we remember similar behaviour back in 2010 over nick griffin and the loony left or blairite centrists demanding he be de platformed . Anti democracy is in their genes it appears.
How was the law allowing Banks to disassociate from persons liable to cause reputational damage introduced, Toejam? Was it by regulation or directive? Either way, it was sourced in Parliament. You know, the democratically elected parliament in Westminster. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 30, 2023 17:21:48 GMT
Ireland just returned my call. They say they fought for their independence more than 100 years ago and that they wanted to confirm that they think you're a bunch of skirt-wearing cowards. Too far darling. Don't let the skirts fool you, you can never accuse the Scotch of backing away from a fight. They have a fine reputation in the British army and around the world. If Doc hadn't forbidden it, I'd say they were the unionist element. The nationalist element appear to be a bunch of pussies. Message to Doc: I'm replying to a mod here, so not going out of my way to ignore your instructions. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jul 30, 2023 17:24:02 GMT
apologies pacifico. you will see darling brought the scottish indy subject into the thread on page 121 , 12 posts down when he took offence to my correction of somethig he said in error. My last word on the matter , im happy to get back to the topic at hand , and potentially we could move these posts over to the scottish threads of the mods dont mind?
Remember when we were invited over from Pol-tics.com on the promise that this was going to be a fresh, exciting board where everyone would be free to speak their mind ?
Pacifico doesn't
unfair borkie. Pacifico has a point , and the mods here have been nothing more than extremely fair , while letting the boards flow within the rules. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jul 30, 2023 17:30:23 GMT
i thought 24 % was a fairly high number too , but what do you expect by a bunch of people whose leadership , and much of the membership , supported other anti democratic actions like overturning the 2016 brexit ref , or for exmaple when labour robin cook devised the infamous 40 % rule in a referendum in scotland?
The same people now across numerous forums over the last 7 years have been having melt downs about democracy and wanting to through the baby out with the bathwater. debanking farage is merely the latest manifestation of that anti democratic tendency.
i am shocked at some of the arguments on display by people who claim to call themselves socialist , or at least social democrats.
...but then , we remember similar behaviour back in 2010 over nick griffin and the loony left or blairite centrists demanding he be de platformed . Anti democracy is in their genes it appears.
How was the law allowing Banks to disassociate from persons liable to cause reputational damage introduced, Toejam? Was it by regulation or directive? Either way, it was sourced in Parliament. You know, the democratically elected parliament in Westminster. i would say in between cryptic comments , attempts at insults , poor humour coupled with a distinct ignorance on just about every topic , eventually you might get a point across that may very well be coherent enough to reply to.
All these pages into this thread , on this forum , not to mention the bad pr off it , and still we can all see how much it rankles farage has come out smelling of roses once more , and looking the martyr becasue some dim wit liberal cant get over brexit and tried to cancel him.
With enemies like you darling , who needs friends?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 30, 2023 17:30:47 GMT
i thought 24 % was a fairly high number too , but what do you expect by a bunch of people whose leadership , and much of the membership , supported other anti democratic actions like overturning the 2016 brexit ref , or for exmaple when labour robin cook devised the infamous 40 % rule in a referendum in scotland?
The same people now across numerous forums over the last 7 years have been having melt downs about democracy and wanting to through the baby out with the bathwater. debanking farage is merely the latest manifestation of that anti democratic tendency.
i am shocked at some of the arguments on display by people who claim to call themselves socialist , or at least social democrats.
...but then , we remember similar behaviour back in 2010 over nick griffin and the loony left or blairite centrists demanding he be de platformed . Anti democracy is in their genes it appears.
How was the law allowing Banks to disassociate from persons liable to cause reputational damage introduced, Toejam? Was it by regulation or directive? Either way, it was sourced in Parliament. You know, the democratically elected parliament in Westminster. We are slowly but surely being conditioned into a lefty society, it's in your face everywhere, all walks of life including the banks, Civil Service, NHS, schools, tv, advertising, you name it and it's going Woke, this government are sitting back and doing nothing, I suspect because they can't, it's deep rooted, and it's a cross party cahoots. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 30, 2023 17:31:36 GMT
How was the law allowing Banks to disassociate from persons liable to cause reputational damage introduced, Toejam? Was it by regulation or directive? Either way, it was sourced in Parliament. You know, the democratically elected parliament in Westminster. i would say in between cryptic comments , attempts at insults , poor humour coupled with a distinct ignorance on just about every topic , eventually you might get a point across that may very well be coherent enough to reply to.
All these pages into this thread , on this forum , not to mention the bad pr off it , and still we can all see how much it rankles farage has come out smelling of roses once more , and looking the martyr becasue some dim wit liberal cant get over brexit and tried to cancel him.
With enemies like you darling , who needs friends?
What about butt-sore and bitter tears? |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 30, 2023 17:32:53 GMT
I'm sure to thrive under your tutelage, Toejam. Keep the 'likes' coming. They sustain me. Unless I get a like for ''Gaelic bread'' I'm going home and I'm taking my bat and ball with me. I've got a shedload of likes from Toejam I'm not using. Fill your boots. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jul 30, 2023 17:34:31 GMT
How was the law allowing Banks to disassociate from persons liable to cause reputational damage introduced, Toejam? Was it by regulation or directive? Either way, it was sourced in Parliament. You know, the democratically elected parliament in Westminster. We are slowly but surely being conditioned into a lefty society, it's in your face everywhere, all walks of life including the banks, Civil Service, NHS, schools, tv, advertising, you name it and it's going Woke, this government are sitting back and doing nothing, I suspect because they can't, it's deep rooted, and it's a cross party cahoots. dont know if you have seen this fairsociety....
BANK ON IT Law could be changed so Brits have a legal right to a bank account, under plan championed by David Davis
THE LAW could be changed to prevent Brits being de-banked under proposals pushed by Tory big beast David Davis.
The ex Cabinet minister said it is a travesty that Nigel Farage and others have been blacklisted by banks for their political views.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jul 30, 2023 17:35:58 GMT
i would say in between cryptic comments , attempts at insults , poor humour coupled with a distinct ignorance on just about every topic , eventually you might get a point across that may very well be coherent enough to reply to.
All these pages into this thread , on this forum , not to mention the bad pr off it , and still we can all see how much it rankles farage has come out smelling of roses once more , and looking the martyr becasue some dim wit liberal cant get over brexit and tried to cancel him.
With enemies like you darling , who needs friends?
What about butt-sore and bitter tears? i have tried to engage with you , but your trolling knows no bounds , so there you go. Obviously farage winning once more has pushed you over the edge beyond any form of debate.
|
|
