|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 19, 2023 5:05:44 GMT
That's not actually what I wrote. I said they are ignoring his frailty and failing mental facilities, and then gave an example of his latest gaffe.That's the wrong whistleblower btw. An FBI whistleblower gave details of a 1023 (intelligence document) that he claimed the FBI had sat on / failed to investigate properly. The FBI director refused to confirm its existence, until a member of the Oversight Committee said he had seen a copy of the 1023 and a subpoena was issued for the original. The FBI director refused to hand it over giving the old line "we don't discuss what we are / are not investigating". He was threathened with contempt proceeding and then gave over a heavily redacted version... ie they redacted out the fact that the source claimed to have 17 voice recordings of the Bidens. It might all be bullshit, but flip it around, and how would the MSM be reporting these events if they were about Trump? This is the same MSM that fraudulently labelled the Laptop Story as Russian disinformation during the last Presidential Election... Fair comment,as to the rest as I said that this is the best the US can come up with as leaders is worrying given their power. These witch hunts come with consequences for the loony left....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2023 6:00:18 GMT
Likening Johnson and Trump is classic.🤣
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jun 19, 2023 6:40:32 GMT
That's not actually what I wrote. I said they are ignoring his frailty and failing mental facilities, and then gave an example of his latest gaffe.That's the wrong whistleblower btw. An FBI whistleblower gave details of a 1023 (intelligence document) that he claimed the FBI had sat on / failed to investigate properly. The FBI director refused to confirm its existence, until a member of the Oversight Committee said he had seen a copy of the 1023 and a subpoena was issued for the original. The FBI director refused to hand it over giving the old line "we don't discuss what we are / are not investigating". He was threathened with contempt proceeding and then gave over a heavily redacted version... ie they redacted out the fact that the source claimed to have 17 voice recordings of the Bidens. It might all be bullshit, but flip it around, and how would the MSM be reporting these events if they were about Trump? This is the same MSM that fraudulently labelled the Laptop Story as Russian disinformation during the last Presidential Election... Fair comment,as to the rest as I said that this is the best the US can come up with as leaders is worrying given their power. Maybe not - RFK looks like he might give Biden a run for his money.  |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Jun 19, 2023 7:46:58 GMT
Fair comment,as to the rest as I said that this is the best the US can come up with as leaders is worrying given their power. Maybe not - RFK looks like he might give Biden a run for his money. Anything got to be better than laurel & hardy  |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 19, 2023 8:54:47 GMT
Trunp vs RFK would be a political earthquake (a good earthquake)
Unfortunately, this would be prevented by the establishment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 19, 2023 9:01:20 GMT
Establishment stitch-ups are almost impossible to prove or to stop, we've all bear witness to that over the stitch-up of Johnson.
Trump is suffering the same fate, this is what happens when people can't win by being honest and fair, they have to resort to dirt tricks, and gutter politics, look at the state America is in under Biden, there is no way that man won the election fair and square.
We can only hope that those guilty will eventually be unmasked and suffer by the same establishment stitch-up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2023 12:02:49 GMT
There is and there always has been. A Labour source told Sky News: "Sue Gray has fully cooperated with ACOBA [Advisory Committee on Business Appointments] which is the proper process. "They have all the relevant details and are the ones who advise on these matters." The cabinet office held their own inquiry and this is the one Gray refused to particpate in. They are two different things, and you know it. The ACOBA process is to decide if she can take the job, so of course she is cooperating with them. She refused to talk to the Cabinet Office... I wonder why lol. You don't have a problem with her breaking the Ministerial Code and the terms of contract of employment? How very selective of you lol. Can you not see peoples problem with this? Starmer and Raynor have spent the last three years calling out Tory corruption, sleeze, rule breaking... yet they show zero fucking leadership when they are caught doing it themselves lol. This report is clear, she needed express permission to talk to the opposition, and she did not have it, so she broken the Ministerial Code and who have faced suspension and dismissal. I want a Social Democratic government, I've been calling this tactic out for 3 years. If your sole tactic is winning by finger pointing then you are going to be fucked when the fingers point back at you. Especially when you use sleazy lawyer technicalities to dodge taking responsibility for your actions. When the Labour sleaze is supported by Starmer's supporters on this forum you know Labour is supported by shit. A honest, intelligent and competent Starmer supporter is no where to be found. Labour is literally relying on hypocrisy and the corruption in the civil service for power. They offer absolutely nothing to the majority that is worth voting for. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2023 12:07:47 GMT
They are two different things, and you know it. The ACOBA process is to decide if she can take the job, so of course she is cooperating with them. She refused to talk to the Cabinet Office... I wonder why lol. You don't have a problem with her breaking the Ministerial Code and the terms of contract of employment? How very selective of you lol. Can you not see peoples problem with this? Starmer and Raynor have spent the last three years calling out Tory corruption, sleeze, rule breaking... yet they show zero fucking leadership when they are caught doing it themselves lol. This report is clear, she needed express permission to talk to the opposition, and she did not have it, so she broken the Ministerial Code and who have faced suspension and dismissal. I want a Social Democratic government, I've been calling this tactic out for 3 years. If your sole tactic is winning by finger pointing then you are going to be fucked when the fingers point back at you. Especially when you use sleazy lawyer technicalities to dodge taking responsibility for your actions. When the Labour sleaze is supported by Starmer's supporters on this forum you know Labour is supported by shit. A honest, intelligent and competent Starmer supporter is no where to be found. Labour is literally relying on hypocrisy and the corruption in the civil service for power. They offer absolutely nothing to the majority that is worth voting for. God how you must hate the UK and the institutions that we have had for centuries. Have you wondered why there was no such talk of the 'lefty civil service' blocking the government before Johnson became PM, because it only exists in the minds of Johnson and his supporters. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2023 12:09:05 GMT
Oh look, a hypocritical supporter of sleaze, corruption and decadence is still trying to lecture others on Boris. What odious little morally corrupt worms Starmer relies on. This is about Sue Gray and Labour's dependency on corruption and rulebreaking within the civil service.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 19, 2023 12:41:04 GMT
When the Labour sleaze is supported by Starmer's supporters on this forum you know Labour is supported by shit. A honest, intelligent and competent Starmer supporter is no where to be found. Labour is literally relying on hypocrisy and the corruption in the civil service for power. They offer absolutely nothing to the majority that is worth voting for. Have you wondered why there was no such talk of the 'lefty civil service' blocking the government before Johnson became PM, because it only exists in the minds of Johnson and his supporters. You really don't know anything about Starmer or his politics, do you? Otherwise you would know who really hates the UK and the institutions that we have had for centuries, and quite frankly there is no way you can squirm out of this one...
Labour leader Keir Starmer boasts of supporting 'the abolition of the monarchy' in rediscovered video clip as new report urges his party to embrace patriotism to win back voters who fled under Jeremy Corbyn
Sir Keir Starmer once boasted of supporting the abolition of the monarchy, a newly rediscovered video revealed today - as Labour was urged to become more patriotic to win back voters.
The Opposition leader was caught on camera in 2005 discussing the irony of being appointed a Queen's Counsel - a senior barrister - for a film about a court case he was involved in.
In a clip unearthed by the Guido Fawkes blog the then 39-year-old human rights lawyer said: 'I got made a Queen's Counsel, which is odd since I often used to propose the abolition of the monarchy.
The fuckin traitor ^^^
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2023 12:43:38 GMT
Oh look, a hypocritical supporter of sleaze, corruption and decadence is still trying to lecture others on Boris. What odious little morally corrupt worms Starmer relies on. This is about Sue Gray and Labour's dependency on corruption and rulebreaking within the civil service. She was cleared by the official inquiry. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2023 12:46:05 GMT
God how you must hate the UK and the institutions that we have had for centuries.Have you wondered why there was no such talk of the 'lefty civil service' blocking the government before Johnson became PM, because it only exists in the minds of Johnson and his supporters. You really don't know anything about Starmer or his politics, do you? Otherwise you would know who really hates the UK and the institutions that we have had for centuries, and quite frankly there is no way you can squirm out of this one...
Labour leader Keir Starmer boasts of supporting 'the abolition of the monarchy' in rediscovered video clip as new report urges his party to embrace patriotism to win back voters who fled under Jeremy Corbyn
Sir Keir Starmer once boasted of supporting the abolition of the monarchy, a newly rediscovered video revealed today - as Labour was urged to become more patriotic to win back voters.
The Opposition leader was caught on camera in 2005 discussing the irony of being appointed a Queen's Counsel - a senior barrister - for a film about a court case he was involved in.
In a clip unearthed by the Guido Fawkes blog the then 39-year-old human rights lawyer said: 'I got made a Queen's Counsel, which is odd since I often used to propose the abolition of the monarchy.
The fuckin traitor ^^^
Wrong again. I don't like Starmer, I think he is a liar and would sell his soul to become PM but that is nowhere near the scale of the corruption and sleaze in the entire Tory party and Johnson in particular. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2023 12:50:25 GMT
Oh look, a hypocritical supporter of sleaze, corruption and decadence is still trying to lecture others on Boris. What odious little morally corrupt worms Starmer relies on. This is about Sue Gray and Labour's dependency on corruption and rulebreaking within the civil service. She was cleared by the official inquiry. - dodgydave
Labour is dependent on corruption and rule breaking, whilst exposing their desperation to deflect and project by pointing the finger at the man who ate cake.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2023 13:02:49 GMT
You really don't know anything about Starmer or his politics, do you? Otherwise you would know who really hates the UK and the institutions that we have had for centuries, and quite frankly there is no way you can squirm out of this one...
Labour leader Keir Starmer boasts of supporting 'the abolition of the monarchy' in rediscovered video clip as new report urges his party to embrace patriotism to win back voters who fled under Jeremy Corbyn
Sir Keir Starmer once boasted of supporting the abolition of the monarchy, a newly rediscovered video revealed today - as Labour was urged to become more patriotic to win back voters.
The Opposition leader was caught on camera in 2005 discussing the irony of being appointed a Queen's Counsel - a senior barrister - for a film about a court case he was involved in.
In a clip unearthed by the Guido Fawkes blog the then 39-year-old human rights lawyer said: 'I got made a Queen's Counsel, which is odd since I often used to propose the abolition of the monarchy.
The fuckin traitor ^^^
Wrong again. I don't like Starmer, I think he is a liar and would sell his soul to become PM but that is nowhere near the scale of the corruption and sleaze in the entire Tory party and Johnson in particular. Ah, let me guess, an old Corbynite venting without a clue. Just mindless anti-Tory rhetoric and tantrums. Still, anyone who would spend so much time supporting Starmer, who they admit to him being a liar who sold his soul, is clearly not worth anyone's time.
Rishi outclasses him in everyway. Maybe you would be better off trying to get the racists on board.
EDIT: RedRum is a waste of time with an anti-Boris fixation. It isn't interested in the topic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2023 13:08:21 GMT
Wrong again. I don't like Starmer, I think he is a liar and would sell his soul to become PM but that is nowhere near the scale of the corruption and sleaze in the entire Tory party and Johnson in particular. Ah, let me guess, an old Corbynite venting without a clue. Just mindless anti-Tory rhetoric and tantrums. Still, anyone who would spend so much time supporting Starmer, who they admit to him being a liar who sold his soul, is clearly not worth anyone's time.
Rishi outclasses him in everyway. Maybe you would be better off trying to get the racists on board.
Can't hit me with Starmer so shift it to Corbyn, God you are a swerver. I admit that Starmer is a liar and has gone back on some of his promises and you don't like it because I tell the truth, so the truth is not worth someones time but that is to be expected from someone who is still trying to support Johnson. |
|
