climate change

I refer to an earlier comment I made to Zany:

I doubt you are going to get the opinions you seek, people are wise to those who seek opinions for no other reason than to dispute them ad infinitum.

....and so it has come to pass.

We heard you the first time. 

Apologies. I chose levelised because it says that accounts for the life time costs of electrical production. Is there a better method you prefer.

So a bit like working out the travel costs to Edinburgh for you to travel daily and comparing buying a car and driving to just going by train. Obviously first day the car costs a lot more what with buying it etc, but over 2 years it might work out cheaper. 

That's quite an ambiguous question. And answer

"In a study that surveyed 1,891 physicians, one-third reported that they “did not completely agree” that it is always necessary to inform patients of medical errors."

I can think of a few examples where telling the patient you had accidentally nicked an artery while operating would do more harm than good. Some one with dementia who doesn't fully understand might worry themselves sick about it.

The thing I find difficult with this subject is that it doesn't matter if I take the time to explain the science people still don't believe it. 
For instance I could go to a lot of trouble to explain.
That we can extract long ice cores to study the thousands of layers ice representing separate snowfalls and their trapped air bubbles. In controlled laboratory environments, we can measure the chemical makeup of the air that has been trapped - how much oxygen, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen gas was present in the atmosphere at the time it was buried in the ice. From these measurements, we can calculate past temperatures using empirical data on how these gases hold heat in the modern atmosphere.

Or use naturally occurring isotopes. Isotopes are atoms of the same element that are heavier or lighter depending on how many neutrons are in its nucleus. Even molecules of water, composed of one hydrogen atom and two oxygen atoms, can have different weights depending on what isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen are bonded together. The two most common isotopes of oxygen in nature are oxygen-16 (8 neutrons) and oxygen-18 (10 neutrons). When the Earth cools down, the lighter, oxygen-16 found in seawater is locked away in the ice of high latitude glaciers due to evaporative processes, leaving behind relatively more oxygen-18 in the oceans. During warm global climates, melted ice returns oxygen-16-rich waters to the oceans. So the proportion of oxygen-18 to oxygen-16 in the ocean reflects the Earth’s climate even if we can’t see the ice. Earth Scientists recognize this oxygen isotope pattern between glaciated and ice-free climates, referring to it as the “ice volume effect”, and have since used it to reconstruct ancient Earth climates.

Great long explanations, but next day the people who read your words are still saying the same things a though nothing changed. They don't challenge the information they just ignore it. 

That rather depends on if you believe wattsupwiththat. 

Why are they likely to be more honest than the NOAA

Friends arriving any minute . Speak tomorrow, have a good evening. 

How sad your Saturday nights are. 😂 🤣