Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2023 8:11:28 GMT
He was acclaimed as 'hero of the week' by GBnews because he 'manhandled' members of the public who happened to be protesting. There are a lot of people out there who would like to be considered 'hero of the week' by a national 'news' channel and image that going a bit further might clinch it for them. What else would you call it? I would call it stepping over the line, until someone became so annoyed by having their daily life affected by it. I guess for some people life is already short enough. That has nothing to do with a national 'tv' station hailing someone assaulting another a 'hero', no matter what the 'imagined' justification. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on May 27, 2023 8:12:27 GMT
I would call it stepping over the line, until someone became so annoyed by having their daily life affected by it. I guess for some people life is already short enough. That has nothing to do with a national 'tv' station hailing someone assaulting another a 'hero', no matter what the 'imagined' justification. Yes it does, don't ask if it isn't going to fit the mindset. |
|
|
|
GBNews,
May 27, 2023 8:17:35 GMT
via mobile
Post by johnofgwent on May 27, 2023 8:17:35 GMT
How in the world does a 'news' channel get away with this sort of behaviour? linkThe commentators idea of 'Hero of the week' is nothing more that an incitement to violence. There are crazy people in this country that will have watched that clip and listened to the comments and take an inevitable step further. I am not talking about the rights and wrongs of what the member of the public did but a channel that people listen too acting so irresponsibly. in a world where the forces of law and order stand idly by and let members of a terrorist organisation whose leader has openly stated his cause is far more important than the collateral damage of a few deaths of a few people caught up in the carnage carry out their terrorism, is it really surprising some citizens take the action we all know the politically controlled police should, used to, but won’t any more. I say well done that citizen. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2023 8:33:36 GMT
That has nothing to do with a national 'tv' station hailing someone assaulting another a 'hero', no matter what the 'imagined' justification. Yes it does, don't ask if it isn't going to fit the mindset. I have already said it is of no matter whether the protesters or the member of the public were right or wrong, it is only about the 'glorification' of violence by a national broadcaster. If you don't want to stick to the topic then post on an appropriate thread. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on May 27, 2023 8:35:35 GMT
Yes it does, don't ask if it isn't going to fit the mindset. I have already said it is of no matter whether the protesters or the member of the public were right or wrong, it is only about the 'glorification' of violence by a national broadcaster. If you don't want to stick to the topic then post on an appropriate thread. And I say they did no such thing, but instead you have invented it as part of a political procedure of they are right wing so the natural enemy. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2023 8:36:01 GMT
How in the world does a 'news' channel get away with this sort of behaviour? linkThe commentators idea of 'Hero of the week' is nothing more that an incitement to violence. There are crazy people in this country that will have watched that clip and listened to the comments and take an inevitable step further. I am not talking about the rights and wrongs of what the member of the public did but a channel that people listen too acting so irresponsibly. in a world where the forces of law and order stand idly by and let members of a terrorist organisation whose leader has openly stated his cause is far more important than the collateral damage of a few deaths of a few people caught up in the carnage carry out their terrorism, is it really surprising some citizens take the action we all know the politically controlled police should, used to, but won’t any more. I say well done that citizen. They are not terrorists, that is a stupid comment. I think you prove my point from the thread that it a dangerous thing for a broadcaster to do. |
|
|
|
GBNews,
May 27, 2023 10:04:45 GMT
via mobile
Post by johnofgwent on May 27, 2023 10:04:45 GMT
in a world where the forces of law and order stand idly by and let members of a terrorist organisation whose leader has openly stated his cause is far more important than the collateral damage of a few deaths of a few people caught up in the carnage carry out their terrorism, is it really surprising some citizens take the action we all know the politically controlled police should, used to, but won’t any more. I say well done that citizen. They are not terrorists, that is a stupid comment. I think you prove my point from the thread that it a dangerous thing for a broadcaster to do. Now did you, or did you not, see or hear the head of just stop oil state his cause was more important than the deaths of people prevented from getting to hospital. The moment he said that he crossed the line. When you advocate illegal civil disobedience as part of a strategy to achieve political change not wished for by the electorate then a democracy sends policemen with truncheons and handcuffs to bring you in to stand before a judge But when you state categorically that deaths of citizens are acceptable collateral damage from your illegal actions designed to force political change on an electorate that does not accept even the slightest part of your argument, then that same democratic society sends the SAS to blow you away before you get a chance to carry out your intent. The twat crossed the line when he declared the sick and injured fair game for the undertaker in his political protest and you know it Or do you think people unconnected with illegal political activity dying as a result of it acceptable ? Sounds very much like you di. A real Prime Minister would have proscribed that organisation the moment he heard their keaders words in this That he did not shows how weak and open to illegality in political activity he is |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on May 27, 2023 10:37:53 GMT
What's the point with you, you're a non-stop piece of rabble protest against humanity, nothing more than a little flower pot man. Then don't contribute but the stupid insults are tiresome and childish, grow up. I will contribute till my heart's content, if only to expose your constant whining and disagreement with almost everything that's said. I can't recall you ever seriously expressing agreement, it's all typically left-wing misery; I'm surprised anyone responds to you in a constructive way and when they do, you attempt to find something wrong to whinge about, so expect me to continue exposing your nonsense in any way I wish. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2023 12:33:09 GMT
They are not terrorists, that is a stupid comment. I think you prove my point from the thread that it a dangerous thing for a broadcaster to do. Now did you, or did you not, see or hear the head of just stop oil state his cause was more important than the deaths of people prevented from getting to hospital. The moment he said that he crossed the line. When you advocate illegal civil disobedience as part of a strategy to achieve political change not wished for by the electorate then a democracy sends policemen with truncheons and handcuffs to bring you in to stand before a judge But when you state categorically that deaths of citizens are acceptable collateral damage from your illegal actions designed to force political change on an electorate that does not accept even the slightest part of your argument, then that same democratic society sends the SAS to blow you away before you get a chance to carry out your intent. The twat crossed the line when he declared the sick and injured fair game for the undertaker in his political protest and you know it Or do you think people unconnected with illegal political activity dying as a result of it acceptable ? Sounds very much like you di. A real Prime Minister would have proscribed that organisation the moment he heard their keaders words in this That he did not shows how weak and open to illegality in political activity he is
This post is about GBNews and their 'salutations' of violence. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2023 12:33:58 GMT
Then don't contribute but the stupid insults are tiresome and childish, grow up. I will contribute till my heart's content, if only to expose your constant whining and disagreement with almost everything that's said. I can't recall you ever seriously expressing agreement, it's all typically left-wing misery; I'm surprised anyone responds to you in a constructive way and when they do, you attempt to find something wrong to whinge about, so expect me to continue exposing your nonsense in any way I wish. "stupid insults are tiresome and childish"? |
|
|
|
Post by piglet on May 27, 2023 12:39:17 GMT
I dont have a problem with it, if someone gets in my way, then i would remove them, in the context of the above. Thats the risk those people take, im not supine, gutless. If they break the law then ill take it into my hands, im surprised more havent done the same.
Then fight it out in court.
You cant have people taking society hostage......YOU CANT. And Red, your credibility, as in other posts is zero, i will take no notice of your garbage.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2023 12:55:16 GMT
I dont have a problem with it, if someone gets in my way, then i would remove them, in the context of the above. Thats the risk those people take, im not supine, gutless. If they break the law then ill take it into my hands, im surprised more havent done the same. Then fight it out in court. You cant have people taking society hostage......YOU CANT. And Red, your credibility, as in other posts is zero, i will take no notice of your garbage. So you don't understand my post either.😔 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2023 12:55:18 GMT
I dont know - he is a hero. Any guy who wants to get some work done in the age of workshy millennials and Gen Z skiving from home, is definitely heroic. The country needs more people like him. My point is that a 'national' TV station, no matter what you think of the man's actions, should not be 'encouraging' people to commit acts of violence against others. Maybe you can convince your children with these lies, but I can't see it working on normal people. When police force people off the road they're not acting with violence. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2023 12:56:19 GMT
Then don't contribute but the stupid insults are tiresome and childish, grow up. I will contribute till my heart's content, if only to expose your constant whining and disagreement with almost everything that's said. I can't recall you ever seriously expressing agreement, it's all typically left-wing misery; I'm surprised anyone responds to you in a constructive way and when they do, you attempt to find something wrong to whinge about, so expect me to continue exposing your nonsense in any way I wish. Listen to the whiner calling others whiners, you couldn't make it up.🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 27, 2023 13:21:55 GMT
RR is on a wind up here .
He’s in desperate need to be ignored , just as all lefties who indulge in hyperbole should be ignored .
I do hope no one said anything nasty to those poor demonstrators illegally blocking the road . Red Rum will tell us that speech can equate to violence too.
If he doesn’t another leftie might 🤡
|
|
