|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 21, 2023 14:56:24 GMT
That's because we have to say thank you very much for tuning in and watching this programme and our thanks to the producer, the stage manger, sound engineers and all the staff here at the BBC, which you can catch up on blar blar .co.uk and let me repeat this...
Now we have time for some adverts, telling you for the 50th time to watch this new series, and now we have a charity appeal on behalf of the Woke R US.
Next we would like to give you a rundown of programmes next week and an address to write to which I will repeat if you have not got a pen handy. Of course we have a theme tune to play you as well and perhaps after repeating the news headlines for the umpteen time today we can get back to some of the stuff you actually pay to watch or listen to.
Has anyone noticed how the BBC pads it out? Second point is the title of the thread is often heard when one has an awkward caller or an awkward point crops up in the debate. There was one the other day and the subject just happened to swivel around to a topic of AI in journalism. the presenter did not have the faintest clue, but was saved by the bell. Thank god for the credits.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2023 15:09:52 GMT
All the channels do the same Baron von Lotsov
The worst ones are the cheap commercial channels, and especially the hundreds of "fly on the wall" documentary type programmes about Hospitals, Air Ambulances and the Police. After each commercial break ( which incidentelly lasts almost as long as the actual programme segment ), they then proceed to explain to you what happened in the previous part of the programme.
Its not only frustrating, but condascending as well, but it cheaply fills in a bit of "run time" and progresses the episode on towards the profitable bit - the adverts.
I agree that it is annoying on the BBC, but I personally believe that the BBC is immensely more superior in quality and content than any commercial station.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 22, 2023 0:21:49 GMT
This is it. The rise of the commercial channels on the satellite has probably made the arrogant BBC think if they can get away with it then we can do it too but slightly less so it justifies the licence fee. Proles only think in binary (BBC better/worse than other).
I've noticed it in other places too. You get lectures on Youtube where I time how long it takes for the speaker to actually start speaking about what you went there to listen to. Sometimes it can be 5 minutes. That's five minutes of your life wasted times how many you watch. One reason I like youtube though is it gives you more control than a TV and it is more distributed, not chained to a franchise. For each producer who practices clickbait, uses other dodgy tricks, makes factual errors and a few other criteria I use, I just ban the channel. So what it does now is scrape the lower viewer rating videos because the clickbait is cheating the numbers. Popular = bad on Youtube.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on May 25, 2023 11:03:07 GMT
Its not only frustrating, but condascending as well, but it cheaply fills in a bit of "run time" and progresses the episode on towards the profitable bit - the adverts. I agree that it is annoying on the BBC, but I personally believe that the BBC is immensely more superior in quality and content than any commercial station. Ads are ruining Youtube … and the BBC. Like The Guardian newspaper these days … it’s economic model is broken because of it’s 8 year ridiculing and undermining of Brexit. It stabbed it’s original core financiers - licence payers - in the BACK. VERY INADVISABLE! 🤯 It’s now basically secretly supported financially by the Deep State and Globalists … as a leading Big Brother WOKE Propaganda Broadcasting Station with a rapidly fading Worldwide influence. …. Once the dinosaur naturist David Attenborough dies … that will be it for the Auntie Corporation. The heyday has passed … you can see that just by tuning into Radio 4 Extra and Nostalgia TV Channels broadcasting BBC fare … the chasm in comedy, science programming is most noticeable … they have lost their way and the best people jumped ship … fed up with poor wages and Islington zionist levels of exploitation. …. Even their Ofwatch/OfCom regulator is run by Islington-types … which is why no remedy was implemented … too late now … TRUST has completely evapourated. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2023 15:21:54 GMT
I do like reading conspiracy theories - even though I laugh at most of them
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 25, 2023 15:33:04 GMT
I do like reading conspiracy theories - even though I laugh at most of them My thread op did not rely on any little green men. You can verify yourself by going to Radio 4.
Actually I'm trying to get myself into the habit of sourcing more info from Youtube these days where if you right-click on a new video suggestion you can click an option of "don't recommend this channel again" which disappears once you start watching it, so I open videos in a new window and any who waste my time with clickbait or excessive infills of hype gets exterminated. It's quite satisfying having such control. What I have noticed is a strong correlation between these tricks used and dumb content. The most intelligent content gets straight down to business. So you can train the AI to get rid of it!
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on May 25, 2023 15:41:43 GMT
All the channels do the same Baron von Lotsov The worst ones are the cheap commercial channels, and especially the hundreds of "fly on the wall" documentary type programmes about Hospitals, Air Ambulances and the Police. After each commercial break ( which incidentelly lasts almost as long as the actual programme segment ), they then proceed to explain to you what happened in the previous part of the programme. Its not only frustrating, but condascending as well, but it cheaply fills in a bit of "run time" and progresses the episode on towards the profitable bit - the adverts. I agree that it is annoying on the BBC, but I personally believe that the BBC is immensely more superior in quality and content than any commercial station. Doesn't BBC TV also format its programmes where possible for sale to other broadcasters and repeats on commercial channels?
Some of the other channels are owned/operated by UKTV, which is a subsidiary of BBC studios — so I'm not certain where the line between non-commercial and commercial is drawn. But it makes sense to produce material suitable for as many outlets as possible...
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 27, 2023 13:27:20 GMT
A BBC phone in programme on Radio 4 a moment ago on heat pumps hosted by a blonde.
A Scotsman phones in and he is a thermodynamic engineer, someone who has actually done the science like I have. He claims they don't work well in Scotland due to the outside temperature dropping to minus 15. He was then explaining why this is. He said they are all rated with a coefficient of efficiency, but he could not go any further as the blonde said we are getting too technical here and I don't understand it so we are going to have to move on.
Next we get the blonde repeating the phone number for people to phone in. How ironic. Someone phones in, they get cut off for knowing what they are talking about so they ask for others to phone in.
In case you were wondering, what he was about to say was the rated CoE is measured at an outside temperature of much warmer than minus 15 because the CoE depends on the difference in the outside temperature and the temperature you run your radiators at. BBC often have experts telling them the larger radiators running cooler are more efficient, but neglect entirely to point out it is equally true if the difference is the other way, i.e. higher outside temperature, since it depends on one minus the other. It's simple schoolchildren level of maths to grasp this point, but the BBC insists on employing idiots.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on May 27, 2023 14:10:25 GMT
A BBC phone in programme on Radio 4 a moment ago on heat pumps hosted by a blonde. A Scotsman phones in and he is a thermodynamic engineer, someone who has actually done the science like I have. He claims they don't work well in Scotland due to the outside temperature dropping to minus 15. He was then explaining why this is. He said they are all rated with a coefficient of efficiency, but he could not go any further as the blonde said we are getting too technical here and I don't understand it so we are going to have to move on. Next we get the blonde repeating the phone number for people to phone in. How ironic. Someone phones in, they get cut off for knowing what they are talking about so they ask for others to phone in. In case you were wondering, what he was about to say was the rated CoE is measured at an outside temperature of much warmer than minus 15 because the CoE depends on the difference in the outside temperature and the temperature you run your radiators at. BBC often have experts telling them the larger radiators running cooler are more efficient, but neglect entirely to point out it is equally true if the difference is the other way, i.e. higher outside temperature, since it depends on one minus the other. It's simple schoolchildren level of maths to grasp this point, but the BBC insists on employing idiots. Blonde?
If it's what I listened to, the host was Anita Anand...
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 27, 2023 15:54:38 GMT
A BBC phone in programme on Radio 4 a moment ago on heat pumps hosted by a blonde. A Scotsman phones in and he is a thermodynamic engineer, someone who has actually done the science like I have. He claims they don't work well in Scotland due to the outside temperature dropping to minus 15. He was then explaining why this is. He said they are all rated with a coefficient of efficiency, but he could not go any further as the blonde said we are getting too technical here and I don't understand it so we are going to have to move on. Next we get the blonde repeating the phone number for people to phone in. How ironic. Someone phones in, they get cut off for knowing what they are talking about so they ask for others to phone in. In case you were wondering, what he was about to say was the rated CoE is measured at an outside temperature of much warmer than minus 15 because the CoE depends on the difference in the outside temperature and the temperature you run your radiators at. BBC often have experts telling them the larger radiators running cooler are more efficient, but neglect entirely to point out it is equally true if the difference is the other way, i.e. higher outside temperature, since it depends on one minus the other. It's simple schoolchildren level of maths to grasp this point, but the BBC insists on employing idiots. Blonde?
If it's what I listened to, the host was Anita Anand...
Yes blonde, but in mental capacity. Think Benny Hill and you'd be about right. Bloke interviewing her at BBC for a job "Ah hmm those look big enough, oops I mean that looks good enough", quickly glancing back to her CV. You're hired on full pay, done! |
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on May 31, 2023 10:56:56 GMT
I do like reading conspiracy theories - even though I laugh at most of them My thread op did not rely on any little green men. You can verify yourself by going to Radio 4.
Actually I'm trying to get myself into the habit of sourcing more info from Youtube these days where if you right-click on a new video suggestion you can click an option of "don't recommend this channel again" which disappears once you start watching it, so I open videos in a new window and any who waste my time with clickbait or excessive infills of hype gets exterminated. It's quite satisfying having such control. What I have noticed is a strong correlation between these tricks used and dumb content. The most intelligent content gets straight down to business. So you can train the AI to get rid of it! What the heck has my post got to do with “little green men” ?? … stop pandering to lightweights like Sidfiddler and Tinculin … whose only reply to a POV is to label things ‘CT’ and try and marginalise certain discussions. [Maybe if you actually engaged with the evidence on my ‘alien’ thread … you might actually ‘learn something important’ that’s happened in Earth’s history these past 5,000 years? … instead of, like many scientists, sticking their collective heads up their prissy scientific arses and ignoring it … arguably setting back humanity technologically since WW2] A BBC phone in programme on Radio 4 a moment ago on heat pumps hosted by a blonde. A Scotsman phones in and he is a thermodynamic engineer, someone who has actually done the science like I have. He claims they don't work well in Scotland due to the outside temperature dropping to minus 15. He was then explaining why this is. He said they are all rated with a coefficient of efficiency, but he could not go any further as the blonde said we are getting too technical here and I don't understand it so we are going to have to move on. Next we get the blonde repeating the phone number for people to phone in. How ironic. Someone phones in, they get cut off for knowing what they are talking about so they ask for others to phone in. In case you were wondering, what he was about to say was the rated CoE is measured at an outside temperature of much warmer than minus 15 because the CoE depends on the difference in the outside temperature and the temperature you run your radiators at. BBC often have experts telling them the larger radiators running cooler are more efficient, but neglect entirely to point out it is equally true if the difference is the other way, i.e. higher outside temperature, since it depends on one minus the other. It's simple schoolchildren level of maths to grasp this point, but the BBC insists on employing idiots. Blonde? If it's what I listened to, the host was Anita Anand... They had Lenny Henry hosting a programme on Opera a while back … naturally a BLM diversity shoe-in … he started off by spouting off how little he knew about “Opera” … as if it was something to be proud of … then he spent the rest of the programme cooing about how good this and that bit was … “oh, I like that …” …. So insulting and dumbed down for true opera lovers. BBC Management today are lobotomised knee-jerk WOKE morons who can’t programme outside Guardianista edicts … That Henry abortion was almost as bad as Brian Cox’s “Universe” series …. a dumbed down hallucinogenic, scientifically-insulting Worldwide road trip conducted by Cox when the rest of us were forced into lockdown by the BBC’s failure to call out Big Pharma on it’s Totalitarianism Agenda. BBC Radio 4 is unlistenable now … and their dumbed down content and non-comedy - plus WOKE podcast bollox overload … is badly damaging Radio 4 Extra now. 🙄🤯 FFS … someone drop a nuclear device on this Islington Collective … before every intelligent person on the Planet is driven dumb by WOKE drivel à la BBC/CH4/MSM et al. |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on May 31, 2023 11:04:57 GMT
My thread op did not rely on any little green men. You can verify yourself by going to Radio 4.
Actually I'm trying to get myself into the habit of sourcing more info from Youtube these days where if you right-click on a new video suggestion you can click an option of "don't recommend this channel again" which disappears once you start watching it, so I open videos in a new window and any who waste my time with clickbait or excessive infills of hype gets exterminated. It's quite satisfying having such control. What I have noticed is a strong correlation between these tricks used and dumb content. The most intelligent content gets straight down to business. So you can train the AI to get rid of it! What the heck has my post got to do with “little green men” ?? … stop pandering to lightweights like Sidfiddler and Tinculin … whose only reply to a POV is to label things ‘CT’ and try and marginalise certain discussions. [Maybe if you actually engaged with the evidence on my ‘alien’ thread … you might actually ‘learn something important’ that’s happened in Earth’s history these past 5,000 years? … instead of, like many scientists, sticking their collective heads up their prissy scientific arses and ignoring it … arguably setting back humanity technologically since WW2] Blonde? If it's what I listened to, the host was Anita Anand... They had Lenny Henry hosting a programme on Opera a while back … naturally a BLM diversity shoe-in … he started off by spouting off how little he knew about “Opera” … as if it was something to be proud of … then he spent the rest of the programme cooing about how good this and that bit was … “oh, I like that …” …. So insulting and dumbed down for true opera lovers. BBC Management today are lobotomised knee-jerk WOKE morons who can’t programme outside Guardianista edicts … That Henry abortion was almost as bad as Brian Cox’s “Universe” series …. a dumbed down hallucinogenic, scientifically- insulting road trip conducted by Cox when we were forced into lockdown by the BBC’s failure to call out Big Pharma on it’s Totalitarianism Agenda. Opera lovers deserve everything they get. I'd rather listen to bagpipes. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 31, 2023 11:09:54 GMT
I watched a spoof of Sherlock Holmes, Holmes opens a envelope and says 'Watson I think someone is out to kill us', Watson replies 'why Holmes'?, we've been sent two tickets to the opera ...... LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on May 31, 2023 11:12:05 GMT
Opera lovers deserve everything they get. I'd rather listen to bagpipes. 😂 … Not my No.1 choice in music either … but every genre deserves to have an ‘expert’ at the helm. …. Me cancelling my TV Licence 2 years ago didn’t defund the BBC to the extent of a Lenny Henry shoe-in … surely?? 🤪 |
|
