|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 12, 2023 13:27:58 GMT
That is how much Huawei has put into quantum computer research and the result of which has bought them a patent.
Well done to Ren Zhengfei
|
|
|
|
Post by besoeker3 on May 12, 2023 14:35:36 GMT
华为公布超导量子芯片专利
2022-11-04 10:41:54 来源：EETOP
国家知识产权局信息显示，11月1日，华为技术有限公司“超导量子芯片”专利公布，公布号为华为公布超导量子芯片专利
2022-11-04 10:41:54 来源：EETOP
国家知识产权局信息显示，11月1日，华为技术有限公司“超导量子芯片”专利公布，公布号为
So what do you think about this Mr BVL?
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 12, 2023 15:00:26 GMT
华为公布超导量子芯片专利 2022-11-04 10:41:54 来源：EETOP 国家知识产权局信息显示，11月1日，华为技术有限公司“超导量子芯片”专利公布，公布号为华为公布超导量子芯片专利 2022-11-04 10:41:54 来源：EETOP 国家知识产权局信息显示，11月1日，华为技术有限公司“超导量子芯片”专利公布，公布号为 So what do you think about this Mr BVL? The problem up until now is there are basically two ways of building a quantum computer, one is using light at room temperature and the other way is a group of methods that require almost absolute zero for correct operation because thermal energy creates noise in the signal and destroys the coherence of the quantum state, making it flip to a classical system. So the problem here reduces into a simple model of a transmitting device sending a signal to a receiving device such that the receiver will get its data without error due to thermal noise. This is the problem this patent solves and it apparently does it without error, like perfectly. Exactly how it does it, I'm unsure. I have not had time to read the entire patent. There was some similar work on this same problem in Oxford and I know how that works. Also bear in mind it is not just good enough that it works, but it needs to be something that can be manufactured and on a chip as well. |
|
|
|
Post by besoeker3 on May 12, 2023 18:04:05 GMT
华为公布超导量子芯片专利 2022-11-04 10:41:54 来源：EETOP 国家知识产权局信息显示，11月1日，华为技术有限公司“超导量子芯片”专利公布，公布号为华为公布超导量子芯片专利 2022-11-04 10:41:54 来源：EETOP 国家知识产权局信息显示，11月1日，华为技术有限公司“超导量子芯片”专利公布，公布号为 So what do you think about this Mr BVL? The problem up until now is there are basically two ways of building a quantum computer, one is using light at room temperature and the other way is a group of methods that require almost absolute zero for correct operation because thermal energy creates noise in the signal and destroys the coherence of the quantum state, making it flip to a classical system. So the problem here reduces into a simple model of a transmitting device sending a signal to a receiving device such that the receiver will get its data without error due to thermal noise. This is the problem this patent solves and it apparently does it without error, like perfectly. Exactly how it does it, I'm unsure. I have not had time to read the entire patent. There was some similar work on this same problem in Oxford and I know how that works. Also bear in mind it is not just good enough that it works, but it needs to be something that can be manufactured and on a chip as well. I think you missed the point. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 12, 2023 20:51:01 GMT
The problem up until now is there are basically two ways of building a quantum computer, one is using light at room temperature and the other way is a group of methods that require almost absolute zero for correct operation because thermal energy creates noise in the signal and destroys the coherence of the quantum state, making it flip to a classical system. So the problem here reduces into a simple model of a transmitting device sending a signal to a receiving device such that the receiver will get its data without error due to thermal noise. This is the problem this patent solves and it apparently does it without error, like perfectly. Exactly how it does it, I'm unsure. I have not had time to read the entire patent. There was some similar work on this same problem in Oxford and I know how that works. Also bear in mind it is not just good enough that it works, but it needs to be something that can be manufactured and on a chip as well. I think you missed the point. Tell us all what the point is and where you might find it. |
|
|
|
Post by seniorcitizen007 on May 13, 2023 6:51:13 GMT
In the 90s there was a 'Tomorrow's World' episode devoted to a new computer technology that used proteins (they showed vats being used to make the proteins). "Within ten years" they said, there would be dirt cheap home computers many billions of times faster than anything around at the time. A single one of these computers could store "all human knowledge" ... and be continuously updated. The theory had been worked out it was just "an engineering" problem that needed to be sorted and we'd have every tiny morsel of human knowledge ... every film, record, TV and radio broadcast, etc. ever produced, at our fingertips.
I'm intrigued by what's been posted so far. Can one of you recommend sites worth looking into that explain Quantum computers in a way that I can get my head around them in a couple of hours?
|
|
|
|
Post by besoeker3 on May 13, 2023 8:31:40 GMT
I think you missed the point. Tell us all what the point is and where you might find it. It was exactly what I said it was several points ago. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 13, 2023 11:23:05 GMT
In the 90s there was a 'Tomorrow's World' episode devoted to a new computer technology that used proteins (they showed vats being used to make the proteins). "Within ten years" they said, there would be dirt cheap home computers many billions of times faster than anything around at the time. A single one of these computers could store "all human knowledge" ... and be continuously updated. The theory had been worked out it was just "an engineering" problem that needed to be sorted and we'd have very tiny morsel of human knowledge ... every film, record, TV and radio broadcast, etc. ever produced, at our fingertips. I'm intrigued by what's been posted so far. Can one of you recommend sites worth looking into that explain Quantum computers in a way that I can get my head around them in a couple of hours? Most who do this don't understand it themselves so will leave you confused as they are. The best talk I can think of so far is from TuringQ. This guy is a genius and reviews the latest work his two teams have produced. He has one team from the Chinese Academy of Science and one from private equity, which is his company.
Anyway, have a go at this. It is aimed at the layman, but not the stupid (BBC audiences).
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on May 13, 2023 11:32:31 GMT
In the 90s there was a 'Tomorrow's World' episode devoted to a new computer technology that used proteins (they showed vats being used to make the proteins). "Within ten years" they said, there would be dirt cheap home computers many billions of times faster than anything around at the time. A single one of these computers could store "all human knowledge" ... and be continuously updated. The theory had been worked out it was just "an engineering" problem that needed to be sorted and we'd have very tiny morsel of human knowledge ... every film, record, TV and radio broadcast, etc. ever produced, at our fingertips. I'm intrigued by what's been posted so far. Can one of you recommend sites worth looking into that explain Quantum computers in a way that I can get my head around them in a couple of hours? I think, without a very solid physics background, you might struggle to understanding how quantum computers work. They aren't very strongly analogous to any of the kinds of mechanism most non experts are familiar with. However, that doesn't mean common sense boxes can't be constructed around the claims. The situation is very similar to the one you describe in your post; the potential is huge - indeed mind numbing - but there are 'engineering problems'. With quantum computers the engineering problems are huge. If we map quantum computer tech to the history of normal computers, we are probably somewhere in the 19th century - there are 'computers' of sorts (heath Robinson jobs), but there is no generalisation. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 13, 2023 12:01:58 GMT
Your video has 31 000 likes, where mine has 19. What does that tell you?
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 13, 2023 12:30:35 GMT
Another one just popped up which you might find interesting. There is probably some overlap in what the first one says, but never-the-less it looks like it gives a good few of the basic points one needs to learn to get an idea of how it is done, what is done and what it does.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 13, 2023 12:32:07 GMT
Another one just popped up which you might find interesting. There is probably some overlap in what the first one says, but never-the-less it looks like it gives a good few of the basic points one needs to learn to get an idea of how it is done, what is done and what it does. Incidently, always get your info from the practitioner. It's no good getting it 4th or 5th hand. It ends up like Chinese whispers. |
|
