Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2023 11:57:29 GMT
Well a bit of Irony one, nobody really wants to vote for and two one nobody voted for as Prime minister. Are you on the wine? |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Apr 10, 2023 12:19:51 GMT
Well a bit of Irony one, nobody really wants to vote for and two one nobody voted for as Prime minister. Are you on the wine? No he relies on you to whine   |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2023 12:49:34 GMT
He is so frigging dumb mate he cannot see how he degrades any integrity that he may have by his own self demeaning. He's got a screw lose, he can't see what a double standard hypocrite he is coming across as, 'people in glasshouses shouldn't throw stones' springs to mind.
He really doesn't understand that we are going to call him out on his own failings, and why' under his watch one of the worst pedophiles in history 'Savile' slipped through the net.
Saville didn't slip through any net, the problem was that the only victim of Savile's who made a complaint to the police about him, was not prepared to stand as a witness in order for the police to seek a prosecution. So the decision of whether or not to prosecute Savile never reached Starmer. Not that it matters to you or your ilk. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2023 12:52:21 GMT
Starmer is dumb, there is no other word to describe him, by trying to trash Sunak all he is doing is raking up his own inadequacies and failings. He needed to shake off his connection with lefty human rights lawyers, and his failings to prosecute Savile and others, so all he has done is draw attention to himself, those who didn't know how incompetent and inept he was at previous positions, well they know now. Starmer has lost more than he has gained ... the idiot. He is so frigging dumb mate he cannot see how he degrades any integrity that he may have by his own self demeaning. What, by imitating the Tories, if he did. Well I guess that would make some sort of sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 10, 2023 12:56:19 GMT
He's got a screw lose, he can't see what a double standard hypocrite he is coming across as, 'people in glasshouses shouldn't throw stones' springs to mind.
He really doesn't understand that we are going to call him out on his own failings, and why' under his watch one of the worst pedophiles in history 'Savile' slipped through the net.
Saville didn't slip through any net, the problem was that the only victim of Savile's who made a complaint to the police about him, was not prepared to stand as a witness in order for the police to seek a prosecution. So the decision of whether or not to prosecute Savile never reached Starmer. Not that it matters to you or your ilk. Don't be daft, even Savile's own personal secretary, his chauffeur, most of the production team on TOTPs knew what the peado was up to, in fact even Uncle Tom Cobley and all, the only one who didn't know was the one who was supposed to.. DPP Director of Public Prosecutions .. Starmer, stupid fucker that he is. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2023 13:00:57 GMT
IIRC Harriet Harman naively, as a member of some free speech organisation made a point of accepting free speech for a pedophile campaign group that joined the group she was in. There is no evidence or charge against her that she was involved in pedophilia. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2023 13:06:30 GMT
Saville didn't slip through any net, the problem was that the only victim of Savile's who made a complaint to the police about him, was not prepared to stand as a witness in order for the police to seek a prosecution. So the decision of whether or not to prosecute Savile never reached Starmer. Not that it matters to you or your ilk. Don't be daft, even Savile's own personal secretary, his chauffeur, most of the production team on TOTPs knew what the peado was up to, in fact even Uncle Tom Cobley and all, the only one who didn't know was the one who was supposed to.. DPP Director of Public Prosecutions .. Starmer, stupid fucker that he is. Don't be so ridiculous, first off Starmer was not there to make a case against anyone, he was there to decide on whether a case put to him was fit for prosecution, and NO CASE AGAINST SAVILLE WAS PUT TO HIM. Your stupid post proves just how easily you can fool yourself into believing anything you want to believe in. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 10, 2023 13:11:10 GMT
Don't be daft, even Savile's own personal secretary, his chauffeur, most of the production team on TOTPs knew what the peado was up to, in fact even Uncle Tom Cobley and all, the only one who didn't know was the one who was supposed to.. DPP Director of Public Prosecutions .. Starmer, stupid fucker that he is. Don't be so ridiculous, first off Starmer was not there to make a case against anyone, he was there to decide on whether a case put to him was fit for prosecution, and NO CASE AGAINST SAVILLE WAS PUT TO HIM. Your stupid post proves just how easily you can fool yourself into believing anything you want to believe in. The DPP, through the CPS, is responsible for the conduct of all criminal prosecutions instituted by the police and he may intervene in any criminal proceedings when it appears to him to be appropriate. Some statutes require the consent of the DPP to prosecution.
He couldn't be arsed looking in to Savile, too many of his pals in the Labour party were involved, he knew Savile would bring them all down with him.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2023 13:15:41 GMT
Don't be so ridiculous, first off Starmer was not there to make a case against anyone, he was there to decide on whether a case put to him was fit for prosecution, and NO CASE AGAINST SAVILLE WAS PUT TO HIM. Your stupid post proves just how easily you can fool yourself into believing anything you want to believe in. The DPP, through the CPS, is responsible for the conduct of all criminal prosecutions instituted by the police and he may intervene in any criminal proceedings when it appears to him to be appropriate. Some statutes require the consent of the DPP to prosecution.
He couldn't be arsed looking in to Savile, too many of his pals in the Labour party were involved, he knew Savile would bring them all down with him.
No one with one iota of common sense would take any notice of your OPINIONS on this matter. If you want to continue with this matter then post provable facts, not your biased opinions. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Apr 10, 2023 13:21:18 GMT
Starmer proving that the labour party now lives in the gutter........Check the facts before opening your big mouth Starmer........But they were crying when people said it about them over JS haha so that means that political parties can finally launch attacks on the Labour Party too, without them or him moaning. 'You ain't seen nothing yet': Labour plans new attacks on Rishi Sunak over the economy as Keir Starmer says there will be 'zero apologies' for paedo smears targeting the PM Critics, including hardliners in his own party, described it as gutter politics Starmer is standing by his party's stance and backs 'every word Labour has said' www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11956059/Labour-plans-new-attacks-Sunak-Starmer-says-zero-apologies-paedo-jibe.html
Bit of a risky stance given that Labour have long been the paedo party.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 10, 2023 13:30:51 GMT
The DPP, through the CPS, is responsible for the conduct of all criminal prosecutions instituted by the police and he may intervene in any criminal proceedings when it appears to him to be appropriate. Some statutes require the consent of the DPP to prosecution.
He couldn't be arsed looking in to Savile, too many of his pals in the Labour party were involved, he knew Savile would bring them all down with him.
No one with one iota of common sense would take any notice of your OPINIONS on this matter. If you want to continue with this matter then post provable facts, not your biased opinions. "The DPP, through the CPS, is responsible for the conduct of all criminal prosecutions instituted by the police and he may intervene in any criminal proceedings when it appears to him to be appropriate. Some statutes require the consent of the DPP to prosecution".
^^^ That is 100% fact, google it for yourself, nothing to do with my own 'opinions'.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2023 14:01:30 GMT
No one with one iota of common sense would take any notice of your OPINIONS on this matter. If you want to continue with this matter then post provable facts, not your biased opinions. "The DPP, through the CPS, is responsible for the conduct of all criminal prosecutions instituted by the police and he may intervene in any criminal proceedings when it appears to him to be appropriate. Some statutes require the consent of the DPP to prosecution".
^^^ That is 100% fact, google it for yourself, nothing to do with my own 'opinions'.
That is what I have been saying all along. No case was put to Starmer by the Police. The system is that the police become aware of a possible prosecution they put their case together and hand it over to the Lawyers, who check it over and then pass it on to the DPP for prosecutions to take place. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Apr 10, 2023 15:40:29 GMT
IIRC Harriet Harman naively, as a member of some free speech organisation made a point of accepting free speech for a pedophile campaign group that joined the group she was in. There is no evidence or charge against her that she was involved in pedophilia. I didn't say there was but it proved to be a poor decision on her part. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 10, 2023 15:58:10 GMT
"The DPP, through the CPS, is responsible for the conduct of all criminal prosecutions instituted by the police and he may intervene in any criminal proceedings when it appears to him to be appropriate. Some statutes require the consent of the DPP to prosecution".
^^^ That is 100% fact, google it for yourself, nothing to do with my own 'opinions'.
That is what I have been saying all along. No case was put to Starmer by the Police. The system is that the police become aware of a possible prosecution they put their case together and hand it over to the Lawyers, who check it over and then pass it on to the DPP for prosecutions to take place. Are you really thick or what?
The police put their case to the DPP and then it's in the lap of the DPP, therefore it can't be INSTITUTED BY THE POLICE...Because the DPP have told them to FUCK OFF there is no case to answer for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 10, 2023 16:00:36 GMT
Keir Starmer led the CPS when it did not charge Jimmy Savile. Keir Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions when it was decided there was insufficient evidence to charge Savile.
|
|
