Post by jonksy on Apr 5, 2023 23:18:38 GMT
Tonight and fell asleep, did I miss anything?..........He's frightened if saying anything to upset anyone, you cant be a strong leader without upsetting someone, his constant contradictions dont give me any faith in him whatsoever, weak and meak...
'Lacking in vision': The Guardian delivers a withering verdict on 'dull' Starmer and says that 'no one knows what he stands for'
Scathing column in The Guardian marked Starmer's third year in his post
Scathing column in The Guardian marked Starmer's third year in his post
The Guardian – bible of the Left – has issued a scathing assessment of Starmer, calling him 'dull' and lacking in 'vision'.
Despite previously endorsing the Labour leader to be Britain's next prime minister, the newspaper has said his 'meaningless' policy launches have left Rishi Sunak with a chance of remaining in No 10.
Yesterday's editorial column marking Starmer's three years in post also claimed that his most distinctive actions have been supposedly 'purging' his opponents on the Left of the party.
Despite previously endorsing the Labour leader to be Britain's next prime minister, the newspaper has said his 'meaningless' policy launches have left Rishi Sunak with a chance of remaining in No 10.
Yesterday's editorial column marking Starmer's three years in post also claimed that his most distinctive actions have been supposedly 'purging' his opponents on the Left of the party.
The Guardian has issued a scathing assessment of Labour leader Starmer, calling him
'dull' and lacking in 'vision' in an editorial column marking his three years in post
The newspaper wrote: 'The mistake has been a lack of what Americans call 'the vision thing'. No one knows what Starmer or his party clearly stand for – apart from attacking its Left flank.' Or insisting that women have a penis.
'None of Starmer's phrases have so far created public excitement about the idea of change,' the column continued. 'Instead of building the party to fill a gap in politics and give Labour a distinctive electoral appeal, Starmer gambled that the Tories would implode. That bet has not paid off.'
'None of Starmer's phrases have so far created public excitement about the idea of change,' the column continued. 'Instead of building the party to fill a gap in politics and give Labour a distinctive electoral appeal, Starmer gambled that the Tories would implode. That bet has not paid off.'