|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Mar 31, 2023 10:33:46 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65132827So lets get the facts straight shall we This bloke, for whatever reason, sues a celebrity worth millions for three hundred grand saying she acted in a way that meant her negligent behaviour injured him She countersues for one dollar plus her legal fees. She wins And the BBC knowing full well a celebrity libel trial awarding one penny is itself a libellous remark in the minds of every reader, goes out snd says ‘Paltrow awarded one dollar by trial verdict’ When the truth is ‘Jury find celebrity entirely without blame for ski-ing incident which other party is judged 100% to blame for, and awards celebrity every cent she sought in damages’ Bloody BBC Bias
|
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Mar 31, 2023 11:25:44 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65132827So lets get the facts straight shall we This bloke, for whatever reason, sues a celebrity worth millions for three hundred grand saying she acted in a way that meant her negligent behaviour injured him She countersues for one dollar plus her legal fees. She wins And the BBC knowing full well a celebrity libel trial awarding one penny is itself a libellous remark in the minds of every reader, goes out snd says ‘Paltrow awarded one dollar by trial verdict’ When the truth is ‘Jury find celebrity entirely without blame for ski-ing incident which other party is judged 100% to blame for, and awards celebrity every cent she sought in damages’ Bloody BBC Bias She was awarded only a paltrow amount wasn't she though?  |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Mar 31, 2023 11:31:23 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65132827So lets get the facts straight shall we This bloke, for whatever reason, sues a celebrity worth millions for three hundred grand saying she acted in a way that meant her negligent behaviour injured him She countersues for one dollar plus her legal fees. She wins And the BBC knowing full well a celebrity libel trial awarding one penny is itself a libellous remark in the minds of every reader, goes out snd says ‘Paltrow awarded one dollar by trial verdict’ When the truth is ‘Jury find celebrity entirely without blame for ski-ing incident which other party is judged 100% to blame for, and awards celebrity every cent she sought in damages’ Bloody BBC Bias Jeez John get a grip The BBC clearly say as their headline: 'Gwyneth Paltrow awarded $1 and cleared of fault over ski crash ' www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65132827 |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 31, 2023 16:44:41 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65132827So lets get the facts straight shall we This bloke, for whatever reason, sues a celebrity worth millions for three hundred grand saying she acted in a way that meant her negligent behaviour injured him She countersues for one dollar plus her legal fees. She wins And the BBC knowing full well a celebrity libel trial awarding one penny is itself a libellous remark in the minds of every reader, goes out snd says ‘Paltrow awarded one dollar by trial verdict’ When the truth is ‘Jury find celebrity entirely without blame for ski-ing incident which other party is judged 100% to blame for, and awards celebrity every cent she sought in damages’ Bloody BBC Bias She was awarded only a paltrow amount wasn't she though? She was awarded the sum she asked for. She counter sued him for her costs plus $1. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Mar 31, 2023 16:50:19 GMT
She was awarded only a paltrow amount wasn't she though? She was awarded the sum she asked for. She counter sued him for her costs plus $1. Sorry Red I was being a bit ,well I thought it funny.
Paltrow/Paltry  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2023 17:45:15 GMT
She was awarded only a paltrow amount wasn't she though? You're wasted here. Went right over someone's head - whoosh. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Mar 31, 2023 18:26:01 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65132827So lets get the facts straight shall we This bloke, for whatever reason, sues a celebrity worth millions for three hundred grand saying she acted in a way that meant her negligent behaviour injured him She countersues for one dollar plus her legal fees. She wins And the BBC knowing full well a celebrity libel trial awarding one penny is itself a libellous remark in the minds of every reader, goes out snd says ‘Paltrow awarded one dollar by trial verdict’ When the truth is ‘Jury find celebrity entirely without blame for ski-ing incident which other party is judged 100% to blame for, and awards celebrity every cent she sought in damages’ Bloody BBC Bias The actress Gwyneth, but the media taketh away… |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 31, 2023 19:32:31 GMT
She was awarded the sum she asked for. She counter sued him for her costs plus $1. Sorry Red I was being a bit ,well I thought it funny.
Paltrow/Paltry Oh yes of course, and very funny it was. But some people, particularly those who listen to the BBC, may be of the opinion it was the courts decision to award her just $1.  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 31, 2023 19:34:21 GMT
She was awarded only a paltrow amount wasn't she though? You're wasted here. Went right over someone's head - whoosh. Cheeky bitch. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 31, 2023 20:52:54 GMT
Errrrr, OK. I'm not sure I understand that tbh. Is it Trumpton? You know - Pugh, Pugh, Barney McGrew, Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb'.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Apr 1, 2023 0:39:34 GMT
Errrrr, OK. I'm not sure I understand that tbh. Is it Trumpton? You know - Pugh, Pugh, Barney McGrew, Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb'. No, they’re Octarine Watch |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 1, 2023 0:41:26 GMT
Errrrr, OK. I'm not sure I understand that tbh. Is it Trumpton? You know - Pugh, Pugh, Barney McGrew, Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb'. No, they’re Octarine Watch I just googled that. And I'm still confused... |
|
