|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2023 13:06:20 GMT
But you are comparing them to rats… To make a point. Orwell compared decent people to all sorts of animals in Animal Farm. No insult is intended. Sounds more like Nazi rhetoric . |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Mar 18, 2023 13:09:34 GMT
To make a point. Orwell compared decent people to all sorts of animals in Animal Farm. No insult is intended. Sounds more like Nazi rhetoric . So does Animal Farm, in that case. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Mar 18, 2023 13:11:11 GMT
To make a point. Orwell compared decent people to all sorts of animals in Animal Farm. No insult is intended. Sounds more like Nazi rhetoric . By the way, who do you think would win the court case: X (who has the dump on his land) or the neighbour? Forget about the wider context of refugees, etc. Just imagine it is an ordinary case in the tort of nuisance appearing before a UK court. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2023 13:16:49 GMT
Sounds more like Nazi rhetoric . So does Animal Farm, in that case. Don’t compare yourself to Orwell darling .😁 |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Mar 18, 2023 13:19:04 GMT
So does Animal Farm, in that case. Don’t compare yourself to Orwell darling .😁 Do you have an answer to the question, Benny? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2023 13:21:57 GMT
Don’t compare yourself to Orwell darling .😁 Do you have an answer to the question, Benny? There was no question Herr darling . Just you trying to rope Orwell into your Nazi rhetoric. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Mar 18, 2023 13:22:44 GMT
Do you have an answer to the question, Benny? There was no question Herr darling . Just you trying to rope Orwell into your Nazi rhetoric. There is a question: Who do you think would win in a UK court? X or the neighbour? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2023 13:24:25 GMT
There was no question Herr darling . Just you trying to rope Orwell into your Nazi rhetoric. There is a question: Who do you think would win in a UK court? X or the neighbour? I think the lawyers would win. They always do. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Mar 18, 2023 13:25:51 GMT
There is a question: Who do you think would win in a UK court? X or the neighbour? I think the lawyers would win. They always do. What do you think should win? X or the neighbour? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2023 13:28:11 GMT
I think the lawyers would win. They always do. What do you think should win? X or the neighbour? I think the neighbours should be friends because everybody needs good neighbours. No one wins when neighbours fall out . |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Mar 18, 2023 13:29:40 GMT
What do you think should win? X or the neighbour? I think the neighbours should be friends because everybody needs good neighbours. No one wins when neighbours fall out . Do you think the neighbour is entitled to be angry with X for putting a rubbish dump in his back garden? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2023 13:32:46 GMT
We could call them EUlags. We call that bullshit . Satire.😒 |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Mar 18, 2023 13:34:41 GMT
Well the thing is you do not know either which was the point. You say 'fleeing persecution' but they are fleeing from France. That is the bottom line. So that means they are asylum shopping. Now asylum shopping was not the intent of the Refugee convention it was to facilitate the ability of those to escape across borders to reach a place of safety. Net migration is lower in most of those countries, we have already taken many people from Hong Kong who are a different type of refugee but non eth less part of the equation. As an interesting point, which no doubt no one will address, from the Ukraine the refugees into the UK are 82% female. The Ukraine is an active war zone and they are fleeing danger and leaving their men folk behind to tackle that danger. Across the channel those 'fleeing danger' are primarily young men of fighting age who have left behind their woman, children and elderly in the danger areas whilst they 'flee', your word, the danger. This is a demographic almost entirely missing from the Ukraine refugees. Every picture tells a story and it is this fact alone that tells us what is happening and is what makes people here feel as though the channel hoppers are indeed taking the piss out of the UK goodwill and the British people. No good will come of it and we will blame the dogooders in the end. Still no understanding have you. I agree the majority leaving Ukraine are women and children and the majority fleeing the likes of Yemen are young men. Taking the Yemen case there has been a civil war there for almost a decade, that's different from an invasion by a foreign force war, and the young men are targeted because they are seen as a threat to the opposing faction. How can you not understand that? As to France being a safe country, that ridiculous statement has been debunked many, many times. Refugees do not have to settle in the first, second or third safe country they arrive in, they can apply for asylum in any country they wish. The number coming from Yemen is pretty small and even then perhaps I am old fashioned but the job of men is to protect their families not to leave them to their fate. I understand that fully. In the Ukraine the men are threats to the Russians but those men are still there not trying to get here. France is a safe country, that is beyond dispute. The refugee convention was not designed to allow a claim in any country the applicant wishes it was to allow egress across a country whereby irregular migration was subject to problems. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2023 13:35:44 GMT
Oh I get the lame comedy but the real intention is to link a camp where illegal migrants live to the Russian gulags while pretending it was a ….satire. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2023 13:39:37 GMT
Since we are having a fantasy discussion lets inject a little seriousness.
Lets say a boat arrives on our shores with 50 'asylum seekers' on board and that 49 of them are wishing to do us harm, as some on here seem to believe, but one is a real refugee, lets make it a woman and they, under this new law, are returned to their country of origin without processing and a few weeks later we discover that on arrival in her home country she was arrested, detained, starved, raped and beaten to death, would people on this site say it was worth it to get rid of the other 49?
Honest answer only please.
|
|
