|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 6, 2023 7:00:55 GMT
Him and his worthless slut did break the rules. But of course they had the lefty woke swamp on their side. Oh do you mean the lefty woke Durham police where starmer shoehorned another labour lovey into beeing the crime commisioner, who BTW has never ever proven that she was not present at starmers piss up? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 6, 2023 7:04:06 GMT
Rotten to the core then.......Starmer is the most underhanded politician in history.... Fury after Sue Gray's activist son is pictured posing with Sir Keir Starmer during Partygate probe: Images taken at Labour events reignite impartiality row as top civil servant becomes party's chief of staff Snaps show Ms Gray’s son, Liam Conlon, standing with Sir Keir in February 2020 Allies of Boris Johnson claim the move shows her report was a Labour ‘stitch-up
Snaps unearthed by the Daily Mail show Ms Gray’s Labour activist son, Liam Conlon (circled), standing next to Sir Keir in February 2020
Fury after Sue Gray's activist son is pictured posing with Sir Keir Starmer during Partygate probe: Images taken at Labour events reignite impartiality row as top civil servant becomes party's chief of staff Snaps show Ms Gray’s son, Liam Conlon, standing with Sir Keir in February 2020 Allies of Boris Johnson claim the move shows her report was a Labour ‘stitch-up www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11823795/Tory-fury-Sue-Grays-activist-son-pictured-posing-Sir-Keir-Starmer.html when you consider that the Tories are still cosying up to Russians, in particular Johnson the traitor. You may laugh but millions more are not. And as for your total bullshit about the Torys and Russians would you like me to pst how much labour have had from Russia as well as China......Corbyn is the one stuck up pukins ring. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2023 10:11:26 GMT
Are you really this stupid or just a troll? They were fined, FFS, and accepted their guilt by not challenging the fines. So obviously laws were broken. And stop using the kind of words that a five year old might use for drinks, it does nothing to diminish the appearance of stupidity. They were issued aN FPN. Not exactly the crime of the century was it? FFS of course they paid the bloody thing they had better things to do thab piss about over a poxy 60 quid. And what's the matter about calling a piss-up a piss-up? The apperance of stupidity falls on those who cannot tell one event from another. How come in your mind Boris little shindig was not work related but Starmers pissup was?Because the police who investigated both found no case to answer with Starmer's work event but issued a whole load of fines for Boris's parties. And having investigated both, they are surely more privy to all the facts of the cases than you. Trying to equate a work session in which currys and a beer were consumed whilst working, with countless Downing Street parties is a desperate and pathetic piece of whataboutery, always the last line of defence for the indefensible. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 6, 2023 11:54:21 GMT
You were there? What made Starmers piss up a work event when Johnsons Cake was not?. Johnsons cake 'party' was in the middle of the day, in the office, between colleagues who work in that office. please explain why one piss up was a party and the other a work event - because everyone who has tried before has failed. It was widely reported that everyone present had a beer with their curry, ie singular. If you think that constitutes a piss up, please dont invite me to any of your parties, lol. And whatever you might say, there remains the fact that the police investigated both and cleared Starmer and co. I am sure they investigated the matter far more thoroughly than you and I. To try and equate the two sets of cases as laughably being identical you would have to be implying some kind of impropriety on the part of the police. Which would start to make you look like a conspiracy theorist unless you can offer both evidence and motive for such impropriety, both of which would have to be credible if you don't want to make a fool of yourself. Well that doesn't float as an excuse because the investigations were carried out by 2 different Police forces, who were operating to different interpretations and ambition to implement the rules at that time. There is a letter in todays paper from the Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley who says: Central direction from the Home Office was shambolic. Some police forces went to absurd lengths arresting people for the most trivial apparent breaches. Others used common sense. Much depended on having a chief constable who had a sense of proportion and instilled it in others. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2023 12:06:17 GMT
It was widely reported that everyone present had a beer with their curry, ie singular. If you think that constitutes a piss up, please dont invite me to any of your parties, lol. And whatever you might say, there remains the fact that the police investigated both and cleared Starmer and co. I am sure they investigated the matter far more thoroughly than you and I. To try and equate the two sets of cases as laughably being identical you would have to be implying some kind of impropriety on the part of the police. Which would start to make you look like a conspiracy theorist unless you can offer both evidence and motive for such impropriety, both of which would have to be credible if you don't want to make a fool of yourself. Well that doesn't float as an excuse because the investigations were carried out by 2 different Police forces, who were operating to different interpretations and ambition to implement the rules at that time. There is a letter in todays paper from the Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley who says: Central direction from the Home Office was shambolic. Some police forces went to absurd lengths arresting people for the most trivial apparent breaches. Others used common sense. Much depended on having a chief constable who had a sense of proportion and instilled it in others.So two different police forces is the best excuse you've got? The laws were the same in both jurisdictions. This pitiful attempt at whataboutery in the ridiculous attempt to achieve the impossible and exonerate Bozo, truly is a laughable spectacle. Or at least to try and say a plague on all their houses by trying to insinuate that Starmer was just as bad. An utterly pathetic spectacle. You are not fooling anybody except yourselves. Now I have no torch to bear for Starmer. I loathe him as much as I do the Tories. But the obvious fact remains that no one was fined for so called beergate, and over 100 were fined for parties at Downing Street. If the latter thought any injustice against them were involved they could surely have challenged the fines in court. Not one of them has. Not one. So banged to rights as far as I can see. And it is rather an amusing spectacle |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Mar 6, 2023 13:04:29 GMT
Him and his worthless slut did break the rules. But of course they had the lefty woke swamp on their side. They were investigated by the police, you stupid arse, and found not to have broken the law. Unlike Bozo and Sunak and over 100 others involved with Downing Street. That might be an unwelcome fact to you, but pretending it isn't true when it is a matter of public record, and pretending that bullshit of your own febrile imagination is true instead will fool no one with a few braincells. You are just making yourself look an utter fool. You'd be best advised to stop digging on this one. The facts of who got fined for what and who didn't following police investigations are a matter of public record. You are being laughed at by most people still reading. Yeah This would be an investigation by the same plod who took labour party directive to look the other way at Rotherham, Oldham, Rochdale, Witney (Cameron’s stomping ground, strange that) The issue isn't whether the plod say they looked into it. It’s how they found a way to ignore things put in front of them. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2023 13:09:28 GMT
Rewriting history hear.Listen to Johnson, Mogg and the rest of the Tories lined up to enthuse about here impartiality. 🤣 Nope....You lot pinned your hopes on the referendom being overturned because of a few bob overspend by the leavers and then you had your arses kicked big time at the last GE, and then you pinned your hopes on the Gray report...Not a bad hat trick was it LOL? And lets not even mention the ferendum itself and your sides hypocrisy for zero to hero in the case of Dom Cummings when he chose to go darkside. Rubbish. We wanted a confirmatory referendum for a none binding original referendum because we believed it was bad for the UK which it has been. Which has nothing to do with Sue Gray. 🤣 Do you think Sue Gray wore a disguise when she took the suitcases of booze into No.10? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2023 13:11:49 GMT
I didn't say you did but we are dealing with the hear and now and to be honest I cannot think of one tory who is worthy of being in Parliament since Johnson's purge.Can you think of a labour one? Because nobody else can who has a functional brain. In your opinion. Labour are not in government, we shall have to wait until then but the party that is in charge, watches porn in the house, lies to the house, is indecent in the house, does drugs in the house, steals from the house............................ |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2023 13:13:26 GMT
That' an opinion not based in fact, ask the police. Oh do you mean the lefty woke Durham police where starmer shoehorned another labour lovey into beeing the crime commisioner, who BTW has never ever proven that she was not present at starmers piss up? Durham police are lefty wokes because they found no evidence to say Starmer had broke the rules. You have just made the term 'lefty woke' meaningless. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2023 13:14:30 GMT
Laughable comments when you consider that the Tories are still cosying up to Russians, in particular Johnson the traitor. You may laugh but millions more are not. And as for your total bullshit about the Torys and Russians would you like me to pst how much labour have had from Russia as well as China......Corbyn is the one stuck up pukins ring. There is a difference between declared and not declared.😂 |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 6, 2023 13:15:39 GMT
Nope....You lot pinned your hopes on the referendom being overturned because of a few bob overspend by the leavers and then you had your arses kicked big time at the last GE, and then you pinned your hopes on the Gray report...Not a bad hat trick was it LOL? And lets not even mention the ferendum itself and your sides hypocrisy for zero to hero in the case of Dom Cummings when he chose to go darkside. Rubbish. We wanted a confirmatory referendum for a none binding original referendum because we believed it was bad for the UK which it has been. Which has nothing to do with Sue Gray. 🤣 Do you think Sue Gray wore a disguise when she took the suitcases of booze into No.10? The remoaner lot look like real plonckers on how they clutched at straws. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 6, 2023 13:16:26 GMT
You may laugh but millions more are not. And as for your total bullshit about the Torys and Russians would you like me to pst how much labour have had from Russia as well as China......Corbyn is the one stuck up pukins ring. There is a difference between declared and not declared.😂 Well I declare you have no working brain cells. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 6, 2023 13:19:44 GMT
Oh do you mean the lefty woke Durham police where starmer shoehorned another labour lovey into beeing the crime commisioner, who BTW has never ever proven that she was not present at starmers piss up? Durham police are lefty wokes because they found no evidence to say Starmer had broke the rules. You have just made the term 'lefty woke' meaningless. Of course they didn't some of them probably attended slammers piss up especialy the lefty pratt he shoehorned into Durham police force..But no rats to be smelt there of course acoording to you. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2023 18:28:53 GMT
Rubbish. We wanted a confirmatory referendum for a none binding original referendum because we believed it was bad for the UK which it has been. Which has nothing to do with Sue Gray. 🤣 Do you think Sue Gray wore a disguise when she took the suitcases of booze into No.10? The remoaner lot look like real plonckers on how they clutched at straws. What has that got to do with Sue Gray 'smuggling' booze into NO.10?😂 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2023 18:30:33 GMT
There is a difference between declared and not declared.😂 Well I declare you have no working brain cells. Tell me one Labour PM that went to a party with Russian spies and did not declare it.🤣 |
|
