|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 5, 2023 13:24:59 GMT
What law? or do you mean the law according to starmer and his slut? You did not read it then? Are all Labour female sluts in your book? I read it and understood it....No I didn't acduse all other labour female MP's sluts just the ones it is relevant too. Of couse I could have stated SCUM but that of course had already been usued by the slut in question. heavon forbit I break the loony left copyright laws. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Mar 5, 2023 14:43:05 GMT
One of the more interesting of the whatsapp messages revesls Boris going mental about people not adhering to his six oerson social distancing. Sent in July 2020 with a suggestion they become ‘extremely militant’ about enforcement, he asks how can people not understand this. The reason of course being the rules were different in three of the four corners of his destroyed supposedly sovereign country and he himself was breaking them with his parties. My arguement is John that Boris walked in on an impromptu birthday party which he knew nothing about. Whereas starmers pissup was organised weeks before the event took place..... Well, yes the Irish Tory supporters spokesman did say i believe the man was ambushed with a cake I feel it more reasonable to use the defence i read in the spectator Johnson walked i to a room utterly bereft of cocaine, prostitutes and naked teenage boys. How could he POSSIBLY have thought it a party ?? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 5, 2023 14:56:45 GMT
The Labour Party learning the tricks of the trade from Liar Blair and the Prince of Darkness Mandelson, nothing changes!!.....Labour needs another none entity without a personality. She will fit right in. She won't even have to do her course on mediocracy as she's already got that certificate.......And the slime ball gets more slimey ! Minister urges Keir Starmer to publish messages with Sue Gray as Partygate investigator 'insists talks on chief of staff job have only been happening for weeks' Chris Heaton-Harris stressed that he believes Sue Gray is a 'lady of integrity' A minister today urged Keir Starmer to publish details of his contacts with Sue Gray - amid claims she will tell a government watchdog she has only been in talks about the chief of staff job for 'weeks'. The Partygate investigator is said to be formally notifying the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) tomorrow that she intends to take up the political post. The step comes amid a rising clamour from Tories for the move to be blocked to avoid 'poiticising' the civil service. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11822585/Minister-urges-Keir-Starmer-publish-messages-Sue-Gray.html |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Mar 5, 2023 14:59:10 GMT
Wrong....oh and BTW it doesn't make anyone a criminal before you start with that old BS. They broke the law. Why do you think the police were 'reluctant' to investigate, given that when they did they issued 126 fines? I dont know. But where does this fit in the time line www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/dominic-cummings-lockdown-durham-police-b1798462.html?ampThis is Feb 2021 www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/18481317.police-take-no-action-dominic-cummings/This is five months earlier A decision was made that while Cummings HAD acted in a way that should have attracted punishment, the police were not going to impose any as it was ‘not in the public interest’ and despite his press conference making false claims and an admission that had he been stopped he would have been told to return home and had he not, he would have ‘faced enforcement action’ none was being taken now as no retrospective action had been taken against anyone else. So does that mean it was ok if you were not caught at the time ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2023 15:24:29 GMT
What witchhunt?'Facts' were discovered and made public, is that wrong in your opinion. The one started and continued by those of your ilk. So because it was Johnson that broke the rules we all should have ignored it? Would you have done if Starmer had broke the rules? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2023 15:26:20 GMT
You did not read it then? Are all Labour female sluts in your book? I read it and understood it....No I didn't acduse all other labour female MP's sluts just the ones it is relevant too. Of couse I could have stated SCUM but that of course had already been usued by the slut in question. heavon forbit I break the loony left copyright laws. Oh Conservatives are whiter that white then? The right is riddled with lawbreakers and that's just in Parliament. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2023 15:28:20 GMT
The Labour Party learning the tricks of the trade from Liar Blair and the Prince of Darkness Mandelson, nothing changes!!.....Labour needs another none entity without a personality. She will fit right in. She won't even have to do her course on mediocracy as she's already got that certificate.......And the slime ball gets more slimey ! Minister urges Keir Starmer to publish messages with Sue Gray as Partygate investigator 'insists talks on chief of staff job have only been happening for weeks' Chris Heaton-Harris stressed that he believes Sue Gray is a 'lady of integrity' A minister today urged Keir Starmer to publish details of his contacts with Sue Gray - amid claims she will tell a government watchdog she has only been in talks about the chief of staff job for 'weeks'. The Partygate investigator is said to be formally notifying the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) tomorrow that she intends to take up the political post. The step comes amid a rising clamour from Tories for the move to be blocked to avoid 'poiticising' the civil service. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11822585/Minister-urges-Keir-Starmer-publish-messages-Sue-Gray.htmlSue Grey was the bee's knee's until she wanted to change her job.🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 5, 2023 16:15:55 GMT
The Labour Party learning the tricks of the trade from Liar Blair and the Prince of Darkness Mandelson, nothing changes!!.....Labour needs another none entity without a personality. She will fit right in. She won't even have to do her course on mediocracy as she's already got that certificate.......And the slime ball gets more slimey ! Minister urges Keir Starmer to publish messages with Sue Gray as Partygate investigator 'insists talks on chief of staff job have only been happening for weeks' Chris Heaton-Harris stressed that he believes Sue Gray is a 'lady of integrity' A minister today urged Keir Starmer to publish details of his contacts with Sue Gray - amid claims she will tell a government watchdog she has only been in talks about the chief of staff job for 'weeks'. The Partygate investigator is said to be formally notifying the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) tomorrow that she intends to take up the political post. The step comes amid a rising clamour from Tories for the move to be blocked to avoid 'poiticising' the civil service. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11822585/Minister-urges-Keir-Starmer-publish-messages-Sue-Gray.html🤣 Was she, I can remember you lefties were pinning your hopes on her report over partygate comming out into the public domain.Tthat was 3 major fuck-ups you and your like minded have had to endure.....LOL......Not a good track record is it? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 5, 2023 16:19:38 GMT
I read it and understood it....No I didn't acduse all other labour female MP's sluts just the ones it is relevant too. Of couse I could have stated SCUM but that of course had already been usued by the slut in question. heavon forbit I break the loony left copyright laws. The right is riddled with lawbreakers and that's just in Parliament. Where exactly did I state they were?.....And as for the number of lawbreakers in parliament I think you will find that award went to labour years ago for having the most liars. And of course the biggest labour liar of them all was given a fucking knighthood. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 5, 2023 16:21:42 GMT
The one started and continued by those of your ilk. So because it was Johnson that broke the rules we all should have ignored it? Would you have done if Starmer had broke the rules?Him and his worthless slut did break the rules. But of course they had the lefty woke swamp on their side. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2023 21:25:12 GMT
This isa moment when a laughter icon is desperately needed so I can express the fact that I am laughing at such a ridiculous statementWhat's ridiculouse about it? A few friends in the same bubble sharing a few drinks and an impromptu Birthday party. It may surprise you it was NOT a law that was broken but just a guidline. Whereas starmers pissup had been planned weeks before it took place. Starmer's so called piss up consisted of just a solitary beer per person with some curry at what was quite obviously a work event. The whole thing was investigated by the police with no case to answer being the outcome. Boris and co were also investigated by the police and found to have broken laws for which they were fined. Well over 100 fines were issued to those involved, so your claim that no law was broken is demonstrably false. You don't get fined for doing things unless they are actually against the law. The whole beergate thing with Starmer was a desperate, feeble, and pathetic piece of whataboutery. Look at who got fined. That should tell you something. That you attempt to portray the exact opposite in spite of the obvious facts shows that you are deluded which is why I am laughing at you. I am no fan of Starmer. I loathe much of what he stands for. But I am a fan of clear facts and find obvious distortions of them by desperate partisans amusing. Thats why I am laughing at you. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2023 21:30:00 GMT
No wriggling here mate...Unlike you...Show where you have proof that drinkypoos was banned with those sharing the same bubble? Good luck with that one.. You are making an arse of yourself. Both beergate and the downing street parties were investigated by the police. None of those at so called beergate were found to have broken the law. Over 100 of those attending the downing street parties were found to have broken the law. This includes Johnson and Sunak themselves. Thats why they were fined. You dont get fined unless you break the law. The hole you are in on this one is so deep I'd advise you to stop digging. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2023 21:34:07 GMT
What law? or do you mean the law according to starmer and his slut? Obviously the law that he got fined for breaking. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2023 21:42:42 GMT
So because it was Johnson that broke the rules we all should have ignored it? Would you have done if Starmer had broke the rules?Him and his worthless slut did break the rules. But of course they had the lefty woke swamp on their side. They were investigated by the police, you stupid arse, and found not to have broken the law. Unlike Bozo and Sunak and over 100 others involved with Downing Street. That might be an unwelcome fact to you, but pretending it isn't true when it is a matter of public record, and pretending that bullshit of your own febrile imagination is true instead will fool no one with a few braincells. You are just making yourself look an utter fool. You'd be best advised to stop digging on this one. The facts of who got fined for what and who didn't following police investigations are a matter of public record. You are being laughed at by most people still reading. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2023 21:52:00 GMT
I don't need to the police did that for us. No they didn't.....I will ask you yet again to post positive proof that forbade people in the same working bubble sharing a few drinkypoos? Drinkypoos? Do grow up. And positive proof that laws were broken lies in the fact that well over 100 people were fined for breaking them. If the police were wrong those fined could have refused to accept this punishment and had their day in court. None did. |
|
