Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2023 16:25:47 GMT
They broke the law.Why do you think the police were 'reluctant' to investigate, given that when they did they issued 126 fines? No they didn't. There was no law that forbade those in the same bubble from having a drinkypoos. Wriggle, wriggle.🤣
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2023 16:28:08 GMT
Starmer's 'pissup' was found to be within guidelines, get over it you wokie. No it wasn't. The only thing that saved starmer was the fact that he was supported by the swamp. The police, if they had found he had broken the rules, would have pounced on him even if it was just to balance things up. They found nothing wrong, get over it. Perhaps the police should keep investigating Starmer until the wokie right get the result they want. 🤣
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 4, 2023 16:28:09 GMT
No they didn't. There was no law that forbade those in the same bubble from having a drinkypoos. Wriggle, wriggle.🤣 No wriggling here mate...Unlike you...Show where you have proof that drinkypoos was banned with those sharing the same bubble? Good luck with that one..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2023 16:29:31 GMT
But back to Sue Gray. Yeah, the whole thing now looks fishier than a kippers minge. And they all decided to accept their 'guilt' and not go to court.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2023 16:30:03 GMT
No wriggling here mate...Unlike you...Show where you have proof that drinkypoos was banned with those sharing the same bubble? Good luck with that one.. I don't need to the police did that for us.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 4, 2023 16:33:04 GMT
No wriggling here mate...Unlike you...Show where you have proof that drinkypoos was banned with those sharing the same bubble? Good luck with that one.. I don't need to the police did that for us. No they didn't.....I will ask you yet again to post positive proof that forbade people in the same working bubble sharing a few drinkypoos?
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 4, 2023 17:05:27 GMT
And they all decided to accept their 'guilt' and not go to court. I nearly fell off me chair at long last you have a had a Eureka moment , it probably made you jump, yes they admit they breached the temporary Covid Regulations as many thousands of other people did , as thousands of people do so year in year out that are issued with FPN's for speeding, littering, parking restriction , and many other offences all of which are non-recordable, welcome to reality
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2023 18:04:16 GMT
I don't need to the police did that for us. No they didn't.....I will ask you yet again to post positive proof that forbade people in the same working bubble sharing a few drinkypoos? The police did not fine them for nothing.😒 Unless you are suggesting that the police were biased against Downing street and the occupants, which as we all know is a conspiracy theory.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2023 18:06:22 GMT
And they all decided to accept their 'guilt' and not go to court. I nearly fell off me chair at long last you have a had a Eureka moment , it probably made you jump, yes they admit they breached the temporary Covid Regulations as many thousands of other people did , as thousands of people do so year in year out that are issued with FPN's for speeding, littering, parking restriction , and many other offences all of which are non-recordable, welcome to reality I have never said they were recordable just against the law at that time, no eureka there. If they had gone to court and been found guilty it would have been recorded but they decided not to. Be careful in that chair it sounds a bit suspect to me.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 4, 2023 18:21:25 GMT
No they didn't.....I will ask you yet again to post positive proof that forbade people in the same working bubble sharing a few drinkypoos? The police did not fine them for nothing.😒 Unless you are suggesting that the police were biased against Downing street and the occupants, which as we all know is a conspiracy theory. I will ask you YET again to post positive proof that forbade people in the same working bubble sharing a few drinkypoos?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2023 5:52:27 GMT
The police did not fine them for nothing.😒 Unless you are suggesting that the police were biased against Downing street and the occupants, which as we all know is a conspiracy theory. I will ask you YET again to post positive proof that forbade people in the same working bubble sharing a few drinkypoos? Boris Johnson - “Today I’ve received a fixed penalty notice from the Metropolitan Police relating to an event in Downing Street on the 19th of June 2020. Let me say immediately that I paid the fine and I once again offer a full apology,” Johnson said on Sky News. He did not specify the amount he was fined." Wiggle, wriggle. 🤣
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 5, 2023 7:36:04 GMT
I will ask you YET again to post positive proof that forbade people in the same working bubble sharing a few drinkypoos? Boris Johnson - “Today I’ve received a fixed penalty notice from the Metropolitan Police relating to an event in Downing Street on the 19th of June 2020. Let me say immediately that I paid the fine and I once again offer a full apology,” Johnson said on Sky News. He did not specify the amount he was fined." Wiggle, wriggle. 🤣 I will ask you YET again to post positive proof that forbade people in the same working bubble sharing a few drinkypoos?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2023 8:48:29 GMT
Boris Johnson - “Today I’ve received a fixed penalty notice from the Metropolitan Police relating to an event in Downing Street on the 19th of June 2020. Let me say immediately that I paid the fine and I once again offer a full apology,” Johnson said on Sky News. He did not specify the amount he was fined." Wiggle, wriggle. 🤣 I will ask you YET again to post positive proof that forbade people in the same working bubble sharing a few drinkypoos? Godd God you are either stupid or trolling.😒
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 5, 2023 8:48:58 GMT
I nearly fell off me chair at long last you have a had a Eureka moment , it probably made you jump, yes they admit they breached the temporary Covid Regulations as many thousands of other people did , as thousands of people do so year in year out that are issued with FPN's for speeding, littering, parking restriction , and many other offences all of which are non-recordable, welcome to reality I have never said they were recordable just against the law at that time, no eureka there. If they had gone to court and been found guilty it would have been recorded but they decided not to. Be careful in that chair it sounds a bit suspect to me. Even if you go to Court over any FPN the only record kept would be the fact you appeared at Court and what the verdict was , it is not a criminal conviction if it an FPN Parking Ticket that is a Civil matter
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 5, 2023 10:09:06 GMT
No they didn't.....I will ask you yet again to post positive proof that forbade people in the same working bubble sharing a few drinkypoos? The police did not fine them for nothing.😒 Unless you are suggesting that the police were biased against Downing street and the occupants, which as we all know is a conspiracy theory. The Met Police at first refused to take any action against anyone in Downing Street over leaked allegations of breaking Covid Regulations as they stated they had happened in the past historical events, normal practise is Uniformed Police Officers , Council Enforcement Officers and Traffic Wardens who witness an offence issue them on the spot, or by post if captured on CCTV. FPN for Speeding captured by Cameras have to delivered to the registered keeper of the vehicle within 14 days, any later than that and it is not valid no further action can be taken. For some reason a person took photographs from up windows looking down onto the garden of No 10 of Boris and members of staff sat or stood talking to others in his own back garden, and of course Boris being presented with a surprise birthday cake which I believe is the one he was fined for. Boris and his family lived in No 10 there is no way he could avoid being in close contact with other MP's and a large number of staff that work there every day essential workers meetings vast amounts of paperwork etc, thousands of other essential workers right across the UK were working together in close contact with each other 24/7 to keep the country going and providing the services we all need and want 24/7, if not the lights would have gone out and there would be no food in the shops. All those photos taken in No10 ended up with the press, IMO pressure was put on the Met Police to take action IMO political motivated pressure , they changed their mind and using some of those photographs as evidence to issue FPN's lots of them to issue many members of staff in No 10 and Boris and the rest is history IMO they should not have issued them, there was no way they could have avoided contact with each other, they had a job to do an essential job
|
|