|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 14, 2023 10:41:20 GMT
Don't even bother posting links to the forum you have fucked up.....I told you I am not steping foot in there again....You are a liar and not a bloody good one at that....You banned me over the thread and no amount of your BS can hide the fact......You would sell your own grand mother out to gain a bloody point on a forum......Shame on you... So it flew right past you that that was a link to THIS forum. You are lying and are running frit from a fair suggestion to get the record straight here. |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Feb 14, 2023 11:01:37 GMT
What 'far from spotless' All we have is Maily Express neanderthalism and others parroting it Maybe some think she could have run video meetings using a Sinclair ZX81 found on eBay Yet again loser you missed the word ' CUSTOM' I had one of your little childish vactions over that fact on your own moded biased miserable little forum. Jonsky - can you stop bringing up things that happened on other forums please. Steve - words like Neanderthalism are not helpful. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 14, 2023 11:24:14 GMT
What's wrong with commenting on content?
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Feb 14, 2023 11:30:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Feb 14, 2023 11:33:52 GMT
What's wrong with commenting on content? When you accuse others of parroting Neanderthalism it undermines your claim about unprovoked personal attacks. I'm just saying it's not helpful if you really want to keep exchanges civil. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Feb 14, 2023 11:51:17 GMT
Well, at least Labour are bulletproof against the accusation their front row is stuffed with old etonians |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 14, 2023 11:52:14 GMT
The slapper: "Well what we are clear on, and some of this expenditure is legitimate and I'm very clear on that... So only some of this expenditure is legitimate? Which means that some (or even most) isn't. Typical Labour. Posted without proof it is just your distorted biased opinion on the subject. And that counts for nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 14, 2023 11:52:15 GMT
What's wrong with commenting on content? When you accuse others of parroting Neanderthalism it undermines your claim about unprovoked personal attacks. I'm just saying it's not helpful if you really want to keep exchanges civil. I suggest you read your own rules: ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/thread/30/forum-rules-read
'You may accuse someone of making a 'moronic proposition or idea . . .' |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 14, 2023 11:58:19 GMT
I’ll have to try that.In the meanwhile I'm off to read her expense claims record for context. Even that would be too advanced for dumpshit rayner Nothing is too much for the over the top on insults Jonksy. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 14, 2023 12:01:40 GMT
The truth is many people are seriously scared of Rayner's ability to bluntly hold this government to account. They know she is a vote winner for the demographics that middle class voter man Starmer doesn't reach.
So they have to post fake story after fake story and silly jibe after silly jibe
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Feb 14, 2023 12:09:05 GMT
When you accuse others of parroting Neanderthalism it undermines your claim about unprovoked personal attacks. I'm just saying it's not helpful if you really want to keep exchanges civil. I suggest you read your own rules: ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/thread/30/forum-rules-read
'You may accuse someone of making a 'moronic proposition or idea . . .'In the bible it says somewhere that rules (laws) are for the evil people. The god-fearing holy people don't need them. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 14, 2023 12:23:59 GMT
In the bible it says somewhere that rules (laws) are for the evil people. The god-fearing holy people don't need them. I guess that's correct, it is the nut jobs, the overly extreme etc. who IMO are often, probably unintentionally, being evil that is the reason we have them. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 14, 2023 12:32:49 GMT
The truth is many people are seriously scared of Rayner's ability to bluntly hold this government to account. They know she is a vote winner for the demographics that middle class voter man Starmer doesn't reach. So they have to post fake story after fake story and silly jibe after silly jibe If you know anything about courts, they always tell any parties that they must have 'clean hands', or the judge will kick the case out (freedom from guilt, wrongdoing, or dishonesty; guiltlessness. "He came out of the bribery investigation triumphantly when it was proved that he had clean hands").
Same applies to Rayner/Labour, Rayner is guilty of what she is accusing the Tories of doing, ripping off the tax payers, so if she was in court the judge would kick her case out on the grounds she's come to court with dirty hands.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 14, 2023 12:35:43 GMT
The truth is many people are seriously scared of Rayner's ability to bluntly hold this government to account. They know she is a vote winner for the demographics that middle class voter man Starmer doesn't reach. So they have to post fake story after fake story and silly jibe after silly jibe If you know anything about courts, they always tell any parties that they must have 'clean hands', or the judge will kick the case out (freedom from guilt, wrongdoing, or dishonesty; guiltlessness. "He came out of the bribery investigation triumphantly when it was proved that he had clean hands").
Same applies to Rayner/Labour, Rayner is guilty of what she is accusing the Tories of doing, ripping off the tax payers, so if she was in court the judge would kick her case out on the grounds she's come to court with dirty hands.
Huge irony there FS especially with you deciding you are judge and jury with that 'Rayner is guilty'. She clearly isn't of anything other than annoying the dafter Tory press and their avid readers |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 14, 2023 12:38:08 GMT
If you know anything about courts, they always tell any parties that they must have 'clean hands', or the judge will kick the case out (freedom from guilt, wrongdoing, or dishonesty; guiltlessness. "He came out of the bribery investigation triumphantly when it was proved that he had clean hands").
Same applies to Rayner/Labour, Rayner is guilty of what she is accusing the Tories of doing, ripping off the tax payers, so if she was in court the judge would kick her case out on the grounds she's come to court with dirty hands.
Huge irony there FS especially with you deciding you are judge and jury with that 'Rayner is guilty'. She clearly isn't of anything other than annoying the dafter Tory press and their avid readers To be fair when any of us see you backing someone up, then it's just confirmation we are right. |
|
