|
Post by see2 on Feb 24, 2023 9:26:43 GMT
No need Stevie. Iām watching you dig.. You could help yourself by looking up and understanding the term, 'default'. that way would have an opportunity to stop making a fool of yourself. Or you could reply to this post in your immature school boy manner that you have become accustomed to doing. Either way you will see that you have or are exposing yourself as a poster of complete idiocy.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 24, 2023 10:04:02 GMT
No need Stevie. Iām watching you dig.. You could help yourself by looking up and understanding the term, 'default'. that way would have an opportunity to stop making a fool of yourself. Or you could reply to this post in your immature school boy manner that you have become accustomed to doing. Either way you will see that you have or are exposing yourself as a poster of complete idiocy. Stop posting projection ( as if you could ). š
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 25, 2023 12:01:49 GMT
You could help yourself by looking up and understanding the term, 'default'. that way would have an opportunity to stop making a fool of yourself. Or you could reply to this post in your immature school boy manner that you have become accustomed to doing. Either way you will see that you have or are exposing yourself as a poster of complete idiocy. Stop posting projection ( as if you could ). š He is just a frigging waste of time mate....Just another coffin dodger who is a waste of oxygen.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 25, 2023 12:22:33 GMT
Stop posting projection ( as if you could ). š He is just a frigging waste of time mate.... Just another coffin dodger who is a waste of oxygen.Oy, I'm older than him.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 25, 2023 12:28:35 GMT
He is just a frigging waste of time mate.... Just another coffin dodger who is a waste of oxygen.Oy, I'm older than him. No offence mate....LOL.....They say wisdom comes with age....It sure gave c2 a miss.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 25, 2023 16:00:48 GMT
Oy, I'm older than him. No offence mate....LOL.....They say wisdom comes with age....It sure gave c2 a miss. You don't have the intellectual capacity to be able to judge, and your opinions are easily ignored.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 25, 2023 16:36:58 GMT
No offence mate....LOL.....They say wisdom comes with age....It sure gave c2 a miss. You don't have the intellectual capacity to be able to judge, and your opinions are easily ignored. He knows I am your master.
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Feb 26, 2023 1:43:26 GMT
SHE CALLED A TORY MP SCUM WHILE HE WAS SPEAKING IN THE COMMONS (live on TV)!!!!Stop defending hate speech just because it is hate speech that you agree with ffs. She played the victim during growler gate, let everybody rally around her, even got the speaker to haul in a newspaper editor... and made them look complete idiots when the newspaper editor provided proof that the story was real... and she was the fucking source of it because she told dirty jokes on a Westminster smoking balcony!! Don't be ridiculous, I am not defending hate speech, I'm just looking for the honest facts of the matter. Which is extremely difficult once Tory propaganda gets a grip. IIRC her joke was in response to something a Tory who MP made a comment and she was attempting to turn the situation into a joke, then the crap Tory propaganda stepped in. I'll answer the rest later its time for me to go out. I actually quite like her, but she fucked up with repeated "Tory Scum" language, and she fucked up big time during Growlergate. You are way off on Growlergate. She denied the entire story, to such an extent that the Speaker tried to drag the editor of the MoS in to explain himself. The editor politely refused and pointed out that she was actually the origin of the story via "that joke". That doesn't excuse the story, it was in very bad taste. The facts are that she sat on her hands and allowed a witch hunt to form on her behalf and she left her supporters looking like compete fools when the source of the story turned out to be her own mouth, not some misogynistic Tories. She then unbelievable sat on her hands again during Beergate, by not mentioning she was 6 feet away from the beer swigging Starmer!!
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 26, 2023 12:01:22 GMT
You don't have the intellectual capacity to be able to judge, and your opinions are easily ignored. He knows I am your master.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 26, 2023 13:08:09 GMT
Don't be ridiculous, I am not defending hate speech, I'm just looking for the honest facts of the matter. Which is extremely difficult once Tory propaganda gets a grip. IIRC her joke was in response to something a Tory who MP made a comment and she was attempting to turn the situation into a joke, then the crap Tory propaganda stepped in. I'll answer the rest later its time for me to go out. I actually quite like her, but she fucked up with repeated "Tory Scum" language, and she fucked up big time during Growlergate. You are way off on Growlergate. She denied the entire story, to such an extent that the Speaker tried to drag the editor of the MoS in to explain himself. The editor politely refused and pointed out that she was actually the origin of the story via "that joke". That doesn't excuse the story, it was in very bad taste. The facts are that she sat on her hands and allowed a witch hunt to form on her behalf and she left her supporters looking like compete fools when the source of the story turned out to be her own mouth, not some misogynistic Tories. She then unbelievable sat on her hands again during Beergate, by not mentioning she was 6 feet away from the beer swigging Starmer!! An alternative view. debuk.wordpress.com/2022/05/01/a-tale-of-two-politicians/
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Feb 26, 2023 14:32:59 GMT
I actually quite like her, but she fucked up with repeated "Tory Scum" language, and she fucked up big time during Growlergate. You are way off on Growlergate. She denied the entire story, to such an extent that the Speaker tried to drag the editor of the MoS in to explain himself. The editor politely refused and pointed out that she was actually the origin of the story via "that joke". That doesn't excuse the story, it was in very bad taste. The facts are that she sat on her hands and allowed a witch hunt to form on her behalf and she left her supporters looking like compete fools when the source of the story turned out to be her own mouth, not some misogynistic Tories. She then unbelievable sat on her hands again during Beergate, by not mentioning she was 6 feet away from the beer swigging Starmer!! An alternative view. debuk.wordpress.com/2022/05/01/a-tale-of-two-politicians/ Did you actually read your link It's hilarious - especially the bit where it says that Nicola Sturgeon is portrayed as a seductress!
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Feb 26, 2023 23:00:56 GMT
I actually quite like her, but she fucked up with repeated "Tory Scum" language, and she fucked up big time during Growlergate. You are way off on Growlergate. She denied the entire story, to such an extent that the Speaker tried to drag the editor of the MoS in to explain himself. The editor politely refused and pointed out that she was actually the origin of the story via "that joke". That doesn't excuse the story, it was in very bad taste. The facts are that she sat on her hands and allowed a witch hunt to form on her behalf and she left her supporters looking like compete fools when the source of the story turned out to be her own mouth, not some misogynistic Tories. She then unbelievable sat on her hands again during Beergate, by not mentioning she was 6 feet away from the beer swigging Starmer!! An alternative view. debuk.wordpress.com/2022/05/01/a-tale-of-two-politicians/ How is that an alternative view? I literally said the story was "in very bad taste". I also said at the time the story broke it was a disgrace for a newspaper to print it. My point was her dishonest reactions to the story... and how she threw everybody under the bus that came to her defense... ironically, including the writer of that article you linked lol.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 27, 2023 9:11:37 GMT
Did you actually read your link It's hilarious - especially the bit where it says that Nicola Sturgeon is portrayed as a seductress! You are entitled to and welcome to your jaundiced opinion.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 27, 2023 9:16:09 GMT
How is that an alternative view? I literally said the story was "in very bad taste". I also said at the time the story broke it was a disgrace for a newspaper to print it. My point was her dishonest reactions to the story... and how she threw everybody under the bus that came to her defense... ironically, including the writer of that article you linked lol. My original understanding remains, that none of this story would have evolved but for the insinuation by a Tory MP that Rayner was deliberately crossing and uncrossing her legs in order to distract Boris during PMs questions.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 27, 2023 9:22:33 GMT
Did you actually read your linkIt's hilarious - especially the bit where it says that Nicola Sturgeon is portrayed as a seductress! Does he reand anything?
|
|