|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 2, 2023 12:26:02 GMT
Do you have any evidence that what went on was against the rules? No, all you have is speculation. From what I've seen on TV Bojo was at an organised party, it appears that Starmer was at a late meal that followed directly from a days work that finished late and was expected to finish late. That appears to be the difference. Oh ffs stop the world I'm getting off. Oyez Oyez, everyone logged on past present and future, hear this: According to See2, sitting in a room necking back the San Miguel with 30 people as they scoff a £200 take out curry was perfectly acceptable and within social distancing rules. Especially if the Labour Police and Crime Commissioner was on the table doing the dance of the flaming arseholes. Well lets face it, if she had the police would have still said, nothing to see hear folks. Now lets move onto more serious things. Ahh yes, that peice of cake. How dare he eat cake when the country was in lockdown. He should have been court martialled damn him. Yes, let's put your clear and obvious bias away and get back to reality as seen by those who's job it was to investigate. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 2, 2023 12:32:17 GMT
Except that there was no "beer & curry bash", just your stinging wound over the stupidity of BOJO. I think you need to read up on the differences in the situations. I'm not going to sit here arguing if you can't accept the basic facts and the differences in the two situations. I think I do accept the basic facts. I am influenced by those who's job it was to investigate, and by what I've seen on TV. Perhaps I have an advantage in that I do not read the biased propaganda in the Tory press ? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 2, 2023 12:36:38 GMT
So…Boris and co didn’t do anything worse than Starmer and co but because Starmers booze and curry was ‘work related ‘it doesn’t count ? It's about the relevant rules. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 2, 2023 12:44:40 GMT
Red, the rule is very simple You could theoretically organise an wife-swapping orgy involving dozens of people. So long as the orgy is work related, you have not broken the rules. Boris's cake was not work related cake and he was therefore breaking the rules. So what's classed as 'work related food', curry?
I don't know how you define work related food, most people who work in any job often take cake, sweets, biscuits to work, does that mean they get fined because it's not work related food?
IIRC, one was ruled as an organised party, the other was work-late food that was taken because work had taken the people past their normal tea time, which would have been even later by the time they had made their way home. If that is not the difference then I am open to factual options, i.e. ones that make sense and are not just based upon insinuations and personal opinions. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 2, 2023 12:48:53 GMT
So…Boris and co didn’t do anything worse than Starmer and co but because Starmers booze and curry was ‘work related ‘it doesn’t count ? It's about the relevant rules. It looks like it’s about 2 lots of people doing the same thing . |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 2, 2023 12:50:20 GMT
So what's classed as 'work related food', curry?
I don't know how you define work related food, most people who work in any job often take cake, sweets, biscuits to work, does that mean they get fined because it's not work related food?
IIRC, one was ruled as an organised party, the other was work-late food that was taken because work had taken the people past their normal tea time, which would have been even later by the time they had made their way home. If that is not the difference then I am open to factual options, i.e. ones that make sense and are not just based upon insinuations and personal opinions. I'm surprised the loony lefties haven't jumped on this one, being told what they can eat, when they can eat it, and for once they'd actually have a point. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 2, 2023 13:13:56 GMT
So what's classed as 'work related food', curry?
I don't know how you define work related food, most people who work in any job often take cake, sweets, biscuits to work, does that mean they get fined because it's not work related food?
IIRC, one was ruled as an organised party, the other was work-late food that was taken because work had taken the people past their normal tea time, which would have been even later by the time they had made their way home. If that is not the difference then I am open to factual options, i.e. ones that make sense and are not just based upon insinuations and personal opinions. They could have each taken a sarnie and bottle of water. It's alleged that the ginger growler fell off Starmer's lap.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2023 13:19:08 GMT
It's about the relevant rules. It looks like it’s about 2 lots of people doing the same thing . Anyone but a fool can see the difference between a late meal whilst working and a full on party, lol. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 2, 2023 13:26:36 GMT
It looks like it’s about 2 lots of people doing the same thing . Anyone but a fool can see the difference between a late meal whilst working and a full on party, lol. Only a fool would argue that one was less of a risk than the other. …….lol🙄 |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2023 13:26:43 GMT
It looks like it’s about 2 lots of people doing the same thing . Anyone but a fool can see the difference between a late meal whilst working and a full on party, lol. Well stammer is a total twat and he couldn’t tell the difference. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 2, 2023 13:27:43 GMT
It looks like it’s about 2 lots of people doing the same thing . between a late meal whilst working and a full on party, lol. We noticed.  |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2023 13:36:44 GMT
IIRC, one was ruled as an organised party, the other was work-late food that was taken because work had taken the people past their normal tea time, which would have been even later by the time they had made their way home. If that is not the difference then I am open to factual options, i.e. ones that make sense and are not just based upon insinuations and personal opinions. They could have each taken a sarnie and bottle of water. It's alleged that the ginger growler fell off Starmer's lap. Did she fall or was she pushed....LOL |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 2, 2023 13:38:05 GMT
IIRC, one was ruled as an organised party, the other was work-late food that was taken because work had taken the people past their normal tea time, which would have been even later by the time they had made their way home. If that is not the difference then I am open to factual options, i.e. ones that make sense and are not just based upon insinuations and personal opinions. They could have each taken a sarnie and bottle of water. It's alleged that the ginger growler fell off Starmer's lap. Maybe it was an orgy which had not been specifically outlawed by the rules  |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 2, 2023 13:42:47 GMT
Anyone but a fool can see the difference between a late meal whilst working and a full on party, lol. Only a fool would argue that one was less of a risk than the other. …….lol🙄 Partying, as in Bojo's case, is about intermingling. If you have an argument it is with those who's job it was to make the judgement. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 2, 2023 13:45:42 GMT
Only a fool would argue that one was less of a risk than the other. …….lol🙄 Partying, as in Bojo's case, is about intermingling. If you have an argument it is with those who's job it was to make the judgement. Was it? Iirc the Johnson photo I saw involved people reasonably distanced. Are you claiming that Starmers beer and curry fest didn’t involve ‘ intermingling’? Do you have evidence to support this ? |
|
