|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 1, 2023 16:14:19 GMT
What did the claimed actions of a Tory MP have to do with Blair/Labour? I don't know you tell us, you were the one who brought it up.
Why would we be interested in a case from 1999 involving a Conservative who might have had dodgy dealings?
We are talking about the here and now. LOL
You obviously didn't follow the context of the posts so you are not in a position to comment. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 1, 2023 16:16:12 GMT
Oy you, I'm older than see2 thouigh it doesn't show.  Yes but do you put your glasses in the fridge and your pajamas in the dishwasher ? About three months ago I forgot to take the wallet out of my trouser pocket. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 1, 2023 16:20:48 GMT
So your answer to the fact that Starmer was found not guilty is “Doesn’t mean no one was guilty". That is to insinuate that there was guilt, hence my reply. Now stop playing with words because you are letting yourself down AGAIN. There was no insinuation See2 except between your ears . It is you that obviously needs English lessons, here's a starter. Insinuation: NOUN an unpleasant hint or suggestion of something bad: You might also throw in a comprehension lesson. I am not going to waste my time trying to educate you any further. BYE. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 1, 2023 16:23:19 GMT
There was no insinuation See2 except between your ears . It is you that obviously needs English lessons, here's a starter. Insinuation: NOUN an unpleasant hint or suggestion of something bad: You might also throw in a comprehension lesson. I am not going to waste my time trying to educate you any further. BYE. As I said , there was no insinuation except in your head. Your dictionary supports me , not you . How can you educate anyone on a subject that you can’t comprehend? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 1, 2023 16:34:26 GMT
It is you that obviously needs English lessons, here's a starter. Insinuation: NOUN an unpleasant hint or suggestion of something bad: You might also throw in a comprehension lesson. I am not going to waste my time trying to educate you any further. BYE. As I said , there was no insinuation except in your head. Your dictionary supports me , not you . How can you educate anyone on a subject that you can’t comprehend? Your claim is easy to make but it contradicts your post, it also makes a nonsense of your comment. There's no point in my trying to debate any further with some who doesn't even understand the language. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 1, 2023 16:35:18 GMT
You are posting your opinion as if it was a fact again. IMO only cynical people would go as far as you have gone. Is there room for speculation? Perhaps. Is there any positive evidence? Absolutely not. If you had read my post without your usual juvenile emotional approach then you would of realised that I did not claim that there was positive evidence and did allude to there being room for speculation . Reading lessons for the elderly would be a great help to you .A fucking brain would even be better.... |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 1, 2023 16:36:38 GMT
As I said , there was no insinuation except in your head. Your dictionary supports me , not you . How can you educate anyone on a subject that you can’t comprehend? Your claim is easy to make but it contradicts your post, it also makes a nonsense of your comment. There's no point in my trying to debate any further with some who doesn't even understand the language. It contradicts nothing . The claim of an insinuation is a construct of your desperate mind. Your blatant projection underlines it but you are too self absorbed to see it. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 1, 2023 16:36:44 GMT
If you had read my post without your usual juvenile emotional approach then you would of realised that I did not claim that there was positive evidence and did allude to there being room for speculation . Reading lessons for the elderly would be a great help to you .A fucking brain would even be better.... Are you thinking of getting something a lot better than the one you have? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 1, 2023 16:36:45 GMT
Or ask "Mohamed Al Fayed's former personal assistant yesterday told the high court how on at least three occasions large cash payments were made in brown envelopes to the former Conservative minister," Just googled your unreferenced highly selective c&p It's from an account of a libel trial in the Guardian , nearly 23 years agoTue 30 Nov 1999 01.35 GMT www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/nov/30/hamiltonvalfayed.stuartmillarHe is the only prick who is old enough to rememer this shit. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 1, 2023 16:37:15 GMT
If you had read my post without your usual juvenile emotional approach then you would of realised that I did not claim that there was positive evidence and did allude to there being room for speculation . Reading lessons for the elderly would be a great help to you .A fucking brain would even be better.... He has a brain, it just doesn’t work very well 😁 |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Feb 1, 2023 16:45:31 GMT
Children. Children. Stop and take a breath. You’re all looking ridiculous…
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 1, 2023 16:49:12 GMT
Lol😁
|
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Feb 1, 2023 18:12:51 GMT
My post was in context to the post I was replying to. So the tone of your post is silly. Not in context at all , completely silly post from you , immature ,irrelevant and an total inability on your behalf to distinguish between a defendant charged with corruption currently in the criminal courts and ancient history defence witness evidence called in a civil law libel trial a whole 23 years ago.. |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Feb 1, 2023 18:17:36 GMT
Oh dear . See2 needs a reading lesson “Doesn’t mean no one was guilty “ ….I think even you can work that out “Only the gullible would think that” ….. that means only the gullible would think there that no one was guilty if “there was an investigation, and no guilt found.” Ie that there was room for speculation. I’ll be charging for the next lesson . Teaching English to geriatrics is tiring but rewarding . So your answer to the fact that Starmer was found not guilty is “Doesn’t mean no one was guilty". That is to insinuate that there was guilt, hence my reply. Now stop playing with words because you are letting yourself down AGAIN. Starmer was found not guilty in a court of law ? When did this happen? What had he been charged with? Who was the judge and which court? Link please to the court report as I do not remember seeing anything about Starmer and a criminal trial |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2023 20:34:11 GMT
Children. Children. Stop and take a breath. You’re all looking ridiculous… You should see the utter fools they are making of themselves in the "Murdoch sending in the bitches" thread. lol This forum is full of old fools whose main achievement on this forum is to so effectively disprove the adage that wisdom comes with age. |
|
