|
Post by oracle75 on Jan 22, 2023 7:59:43 GMT
A recent report about the allocation of funds across regions of GB is summarised here. fullfact.org/economy/levelling-up-funding-2023/There are various ways of assessing where the 2 billion or so government fund has been spent including per GDP of the region or per capita of the population. The chart in the link above is, I believe, per capita. So populous areas get more money that rural areas. And populated areas usually contain cities which already offer more opportunity and cultural life. Also there has been a debate as to whether the government should stop deciding allocation of funds and let regions decide where to invest. Right now regions submit bids and hope they are successful. Instead should central government grant them a sum and let local authorities make decisions about where to spend it? Last there have been accusations that Tories have been bunging traditional Tory seats with more money, with the GE coming over the horizon. This is our money we are legally obliged to pay and the promise in the Tory manifesto was to eventually bring poorer areas up to South and Southeastern standards by improving transport, investment in industry and technology, better housing and opportunities for children, and cultural activities. How is our government doing?
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 22, 2023 8:12:18 GMT
The top 4 recipients are Wales, the North West, North east and Northern Ireland..
Looks like the money is going to the correct areas.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Jan 22, 2023 9:47:07 GMT
The top 4 recipients are Wales, the North West, North east and Northern Ireland.. Looks like the money is going to the correct areas. I think so as well
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Jan 22, 2023 10:24:12 GMT
The top 4 recipients are Wales, the North West, North east and Northern Ireland.. Looks like the money is going to the correct areas. I think so as well If you look at per capita spending, I thought so too. But if you consider need, there is a question. If you have areas of small populations, where it is hard to get to and where buses are being cut back and cars are more expensive to run, where towns are dying, their needs for investment are far more than people in the SE who are poorer but are on benefits, who have better transport links and more vibrant towns, it seems to me that the North needs far more investment than it got. It isn't a question of income, levelling up is about infrastructure. The great new rail system which was sold as the gateway to levelling up is shrinking due to lack of money which is being spent on the SE which is the best served area of GB. And if you base the results on per capita, areas of few people will be registered as receiving more than someone in a more crowded area and actually be receiving less. It seems that the great levelling up is flimsy at best and I wouldn't be surprised if it disappears entirely after the next election. Another Tory Boris lie.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 22, 2023 11:51:52 GMT
Well you can always say that it isn't enough - but the reality is that there is a limited size to the pot.
I'd also point out that the area with the highest deprivation in England is in the South East which got one of the lowest amounts of funding.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Jan 22, 2023 14:05:09 GMT
Well you can always say that it isn't enough - but the reality is that there is a limited size to the pot. I'd also point out that the area with the highest deprivation in England is in the South East which got one of the lowest amounts of funding. Yes we don't have huge amounts of money therefore they have to select where it should be spent hopefully in the right places that need it, North West and the North East IMO yes been neglected for a long time . As for the South East yes lots of depravation on the South Coast in Kent etc, same in London especially among Pensioners due to the higher cost of living in the Capital
|
|