|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 6, 2023 20:16:08 GMT
If you look around ,you can find it . That isn’t the point . The point was that you hijacked my specific point to bore everybody about your view of the DM . You are still doing it . It's a valid point when you quote something so unreliable as a source. If its honest you should be able to supply the same facts from elsewhere, in which case I will read it and if I have anything to add I will comment on it. But expecting me to read the Daily Mail will get you nowhere. It’s not a valid point when you hijack a specific point to bore everyone about your view of the source . You are still doing it after being told several times. I don’t expect anything from you . If I did initially. my expectations would have ebbed after you repeatedly ignored the points made and turned them into a platform for you little rant . |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2023 20:22:07 GMT
Thanks, but it thinks I need to have an account into which I must log before I can read anything more than the first few sentences. Am not signing up to anything. Which is like a Catch 22, as he gave a link to the Daily Mail, which is free, and you won't make an account at the Indy, so still you won't read it. If you don't want to read a link, what on earth is the point of attempting to debate the content? It makes no sense. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2023 20:32:31 GMT
Thanks, but it thinks I need to have an account into which I must log before I can read anything more than the first few sentences. Am not signing up to anything. Which is like a Catch 22, as he gave a link to the Daily Mail, which is free, and you won't make an account at the Indy, so still you won't read it. If you don't want to read a link, what on earth is the point of attempting to debate the content? It makes no sense. I have not attempted to debate the content. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2023 20:44:08 GMT
Thanks, but it thinks I need to have an account into which I must log before I can read anything more than the first few sentences. Am not signing up to anything. Which is like a Catch 22, as he gave a link to the Daily Mail, which is free, and you won't make an account at the Indy, so still you won't read it. If you don't want to read a link, what on earth is the point of attempting to debate the content? It makes no sense. Okay, well I broke the habit of years and read the damned link. If it is as reported - never an absolute certainty where the Mail is concerned - I will make two points. Firstly just naming people publicly without giving evidence is a bit dubious though it seems she meant to share the information with colleagues only, to warn them about suspected dodgy characters. In which case someone has leaked it for whatever nefarious purposes. The other point I would like to make is that if female MPs are having to warn each other about potential sex pest MPs, it does tend to suggest that such conduct is all too prevalent with not enough being done about it. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Jan 8, 2023 14:11:10 GMT
You aught to check the reliability of your source.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Jan 8, 2023 14:29:46 GMT
It's not me who started this thread with a point to prove. Those that want to prove their point would be best advised posting links to reliable sources. Why should I do your lazy arse work for you? It's you lot seeking to persuade me and you want me to do the work of finding the reliable evidence to support you because you can't be bothered? Doesn't work like that sunshine. The onus is upon those trying to make the case to provide the reliable evidence. It's not me trying to persuade anyone of anything with Daily Mail headlines. Sorry but if you can't provide more persuasive evidence than that it is a total fail. Would you discuss the matter in hand if the source was the Independent? Then yyou could stop vilifying the Daily Mail in a thread where you have declined to read the source. Here you go, I'll give it a go. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-whatsapp-sex-pest-allegations-b2254701.htmlBut The Independent quotes the Daily Mail as its source... |
|
