|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 2, 2023 18:13:08 GMT
Just for those who feel lonley and out of their depth.....LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Jan 2, 2023 19:11:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 2, 2023 19:14:31 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2023 3:04:47 GMT
No they don't but it was wrong to assert that she was only accusing Labour MPs as the OP was clearly trying to insinuate, that was the point I made. I suspect there was a fair sprinkling of Labour MPs there. Otherwise the headlines would be different. If you think Daily Mail headlines are in any way reliable, bigger fool you. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2023 3:10:43 GMT
You are by a very long way the least intellectually challenging buffoon on this forum, in spite of some stiff competition. All you do is post idiocies, then troll and insult and utterly fail to engage mentally with those who show you up because you clearly lack the brains for it. If your primary goal around here is to make yourself look stupid, well done! |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 5, 2023 4:50:28 GMT
You are by a very long way the least intellectually challenging buffoon on this forum, in spite of some stiff competition. All you do is post idiocies, then troll and insult and utterly fail to engage mentally with those who show you up because you clearly lack the brains for it. If your primary goal around here is to make yourself look stupid, well done! Ah bless has someone pissed on your cat? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 5, 2023 10:03:28 GMT
I suspect there was a fair sprinkling of Labour MPs there. Otherwise the headlines would be different. If you think Daily Mail headlines are in any way reliable, bigger fool you. What part of the headlines was incorrect ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2023 18:02:31 GMT
You are by a very long way the least intellectually challenging buffoon on this forum, in spite of some stiff competition. All you do is post idiocies, then troll and insult and utterly fail to engage mentally with those who show you up because you clearly lack the brains for it. If your primary goal around here is to make yourself look stupid, well done! Ah bless has someone pissed on your cat? I rest my case. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2023 18:13:25 GMT
If you think Daily Mail headlines are in any way reliable, bigger fool you. What part of the headlines was incorrect ? I don't know because I don't read Daily Mail headlines. Whatever parts may be correct would be reported in more reliable sources. So why not simply quote more reliable sources. Posting a link to the Daily Mail and expecting me to read it and take it seriously.....well let's just say I'd be more likely to read and take seriously a link to the Beano. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 5, 2023 18:42:15 GMT
What part of the headlines was incorrect ? I don't know because I don't read Daily Mail headlines. Whatever parts may be correct would be reported in more reliable sources. So why not simply quote more reliable sources. Posting a link to the Daily Mail and expecting me to read it and take it seriously.....well let's just say I'd be more likely to read and take seriously a link to the Beano. So you post “If you think Daily Mail headlines are in any way reliable, bigger fool you.” When you haven’t read the actual headlines . I think I know who the fool is ..you. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 5, 2023 18:49:53 GMT
Ah bless has someone pissed on your cat? You have no case apart from the case your dildo came in. Anyway I have far better things to do right now. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2023 18:52:33 GMT
I don't know because I don't read Daily Mail headlines. Whatever parts may be correct would be reported in more reliable sources. So why not simply quote more reliable sources. Posting a link to the Daily Mail and expecting me to read it and take it seriously.....well let's just say I'd be more likely to read and take seriously a link to the Beano. So you post “If you think Daily Mail headlines are in any way reliable, bigger fool you.” When you haven’t read the actual headlines . I think I know who the fool is ..you. I am very well acquainted with the unreliability of Daily Fail headlines, which is why I rarely waste by time reading them anymore. Or should I say I often get to read the actual headlines because I work in an outlet that sells newspapers, but I never waste my time reading the actual articles. Far too unreliable. Anyone who is not a complete fool would post links to more reliable sources if these exist and if they want to be taken seriously by a broader spectrum of opinion. If it is only to be found in the Fail it is likely to be bullshit. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2023 18:54:26 GMT
You have no case apart from the case your dildo came in. Anyway I have far better things to do right now. Troll, lol |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jan 5, 2023 19:05:55 GMT
So you post “If you think Daily Mail headlines are in any way reliable, bigger fool you.” When you haven’t read the actual headlines . I think I know who the fool is ..you. I am very well acquainted with the unreliability of Daily Fail headlines, which is why I rarely waste by time reading them anymore. Or should I say I often get to read the actual headlines because I work in an outlet that sells newspapers, but I never waste my time reading the actual articles. Far too unreliable. Anyone who is not a complete fool would post links to more reliable sources if these exist and if they want to be taken seriously by a broader spectrum of opinion. If it is only to be found in the Fail it is likely to be bullshit. Nobody said that DM headlines were always accurate. I posted ‘I suspect there was a fair sprinkling of Labour MPs there. Otherwise the headlines would be different.’ . This seemed to trigger a diatribe about the DM in your head . No one cares if you read the DM or not . |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2023 19:13:18 GMT
I am very well acquainted with the unreliability of Daily Fail headlines, which is why I rarely waste by time reading them anymore. Or should I say I often get to read the actual headlines because I work in an outlet that sells newspapers, but I never waste my time reading the actual articles. Far too unreliable. Anyone who is not a complete fool would post links to more reliable sources if these exist and if they want to be taken seriously by a broader spectrum of opinion. If it is only to be found in the Fail it is likely to be bullshit. Nobody said that DM headlines were always accurate. I posted ‘I suspect there was a fair sprinkling of Labour MPs there. Otherwise the headlines would be different.’ . This seemed to trigger a diatribe about the DM in your head . No one cares if you read the DM or not . It is an issue here when people post links to the Mail to try and make a case, when some of us regard it as so unreliable as a news source that we refuse to read it. It is only an issue because the usual suspects insist upon linking to it and expecting us to read it like it is the font of all knowledge just because they are daft enough to see it as their bible. If the same story were linked to a more reliable source, not only would more people read it but the unreliability of the Fail would not even be a topic of discussion. |
|
