BBC dramas ‘warping modern Britain.'

Attacking the messenger and not the message.

Colour me shocked.

Looks nothing like a right wing group: campaigncommonsense.com/

I don't think that it does bother people, what bothers people is the reason why television appears to imply that it should be mandatory.

And not only that, according to the BBC many of the senior police officers are black women!! And they only seem to investigate cases involving white offenders!!!

I think it's  promoting racism.

There were many blond and blond couples in Nazi Germany. That did not bother people what did bother the whole world was presenting that type of partnership as not just the norm but the preference and the ideal. It is not a matter of objecting to mixed race couples it is objecting to the propaganda that mixed race couples are not just the norm but the preference and the ideal. That is put across in many small and subtle ways by lauding diversity as a positive thing, presenting mixed race couples in the public eye as often as possible and even getting geneticists involved in a 'wonderful mixed up world''


www.mixedracestudies.org/?p=8933

If one promotes a specific racial outlook as being 'best' then that is no better than the Nazis and their Eugenics policies. It seems impossible for the left to grasp this simple problem.

I have long held the view that a BBC forced to find people actually willing to pay to receive its content as opposed to being able to rely on the force of law to steal money from everyone watching their competitors would in VERY short order reform its behaviour.

I am told by the left that such a model would destroy the very essence of the character the BBC has upheld from the very start.

Maybe when I was fifteen and the worst scandal they could broadcast was Poldark and The Onedin Line I might have worried about that

Today I would die laughing at such a suggestion for the left have already done that ten times over

And let us be honest here, a subscription service BBC might find to its surprise that if it were to separate out all its woke Shyte and offer a regular service and a premium woke Shyte channel add on, they might get lovers of Owen Jones Woke Shyte Daily to shell out the wonga to pay for it

I doubt it because he’s already tried to launch the woke Shyte podcast channel and nobody signed up, but hey, who knows, pigs may yet fly

And if the entire BBC were indeed to switch to a “woke Shyte only” pay to view subscription service peddling nothing but woke Shyte 24/7/365 and suddenly flourish through willing subscribers paying to have that demand satisfied. then I for one would be delighted.

Because I don’t care a jot if the BBC wishes to sink into a quagmire of wokery

I just want them to have the right to steal my money to pay for it curtailed

Outraged lefties will of course rubbish this article, but I doubt it will come as a surprise to most people. The BBC have long been banner wavers for minorities and the left. If the BBC are accused of left wing bias they don't even deny it, they fight their corner and I have to say, why not? They have absolutely nothing to lose. Unlike commercial TV the BBC don't rely on advertising revenue and if people choose not to watch the BBC and viewing figures drop it wont affect the coffers because people have to buy a BBC TV licence regardless of whether they watch BBC. It's a racket the left wing BBC cant lose. 

If by normal you mean typical or to be expected it isn't. Yet in watching the output of the major channels and the advertising agencies it is not just normal it is prolific. That has to be a selection process and possibly there are various factors in that process but if the 'unintended' consequence of policies is to guide to a new racially mixed society then one has to consider how 'unintended' it was. If there is even the slightest intention to create a different ethnic society then that is no different to the Nazis and their Eugenics programmes and I thought that type of ethnic manipulation was something that was anathema to most people.