|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 17, 2022 0:34:40 GMT
She chairs the Communications and Digital Committee to look into the future of the BBC.
So where did she start?
So she goes and qualifies as a secretary at a local college, then joins the military in and ends up deciding for the nation how the BBC should be.
Who the hell picks these kind of dunces? Don't we have anyone more intelligent than a secretary to do these important jobs?
One more thing:
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Dec 17, 2022 5:54:49 GMT
Maybe she can cap all that experiernce by being a misandrist.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 17, 2022 12:13:11 GMT
Maybe she can cap all that experiernce by being a misandrist. No, I think you are as thick as she is.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Dec 17, 2022 12:33:49 GMT
Maybe she can cap all that experiernce by being a misandrist. No, I think you are as thick as she is. I'm honoured by your opinion since she's brighter than you.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 17, 2022 17:51:20 GMT
No, I think you are as thick as she is. I'm honoured by your opinion since she's brighter than you. What has she done to deserve that then? Where is evidence of her brightness?
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Dec 17, 2022 17:53:31 GMT
I'm honoured by your opinion since she's brighter than you. What has she done to deserve that then? Where is evidence of her brightness? It's based on my opinion that you are not as bright as you think or would have us believe.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 17, 2022 18:04:19 GMT
What has she done to deserve that then? Where is evidence of her brightness? It's based on my opinion that you are not as bright as you think or would have us believe. The thread is about Baroness Stowell, not attacking me. Can't you get that into your thick head?
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Dec 17, 2022 18:05:34 GMT
It's based on my opinion that you are not as bright as you think or would have us believe. The thread is about Baroness Stowell, not attacking me. Can't you get that into your thick head? I'm defending her against your ill-conceived views.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 17, 2022 18:28:44 GMT
The thread is about Baroness Stowell, not attacking me. Can't you get that into your thick head? I'm defending her against your ill-conceived views. You failed to defend her because I asked what evidence there was to suggest she is any smarter than a typical secretary, which by most accounts is a very simple career. This all turned on its head once she joined the military. It does not figure.
We have 22,855 professors in the UK and one BBC. Why use an ex-secretary?
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Dec 17, 2022 20:32:46 GMT
I'm defending her against your ill-conceived views. You failed to defend her because I asked what evidence there was to suggest she is any smarter than a typical secretary, which by most accounts is a very simple career. This all turned on its head once she joined the military. It does not figure.
We have 22,855 professors in the UK and one BBC. Why use an ex-secretary?
I don't care what you have to say, I've stated my case. Byeeeeee.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 17, 2022 20:36:59 GMT
I know. I suppose you would vote for her as well.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Dec 17, 2022 22:02:18 GMT
I know. I suppose you would vote for her as well. As has been mention by others, you do talk some shite.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Dec 28, 2022 1:10:30 GMT
Don't we have anyone more intelligent than a secretary to do these important jobs?. Why do you believe you need more than five O Levels and a peerage to hold that position ?
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 28, 2022 12:28:25 GMT
Don't we have anyone more intelligent than a secretary to do these important jobs?. Why do you believe you need more than five O Levels and a peerage to hold that position ? I don't. I believe in a crony system such as we have, you just have to have fucked the right people.
No need to waste time educating them to the standards of intelligence and ability we had come to expect in the past.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2023 23:20:01 GMT
I'm defending her against your ill-conceived views. You failed to defend her because I asked what evidence there was to suggest she is any smarter than a typical secretary, which by most accounts is a very simple career. This all turned on its head once she joined the military. It does not figure.
We have 22,855 professors in the UK and one BBC. Why use an ex-secretary?
The secretary might actually be quite intelligent. Not everyone who does lower level jobs is a thicko you know. You are frankly coming across as a bit of a snob. As long as she has the intelligence to do the job - and having been a secretary does not prove that she does not, your own snobbish assumptions notwithstanding - then it might even be a positive to have a normal person from an everyday job in the role, rather than yet another elitist.
|
|