Is the farmers inheritance tax necessary?

How do farmers use the land for tax avoidance?

You are starting to miss the point overall. People in general do not mind paying tax when it works as regards to operate the country in some form of equitable fashion. It now seems that Labour will take 'the tough decisions' that effectively spell ruination for some Brits and cold cold winters for others in order to raise what is effectively small amounts of cash to service policies that are at best seriously unpopular and at worst spell disaster for the country. The tough decisions that needed to be taken were in the channel, in the hotels and in the workplace where immigration is overwhelming the country and creating division and antipathy that has already come to a partial head. This general malaise has been knocked on the head by the government with Draconian 'justice' and the subservience of the judiciary but it has not gone away and it seems like there is a determination on the part of government to exacerbate the problems at every turn. I see no logic in it but then perhaps there is not any. 

I think it comes back to the lefts age old "Divide and conquer", Stalinist mentality.

Let's not forget, Stalin also deliberately destroyed food production.

Of course, the left always think that they can keep a lid on the societal divisions that they create. Although history has shown that they can't.

Why all the confusion? Inheritance tax is a tax on unearned income. We all pay tax on unearned income.

__"The IRS considers the interest earned (on a Bank account is) taxable income, whether you keep the money in the account, transfer it to another account, or withdraw it. When the bank pays interest into your account during the tax year, you will owe taxes on it."-- It is in effect regarded as unearned income.

I think it's time for you to start thinking objectively.

Clarkson makes a key statement which I think from personal experience is not quite the guided missile he makes it to be, but here it is

If, Clarkson says, the aim is to close a tax loophole where wealthy individuals are investing in farming as a tax loophole, then surely the obvious thing to do is target individuals who have multiple income streams, as he does.

Because the fact is as many are saying, the cost of buildings and machinery mean that few farms are worth less than a million pounds. Starmer says fewer than five hundred farms will be affect d each year. How many farms are there in Britain, and how many farmers die in a year. That is what he is not saying.

It was the case that dad could sink £1,000 pa into his grandkids accounts under their control (i.e they had to be over eight). He died in 2005 having shifted about £80,000 that way. But his house was only worth £230,000 then.

These days it's more like £3000 in total